Marcin Wrocławska Kaszuba

Prof. Dr. Marcin Wrocławska Kaszuba


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 June 2016 in Eksploatacja i Niezawodność – Maintenance and Reliability
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHMarek Hawryluk
Marek Hawryluk
MKMarcin Wrocławska Kaszuba
Marcin Wrocławska Kaszuba
ZGZbigniew Gronostajski
Zbigniew Gronostajski
PSPrzemyslaw Sadowski
Przemyslaw Sadowski

28 June 2017 in The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MHMarek Hawryluk
Marek Hawryluk
ZGZbigniew Gronostajski
Zbigniew Gronostajski
MKMarcin Wrocławska Kaszuba
Marcin Wrocławska Kaszuba
SPSławomir Polak
Sławomir Polak
PWPaweł Widomski
Paweł Widomski
Smolik JerzySmolik Jerzy
Smolik Jerzy

9 July 2020 in Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MHMarek Hawryluk
Marek Hawryluk
PWPaweł Widomski
Paweł Widomski
MKMarcin Wrocławska Kaszuba
Marcin Wrocławska Kaszuba
JKJakub Krawczyk
Jakub Krawczyk
The study performs an overview and evaluation of the currently applied methods of preheating forging tools used in hot die forging processes performed on presses and presents the development and tests of new, more effective methods. Based on the conducted complex analysis of the temperature changes taking place on and directly beneath the surface of forging dies during their preliminary heating, an analysis was performed of one of the most commonly used methods of tool heating, i.e., using a charge material and a waste material. Next, the study proposes the introduction of changes and improvements of this method to achieve repeatability and stability of the obtained temperatures. To that end, detailed guidelines concerning the manner and time of the heating process were elaborated. The following step was the development of a new, more effective heating method. The first draft involved a new concept of heating using heaters localized in the die’s housing or heaters in the shape of forgings placed between the dies. Both concepts of heating were numerically modeled, which made it possible to assess their effectiveness. The last step of the research was the development of a heating method using induction heaters. This method was the most effective and brought the best results, which was confirmed during the modeling of the heating process and in the tests conducted on the prototype test stand. The obtained results confirm the effectiveness of almost all the methods, especially the method of heating by means of a charge material, supported by new guidelines, the method of heating with the use of forging-shaped heaters and the method of induction heating. Only in the case of heating with heaters mounted in the tool housing was the assumed working temperature not achieved. Some differences were observed mainly related to efficiency, that is, the heating speed in respect to the assumed temperature. The performed tests showed that the best method is induction heating as it is over twice as fast. Therefore, it is usually recommended for the process of heating and the additional heating realized in the work center of the press on the mounted tools, where the time aspect is especially important.

24 November 2025 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PWPaweł Widomski
Paweł Widomski
MKMarcin Wrocławska Kaszuba
Marcin Wrocławska Kaszuba
DDDaniel Dobras
Daniel Dobras
Dominik TerefinkoDominik Terefinko
Dominik Terefinko
MKMichał Kołodziński
Michał Kołodziński
Additive manufacturing (AM) of hot-work tool steels such as H13 offers unique opportunities for producing complex, conformally cooled tools with reduced production time and material waste. In this study, five metal AM technologies—Fused Deposition Modeling and Sintering (FDMS, Desktop Metal Studio System and Zetamix), Binder Jetting (BJ), Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF), and Directed Energy Deposition (DED)—were compared in terms of microstructure, porosity, and post-processing heat treatment response. The as-printed microstructures revealed distinct differences among the technologies: FDMS and BJ exhibited high porosity (6–9%), whereas LPBF and DED achieved near-full densification (<0.1%). Samples with sufficiently low porosity (BJ, LPBF, DED) were subjected to tempering and quenching treatments to evaluate hardness evolution and microstructural transformations. The satisfactory post-treatment hardness was observed in both tempered and quenched and tempered BJ samples, associated with secondary carbide precipitation, while LPBF and DED samples retained stable martensitic structures with hardness around 600 HV0.5. Microstructural analyses confirmed the dependence of phase morphology and carbide distribution on the thermal history intrinsic to each AM process. The study demonstrates that while FDMS and BJ are more accessible and cost-effective for low-density prototypes, LPBF and DED offer superior density and mechanical integrity suitable for functional tooling applications.

6 October 2020 in Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMarcin Wrocławska Kaszuba
Marcin Wrocławska Kaszuba
The article deals with the wear of forging tools used in hot forging processes. The research presented in the work includes analysis of tool life used in a selected industrial hot die forging process. Multiple treatment variants were used to increase wear resistance, including thermo-chemical treatment (nitriding), welding methods (surfacing) and an innovative new hybrid technology combining surfacing and nitriding. First of all, the research focused on determining the impact of the phase structure of the nitrided layers used and the surfacing layer on resistance to destructive factors occurring in the analyzed process. Next, hybrid treated tools combining surfacing and nitriding were also subjected to operational tests. Each of the tools analyzed in this work was operated until it was withdrawn due to excessive wear, and then subjected to comprehensive analysis. The tests of tools after operation included: surface scanning to determine the amount of wear of the analyzed tools after work, microhardness measurement, and microscopic tests. A detailed analysis of changes in the surface layer of tools in selected areas was made using a scanning microscope. The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of the hybrid surface treatment process used to increase the wear resistance of the surface layer of tools and thereby improve the durability of the forged tools analyzed. The obtained research results indicate a beneficial effect of using the new technology resulting in 300% increase in the durability of the analyzed tools. The effect of improving durability confirmed by obtained results arises from the use of hybrid layers, which are more resistant to abrasive wear and to cracking due to thermo-mechanical fatigue. Moreover, the study shows that nitriding may have a beneficial influence on improving the lifetime of forging tools, under the condition that the nitrided layer has an α diffusive layer structure, without a larger amount of γ’ and ε nitride precipitates.

1 April 2020 in The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MHMarek Hawryluk
Marek Hawryluk
DDDaniel Dobras
Daniel Dobras
MKMarcin Wrocławska Kaszuba
Marcin Wrocławska Kaszuba
PWPaweł Widomski
Paweł Widomski
JZJacek Ziemba
Jacek Ziemba
The study performs an analysis as well as makes a comparison of the durability of forging tools used in the die forging process made of high-strength steel Unimax. For tool steel WCL (1.2343 according to DIN), which has been applied so far, the obtained average durability has been at the level of about 6000 forgings. Additionally, in order to increase the durability of the Unimax material, two surface treatment variants were applied: in the form of ion nitriding (for nitrides A) and gas nitriding together with a PVD-Alvin coating, which were compared with the results for an insert without surface treatment. For each variant, three tools were produced, in order to obtain repeatable and verified results. In the first place, an analysis of the working conditions of the tools was performed through thorough observations of the industrial forging process, particularly the tribological conditions, including the manner of lubrication as well as the temperature distributions, by means of, among others, thermovisual examinations. Additionally, numerical modeling of the process was carried out with the purpose of a more accurate analysis of the tool work in contact. Next, a detailed analysis of the exploitation of the worn tools was performed, including a macroscopic and geometrical analysis through 3D scanning, microscopic optical, and SEM tests as well as microhardness measurements. The obtained results demonstrated that only the application of the new material, Unimax, itself caused a durability increase by 2.5 times with regard to the WCL steel used so far. In turn, with the application of additional surface engineering techniques, Unimax tools characterized in better operational properties (high thermal and abrasive wear resistance at elevated temperatures), which made it possible to forge over four times more forgings, i.e., 26,000 items, after nitriding with a PVD-Alvin coating had been applied to the tool.