Recognition of the anatomical course of the chorda tympani nerve (CTN) is important for preventing iatrogenic injuries during middle-ear surgery. This study aims to compare visualization of the CTN using two computed tomography (CT) methods: conventional high-resolution CT (C-HRCT) and ultra‐high-resolution CT (U-HRCT). We performed a retrospective visual assessment of 59 CTNs in normal temporal bones of 54 consecutive patients who underwent both C-HRCT and U-HRCT. After dividing CTN into three anatomical segments (posterior canaliculus, tympanic segment, and anterior canaliculus), two neuroradiologists scored the visualizations on a four-point scale. On C-HRCT, the visual scores of the posterior canaliculus, tympanic segment, and anterior canaliculus were 3.5 ± 0.7, 1.6 ± 0.6, and 3.1 ± 0.7, respectively. The respective values were significantly higher in all segments on U-HRCT: 3.9 ± 0.2, 2.4 ± 0.6, 3.5 ± 0.6 (p < 0.01). Although the difference in scores between methods was greatest for the tympanic segment, the visual score on U-HRCT was lower for the tympanic segment than for the anterior and posterior segments (p < 0.01). Ultra‐high-resolution CT provides superior visualization of the CTN, especially the tympanic segment.

Background/Objectives: Dysregulated gamma oscillations are associated with cognitive dysfunction. Auditory stimulation at 40 Hz enhances neural activity in brain regions associated with learning, attention, and memory. This study assessed the safety and acceptability of 40 Hz amplitude-modulated auditory stimulation in healthy older people. Auditory stimuli were created using popular songs, where vocals and background music were separated and independently amplitude-modulated at 40 Hz with different modulation depths to generate periodic 40 Hz gamma waveforms. Methods: In this open-label, single-arm study, healthy participants aged ≥65 years received 40 Hz amplitude-modulated auditory stimulation daily via a smartphone for 28 days through earphones/headphones. Safety was assessed through adverse event (AE) monitoring and changes in clinical scores for depression, cognitive function, and hearing thresholds. Acceptability was evaluated by adherence rates, listening time, dropout reasons, volume levels, intent for future use, and subjective impressions of the sound source on a 7-point Likert scale. Results: Among 28 participants (mean age 69.1 years, 53.6% female), six reported 12 AEs, with six considered device-related (e.g., ear discomfort, jaw pain, musculoskeletal stiffness). The AEs observed were mild or moderate. Scores for cognitive function, depression, and hearing thresholds did not worsen during the study period. Adherence was observed in 96.4%, with 85.7% expressing interest in continuing. Most participants rated the sounds’ unnaturalness between 2 and 3 and discomfort between 1 and 3 on the 7-point Likert scale. Conclusions: The intervention was well tolerated and acceptable in study participants, with no major safety concerns identified. Auditory stimulation did not cause severe discomfort or reduce acceptability. Further studies should explore the long-term effects and broader clinical applications.