Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) technology represents one of the most promising additive manufacturing methods, enabling the production of components with high geometric complexity and a wide range of industrial and biomedical applications. In this study, the influence of both standard and high-productivity process parameters on the microstructure, porosity, surface roughness, and hardness of three commonly used materials, stainless steel 316L, aluminum alloy AlSi10Mg, and titanium alloy Ti6Al4V, was analyzed. The investigations were carried out on samples fabricated using the EOS M290 system, and their characterization was performed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM), electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD), porosity analysis by point counting, Vickers hardness measurements, and optical profilometry. The obtained results revealed significant differences depending on the alloy and the applied parameters. For stainless steel 316L, the high-productivity variant led to grain refinement and stronger crystallographic orientation, albeit at the expense of increased porosity (0.11% vs. 0.05% for the standard variant). In the case of AlSi10Mg alloy, high-productivity parameters enabled a substantial reduction in porosity (from 0.82% to 0.27%) accompanied by an increase in hardness (from 115 HV1 to 122 HV1), highlighting their particular suitability for engineering applications. For the Ti6Al4V alloy, a decrease in porosity (from 0.17% to 0.07%) was observed; however, the increase in mechanical anisotropy resulting from a stronger texture may limit its application in cases requiring isotropic material behavior. The presented research confirms that optimization of LPBF parameters must be strictly tailored to the specific alloy and intended application, ranging from industrial components to biomedical implants. The results provide a foundation for further studies on the relationship between microstructure and functional properties, as well as for the development of hybrid strategies and predictive models of the LPBF process.

From modern alloys, increasingly demanding combinations of properties are expected, enabling their use as structural materials in new areas of application such as the energy industry (Liquid Natural Gas and hydrogen tanks), military, or space. One of the fundamental expectations for constructional materials used in these sectors is high energy absorption capacity while maintaining high strength (often at low temperatures where e.g. conventional steels exhibit brittleness). Simultaneously, they require appropriate plastic deformation susceptibility (formability) and other additional parameters (e.g., corrosion resistance, weldability, fatigue resistance). Designing manufacturing technologies for the metal forming of structural elements from modern engineering materials for the aforementioned applications requires a holistic approach and understanding of the relationships between process parameters (time, temperature, deformation, strain rate), microstructural phenomena (recovery/strengthening mechanisms, phase transformations, precipitation processes), and resulting properties (strength, ductility, toughness). In this work I will provide a practical example of designing specific properties of (CoNiFeMn)1-xMox high entropy alloys by controlling microstructure development at each stage of the metal forming process. The role of recrystallisation, grain growth, and the precipitation of the phase in controlling grain size - a key parameter defining the susceptibility to twinning/nanotwinning in this alloy at cryogenic temperatures - will be discussed.

Three variants of high-entropy alloys (HEAs) from the AlCoCuFeNi group, containing different amounts of Al and Cu, were developed and produced via induction melting and casting into ceramic moulds. The ingots were homogenized at 1000 °C for 10 h. Analyses revealed that variations in Al and Cu concentrations led to significant changes in the material’s microstructure, hardness, strength, and impact strength. In the equiatomic variant, differential scanning calorimetry revealed a peak associated with the phase transformation, indicating that this alloy’s microstructure consists of two distinct phases. In contrast, when the concentrations of Al and Cu are reduced, a single-phase microstructure is observed. The equiatomic variant (used as a reference) is characterized by its hardness and brittleness, exhibiting slight ductility, with a tensile strength of 80 MPa, a hardness of 400 HV5, and an impact strength of 1.9 J/cm². However, with adjusted Al contents of 1/2 and Cu contents of 1/4, the alloy displays exceptional strength combined with good plasticity, achieving a tensile strength of up to 450 MPa with 60% elongation, and an impact strength of 215 J/cm². The non-equiatomic variants exhibit a comparatively more straightforward microstructure and enhanced ductility, which may facilitate easier processing of these alloys. Fractography investigation revealed a ductile mode of fracture in the samples.