Daewon Kim

Dr. Daewon Kim

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2020 in Annals of Laboratory Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JUJean Damascene Uwizeyimana
Jean Damascene Uwizeyimana
DKDaewon Kim
Daewon Kim
HLHyunsook Lee
Hyunsook Lee
JBJung-Hyun Byun
Jung-Hyun Byun
DYDongeun Yong
Dongeun Yong
PHPh.D.
Ph.D.
Jean Damascene Uwizeyimana, M.D., Daewon Kim, M.D., Hyunsook Lee, M.Sc., Jung-Hyun Byun, M.D., and Dongeun Yong, M.D., Ph.D.. Ann Lab Med 2020;40:306-11. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2020.40.4.306

1 May 2022 in Annals of Laboratory Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJunhyup Song
Junhyup Song
SYShinyoung Yoon
Shinyoung Yoon
YIYongha In
Yongha In
DKDaewon Kim
Daewon Kim
HLHyukmin Lee
Hyukmin Lee
KLKyoungwon Lee
Kyoungwon Lee
Junhyup Song, M.D., Shinyoung Yoon, M.D., Yongha In, Ph.D., Daewon Kim, M.D., Hyukmin Lee, M.D., Dongeun Yong, M.D., Ph.D., and Kyoungwon Lee, M.D.. Ann Lab Med 2022;42:358-62. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2022.42.3.358

1 July 2020 in Annals of Laboratory Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KLKwang Seob Lee
Kwang Seob Lee
DKDaewon Kim
Daewon Kim
HLHyukmin Lee
Hyukmin Lee
KLKyungwon Lee
Kyungwon Lee
DYDongeun Yong
Dongeun Yong
Kwang Seob Lee, M.D., Daewon Kim, M.D., Hyukmin Lee, M.D., Ph.D., Kyungwon Lee, M.D., Ph.D., and Dongeun Yong, M.D., Ph.D.. Ann Lab Med 2020;40:334-6. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2020.40.4.334

1 July 2020 in Laboratory Medicine Online
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BKBoyeon Kim
Boyeon Kim
HKHyung Sun Kim
Hyung Sun Kim
JKJin Ju Kim
Jin Ju Kim
YPYu Jin Park
Yu Jin Park
DKDaewon Kim
Daewon Kim
B.B.S.
B.S.
Boyeon Kim, M.D., Hyung Sun Kim, B.S., Jin Ju Kim, M.D., Yu Jin Park, M.D., Daewon Kim, M.D., Dongeun Yong, M.D.. Lab Med Online 2020;10:221-6. https://doi.org/10.3343/lmo.2020.10.3.221

31 August 2016 in The Korean Journal of Blood Transfusion
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJooyoung Cho
Jooyoung Cho
HNHyunjin Nah
Hyunjin Nah
DKDaewon Kim
Daewon Kim
ELEunkyung Lee
Eunkyung Lee
JKJIN SEOK KIM
JIN SEOK KIM
HKHyun Ok Kim
Hyun Ok Kim
Jooyoung Cho, Hyunjin Nah, Daewon Kim, Eunkyung Lee, Jin Seok Kim, and Hyun Ok Kim. KJBT 2016;27:164-8. https://doi.org/10.17945/kjbt.2016.27.2.164

20 September 2020 in Annals of Clinical Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JMJustin Mugiraneza
Justin Mugiraneza
MKMijung Kwon
Mijung Kwon
DKDaewon Kim
Daewon Kim
SLSang-Guk Lee
Sang-Guk Lee
HLHyukmin Lee
Hyukmin Lee
DYDongeun Yong
Dongeun Yong
Background: The rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) performed on urine samples would guide the adequate choice of antibiotics for obtaining better treatment outcomes in patients. Our study aimed to evaluate the performance of the modified-EUCAST (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing) rapid direct AST on urine samples. Methods: From >2,000 urine samples, a total of 128 urine samples containing bacterial counts of ≥2 × 104 CFU/mL with a uniform bacterial shape were initially included based on flow cytometry (Sysmex UF-1000i, Japan) and Gram staining, respectively. A total of 103 samples showing the presence of Enterobacteriaceae were finally selected in this study. The urine samples were directly inoculated on Mueller-Hinton agar, which was used in the current EUCAST rapid direct AST on blood samples. The size of the growth inhibition zones around antimicrobial disks was measured using a digital scanner (BIOMIC vision analyzer, Giles scientific, USA) and further confirmed by visualization with naked eyes after incubation for 4, 6, and 8 hours. The AST interpretations were compared to those of the conventional VITEK 2 AST system (bioMérieux, France) and the discrepancies between both tests were confirmed with the E-test. Results: The antibiotics, namely ampicillin, cefazolin, aztreonam, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, cefoxitin, cefepime, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, and cotrimoxazole showed excellent correlations with modified-EUCAST rapid direct test and conventional ASTs with >0.75 weighted kappa values. The categorical agreement of the rapid direct AST was 1,442 (93.3%), with 76 (4.9%) minor error, 9 (0.6%) major error and 18 (1.2%) very major error, implicating the reliability of this method for clinical application. Conclusion: Performing the modified-EUCAST rapid direct AST on urine samples can predict reliable AST results within 8 hours. The rapid direct AST can help the physicians to initiate adequate antimicrobial treatment for urinary tract infections.