Salinization poses a significant challenge in agriculture, exacerbated by anthropogenic global warming. Biostimulants, derived from living microorganisms or natural extracts, have emerged as valuable tools for conventional and organic agriculture. However, our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the effects of biostimulants is very limited, especially in crops under real cultivation conditions. In this study, we adopted an integrative approach to investigate the effectiveness of the combined application of plant growth‐promoting bacterium (Bacillus megaterium strain BM08) and a non‐microbial biostimulant under control conditions (normal watering) and salt stress. After confirming the yield increase under both conditions, we investigated the molecular mechanisms underlying the observed effect by measuring a number of physiological parameters (i.e., lipid peroxidation, antioxidants, chlorophylls, total phenolics and phytohormone content), as well as RNA sequencing and primary metabolite analyses. Our findings reveal that the combined effect of the microbial and non‐microbial biostimulants led to a decrease in the antioxidant response and an up‐regulation of genes involved in cytokinin biosynthesis under salt stress conditions. This, in turn, resulted in a higher concentration of the bioactive cytokinin, isopentenyladenosine, in roots and leaves and an increase in γ‐aminobutyric acid, a non‐proteic amino acid related to abiotic stress responses. In addition, we observed a decrease in malic acid, along with an abscisic acid (ABA)‐independent up‐regulation of SR‐kinases, a family of protein kinases associated with abiotic stress responses. Furthermore, we observed that the single application of the non‐microbial biostimulant triggers an ABA‐dependent response under salt stress; however, when combined with the microbial biostimulant, it potentiated the mechanisms triggered by the BM08 bacterial strain. This comprehensive investigation shows that the combination of two biostimulants is able to elicit a cytokinin‐dependent response that may explain the observed yield increase under salt stress conditions.

The human gut microbiota plays a critical role in health throughout life. While fruits and vegetables are well-known sources of nutrients and prebiotics, recent studies suggest they may also contribute viable microorganisms to the gut microbiome, particularly when consumed raw. However, the impact of agricultural practices—such as the use of microbial biostimulants or exposure to salt stress—on the composition of the edible plant microbiome remains poorly understood. In this study, we performed a comprehensive metataxonomic analysis of the endophytic microbiome in the edible tissues (leaves or fruits) of lettuce (Lactuca sativa) and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), cultivated under standard conditions with or without microbial biostimulants and salt stress. Our results show that microbial biostimulants—Priestia megaterium (PGPB) and Rhizophagus irregularis (AMF)—as well as moderate salt stress, significantly reshape the composition and diversity of endophytes in both crops. Notably, the PGPB and NaCl treatments enhanced the abundance of bacterial genera such as Pantoea, Stenotrophomonas, and Massilia, which are associated with plant health and may have probiotic potential. Salt stress also increased alpha-diversity indices and favored the presence of Firmicutes and Bacteroidota, phyla commonly linked to a healthy human gut microbiome. Agronomic inputs used in organic and conventional farming, such as microbial biostimulants or controlled salt exposure, may represent novel strategies to enhance the microbial quality of fresh produce and promote gut microbial diversity through diet.