Background/Objectives: Blood vessel tortuosity can complicate endovascular procedures such as endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. This study aimed to assess the morphometric characteristics of carotid arteries and investigate the association between the tortuosity of the carotid arteries and the technical aspects of endovascular thrombectomy, patient demographics and clinical characteristics, and treatment outcome. Methods: This retrospective study included 84 patients with ischemic stroke treated by endovascular thrombectomy at the newly established thrombectomy-capable stroke center. The following data were collected from prethrombectomy computed tomography angiography: aortic arch type, type of carotid artery tortuosity, and tortuosity index (TI). The technical aspects of the procedure, as well as patient demographics, were collected from the radiological information system. Results: Time from arterial puncture to the first pass was significantly shorter in patients with a nontortuous carotid artery compared to a tortuous one (p = 0.006). There were no significant differences in the number of passes, total duration of the procedure, and the difference in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score before and after the procedure regarding the form of tortuosity. Patients with hypertension had significantly higher tortuosity index values compared to those without hypertension (p = 0.008), and patients with a nontortuous carotid tree were significantly younger compared to those with all forms of tortuosity (p = 0.003). Conclusions: The majority of patients had tortuous carotid arteries, which were associated with older age and hypertension. A high index of tortuosity was associated with a longer time from arterial puncture to the first pass, but not to the treatment outcome. Preprocedural recognition of carotid artery tortuosity may aid in endovascular thrombectomy procedural planning.

Clot-in-transit (CIT) is a free-floating thrombus in the right heart and can enter pulmonary circulation at any moment. Possible treatments include anticoagulation, systemic thrombolysis, surgical embolectomy, and endovascular catheter-based therapies. The optimal treatment is still undetermined, heavily relying on clinical judgment and multidisciplinary team discussion. We report a case of a 70-year-old woman presenting with tachydyspnoea following recent abdominal surgery, who was diagnosed with massive bilateral pulmonary embolism (PE) complicated by a clot-in-transit. Point-of-care ultrasonography revealed a large mobile thrombus in the right atrium with severe right ventricular dysfunction. Due to haemodynamic instability and a contraindication for systemic thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy was performed. A large thrombotic burden was aspirated from the right heart and pulmonary arteries, resulting in haemodynamic stabilization and recovery of right ventricular function. The patient remained stable throughout hospitalization and was discharged on oral anticoagulation therapy with complete recovery on follow-up. This case highlights several points. Firstly, CIT is a rare finding but should be considered in patients with massive pulmonary embolism and shock. Furthermore, POCUS is essential for diagnosing CIT. Finally, mechanical thrombectomy is a valuable therapeutic option in high-risk PE patients with contraindications to systemic thrombolysis and haemodynamic instability. Further studies are needed to establish adequate guidelines for the optimal management of CIT patients.