Background/Objectives: Gestalt therapy traditionally opposes categorical diagnostic labelling due to its fundamental inconsistency with phenomenological and process-oriented ontology. However, this epistemological rigour can limit integration with structured evidence-based interventions for complex personality organizations such as Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD). Despite the evidence base for DBT and Schema Therapy in treating BPD, these approaches may inadvertently minimize the lived phenomenological experience and organismic wisdom central to recovery. Meanwhile, Gestalt therapy’s anti-diagnostic stance limits its integration with structured evidence-based protocols. This paper proposes a hybrid theoretical model that addresses this gap by integrating the clinical epistemology of Gestalt therapy with Linehan’s biosocial theory of Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT) and schema-focused interventions, while preserving the core principles of Gestalt. Methods: we present a model of theoretical integration that draws on Gestalt contact theory, the four modules of DBT (mindfulness, distress tolerance, emotional regulation, interpersonal effectiveness) and the experiential techniques of Schema Therapy. The integration focuses on the dialectic of acceptance and change, which mirrors Gestalt’s paradoxical theory of change. The proposed framework preserves the non-protocol dimension of Gestalt therapy while incorporating the pragmatic utility of DBT and Schema Therapy. Results: key conceptual contributions we propose include: (1) theorizing the “Draft Self” as the object and subject of therapeutic work, (2) integrating mindfulness and grounding as embodied processes within live Gestalt experiments, (3) activation techniques to explore the identity fragmentation endemic to BPD. Conclusions:his integration offers a coherent, embodied, and process-oriented framework for understanding and treating BPD that validates patients’ lived experience, mobilizes evidence-based interventions, and opens up meaningful intertheoretical dialogue.

This paper introduces SNAP (Structure, Narrative, Activation, Process, Next), a multi-dimensional clinical reflection tool designed to support psychotherapists in systematically attending to phenomenological, relational, and process-oriented dimensions during therapeutic work. SNAP integrates Gestalt therapy's phenomenological foundations with complex systems theory and the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework, com-prising 73 items organized across five dimensions: Structure, Narrative, Activation, Process, and Next. A preliminary validation study with 20 psychotherapists employed a retrospective pre-post design in which participants rated the utility of each SNAP item for clinical reflection before and after SNAP training. Results showed significantly higher perceived utility after training (T2: M = 6.69, SD = 0.54) compared to retrospective baseline (T1: M = 6.02, SD = 0.70), with mean increase of +0.67 points (Cohen's d = 0.29, p < 0.05 for 15/73 items). Greatest utility gains were observed in phenomenological dimensions: Next (d = 0.63), Activation (d = 0.51), Narrative (d = 0.45), and Process-Therapist (d = 0.43). Structural bio-psycho-social dimensions showed minimal gains (d = -0.02 to 0.15), sug-gesting these were already well-integrated in therapists' clinical thinking. Findings suggest SNAP enhances reflective capacity by systematically directing attention to phenomenological dimensions that are valued but inconsistently attended to. Further psychometric validation with larger samples is warranted.

This paper introduces SNAP (Structure, Narrative, Activation, Process, Next), a multidimensional clinical reflection tool supporting psychotherapists in systematically attending to phenomenological, relational, and process-oriented dimensions. SNAP integrates Gestalt therapy, complex systems theory, and the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework, comprising 73 items across five dimensions. A pilot acceptability and perceived utility study (N = 20 psychotherapists) used a retrospective pre-post design in which participants provided retrospective pre-exposure and post-exposure ratings for each item. Post-exposure ratings were higher overall than retrospective pre-exposure ratings (T2: M = 6.69, SD = 0.54 vs. T1: M = 6.02, SD = 0.70; mean difference +0.67; Hedges’ g = 0.28, Cohen’s d = 0.29; 15/73 items p < 0.05 uncorrected; 2/73 after Benjamini-Hochberg FDR correction). The largest descriptive contrasts were observed in phenomenological dimensions: Next (g = 0.61), Activation (g = 0.49), Narrative (g = 0.43), and Process-Therapist (g = 0.41). Structural bio-psycho-social dimensions showed minimal contrasts (d = −0.02 to 0.15). Absolute post-exposure ratings were high across items (89% rated 6/9 or above), supporting good acceptability and perceived usefulness within this sample. These preliminary findings support SNAP as a promising, positively perceived framework for clinical reflection. Larger-sample psychometric validation is warranted.

Gestalt therapy traditionally opposes categorical diagnostic labelling due to its fundamental inconsistency with phenomenological and process-oriented ontology. However, this epistemological rigour can limit integration with structured evidence-based interventions for complex personality organisations such as Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD). This paper proposes a hybrid theoretical model that integrates the clinical epistemology of Gestalt therapy with Linehan's biosocial theory of Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT) and schema-focused interventions, while preserving the core principles of Gestalt. We present a model of theoretical integration that draws on Gestalt contact theory, the four modules of DBT (mindfulness, distress tolerance, emotional regulation, interpersonal effectiveness) and the experiential techniques of Schema Therapy. The integration focuses on the dialectic of acceptance and change, which mirrors Gestalt's paradoxical theory of change. The proposed framework preserves the non-protocol dimension of Gestalt therapy while incorporating the pragmatic utility of DBT and Schema Therapy. Key innovations include: (1) conceptualising the “draft self” as the object and subject of therapeutic work, (2) integrating mindfulness and grounding as embodied processes within live Gestalt experiments, (3) activation techniques to explore the identity fragmentation endemic to DBP. This integration offers a coherent, embodied, and process-oriented framework for understanding and treating DBP that validates patients' lived experience, mobilises evidence-based interventions, and opens up meaningful intertheoretical dialogue.