Dr. Mohd Zaki Awang Chek

Dr. Dr. Mohd Zaki Awang Chek

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 October 2025 in Mathematics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ECEma Carnia
Ema Carnia
Sukono SukonoSukono Sukono
Sukono Sukono
MSMoch Panji Agung Saputra
Moch Panji Agung Saputra
MLMugi Lestari
Mugi Lestari
AHAudrey Ariij Sya’imaa HS
Audrey Ariij Sya’imaa HS
DCDr. Mohd Zaki Awang Chek
Dr. Mohd Zaki Awang Chek
Investment decision-making is often characterized by uncertainty and the subjective weighting of criteria. This study aims to develop a more robust decision support framework by integrating the Generalized Interval-Valued Hesitant Intuitionistic Fuzzy Soft Set (GIVHIFSS) with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to objectively weight criteria and handle multi-evaluator hesitancy. In the proposed GIVHIFSS-AHP model, the AHP is employed to derive mathematically consistent criterion weights, which are subsequently embedded into the GIVHIFSS structure to accommodate interval-valued and hesitant evaluations from multiple decision-makers. The model is applied to a numerical case study evaluating five investment alternatives. Its performance is assessed through a comparative analysis with standard GIVHIFSS and GIFSS models, as well as a sensitivity analysis. The results indicate that the model produces financially rational rankings, identifying blue-chip technology stocks as the optimal choice (score: +2.4). The comparative analysis confirms its superiority over existing models, which yielded less-stable rankings. Moreover, the sensitivity analysis demonstrates the robustness of the results against minor perturbations in criterion weights. This research introduces a novel and synergistic integration of the AHP and GIVHIFSS. The key advantage of this approach lies in its ability to address the long-standing issue of arbitrary criterion weighting in Fuzzy Soft Set models by embedding the AHP as a foundational mechanism for ensuring validation and objectivity. This integration results in mathematically derived, consistent weights, thereby yielding empirically validated, more reliable, and defensible decision outcomes compared with existing models.

1 January 2012 in AIP Conference Proceedings
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
DCDr. Mohd Zaki Awang Chek
Dr. Mohd Zaki Awang Chek
AAAbu Bakar Ahmad
Abu Bakar Ahmad
ARAhmad Nur Azam Ahmad Ridzwan
Ahmad Nur Azam Ahmad Ridzwan
IJImran Md. Jelas
Imran Md. Jelas
NJNur Faezah Jamal
Nur Faezah Jamal
SNSyamsul Ikram Mohd Noor
Syamsul Ikram Mohd Noor
The main objective of this study is to forecast the future claims amount of Invalidity Pension Scheme (IPS). All data were derived from SOCSO annual reports from year 1972 - 2010. These claims consist of all claims amount from 7 benefits offered by SOCSO such as Invalidity Pension, Invalidity Grant, Survivors Pension, Constant Attendance Allowance, Rehabilitation, Funeral and Education. Prediction of future claims of Invalidity Pension Scheme will be made using Univariate Forecasting Models to predict the future claims among workforce in Malaysia.

6 July 2026 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ECEma Carnia
Ema Carnia
Sukono SukonoSukono Sukono
Sukono Sukono
DSDwi Susanti
Dwi Susanti
DCDr. Mohd Zaki Awang Chek
Dr. Mohd Zaki Awang Chek
MLMugi Lestari
Mugi Lestari
MSMoch Panji Agung Saputra
Moch Panji Agung Saputra
Effective environmental sustainability decision-making requires the consideration of both positive and negative information, as well as the integration of weighting methods, to ensure decisions are accurate and representative of real-world conditions. This study presents a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) on the development of the Weighted Bipolar Fuzzy Soft Set (WBFSS) framework for environmental sustainability decision-making. Articles were retrieved from three databases: Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Dimensions. The screening process adhered to PRISMA 2020 guidelines and identified 27 relevant articles. VOSviewer was subsequently used to conduct a bibliometric analysis, mapping keyword co-occurrences and the structural landscape of research topics. The analysis examined the evolution of Bipolar Fuzzy Soft Set (BFSS) frameworks, their application domains, and the integration of weighting methods within BFSS and related Fuzzy Soft Set (FSS) frameworks. The review found that, although 11 studies addressed environmental sustainability applications, only three explicitly employed BFSS-based frameworks, indicating that the application of BFSS in this domain remains limited. Furthermore, the incorporation of explicit weighting techniques within BFSS remains scarce, particularly for objective, data-driven weighting approaches. These findings provide a comprehensive overview of current research trends, identify important methodological gaps, and support the conceptual development of the WBFSS framework as a direction for future research rather than an established decision-making framework. This study highlights opportunities to advance decision-support methods for environmental sustainability, which may support future climate-related and sustainability-oriented decision-making in the context of Sustainable Development Goal 13 (Climate Action).

1 January 2012 in AIP Conference Proceedings
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
FZFaiz Zulkifli
Faiz Zulkifli
IIIsma Liana Ismail
Isma Liana Ismail
DCDr. Mohd Zaki Awang Chek
Dr. Mohd Zaki Awang Chek
NJNur Faezah Jamal
Nur Faezah Jamal
ARAhmad Nur Azam Ahmad Ridzwan
Ahmad Nur Azam Ahmad Ridzwan
AAAbu Bakar Ahmad
Abu Bakar Ahmad
The Employment Injury Scheme (EIS) provides protection to employees who are injured due to accidents whilst working, commuting from home to the work place or during employee takes a break during an authorized recess time or while travelling that is related with his work. The main purpose of this study is to forecast value on claims amount of EIS for the year 2011 until 2015 by using appropriate models. These models were tested on the actual EIS data from year 1972 until year 2010. Three different forecasting models are chosen for comparisons. These are the Naïve with Trend Model, Average Percent Change Model and Double Exponential Smoothing Model. The best model is selected based on the smallest value of error measures using the Mean Squared Error (MSE) and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE). From the result, the best model that best fit the forecast for the EIS is the Average Percent Change Model. Furthermore, the result also shows the claims amount of EIS for the year 2011 to year 2015 continue to trend upwards from year 2010.