Introduction. Peri-implant femoral fractures (PIFF) are defined as fractures of the femur with the presence of previously implanted non-prosthetic osteosynthetic material. A review of available literature revealed that there are several proposed classifications and sets of guidelines for surgical treatment of PIFF. Case outline. A 49-year-old patient was injured from a fall on the same level, the day before admission to the hospital. The anamnesis at admission showed that six months earlier, he had sustained a pertrochanteric fracture of the left femur, which had been treated surgically with a short cephalomedullary nail. Two years prior to hospital admission, the patient had sustained a tibial plateau fracture of the same leg, which was treated non-surgically with above the knee cast immobilization. After the fracture had healed, paresis of the peroneal nerve was diagnosed, while subsequent follow-up revealed secondary post-traumatic arthrosis of the knee joint. Reduction and fixation of the fracture was performed on a surgical extension table, with the use of fluoroscopy. Previously implanted osteosynthetic material was removed, a short cephalomedullary nail, and fixation of the fracture was carried out with a long cephalomedullary nail. Six months after the operation, the patient can ambulate independently, without assistance. He reports no pain in the left groin and upper leg but reports pain and limitation of movement in the left knee joint. Conclusion. By reviewing the available literature, we found that the patient was cared for in our hospital in keeping with all current recommendations for surgical treatment of this type of fracture.

Background and Objectives: Despite the high rate of donor site morbidity, a bone–patellar tendon–bone (BPTB) graft remains the gold standard when choosing a graft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Damage to the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve (IPBSN) during graft harvesting results in sensory deficits. Despite its high occurrence in the postoperative period, many patients go untreated, leading to a lower quality of life and potential professional impairment. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of PRF therapy in alleviating sensory deficits and enhancing sensory nerve function in patients who have undergone BTB ACL reconstruction. Materials and Methods: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Name of registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Trial registration number: NCT07257666; Date of registration: 2 December 2025; Study start date: 7 January 2022). Over a one-year period, the pilot study enrolled 53 patients, treated them with BPTB ACL reconstruction, and divided them into two groups. The testing group’s donor site and subcutaneous tissue were treated with Vivostat^® PRF, whereas the standard group’s donor site and subcutaneous tissue remained untreated. The primary outcome measured was a reduction in the subjective numbness, which was tested during follow-up checks. Secondary outcomes included the evaluation of subjective knee scores for functional recovery, reported by the patients on control exams. Results: The use of Vivostat^® PRF resulted in a statistically significant reduction in sensory deficit among the groups at eight months (p < 0.05) and twelve months (p < 0.01) following surgery, favoring the testing group. The most substantial decrease in symptomatic patients was observed between four and eight months post-surgery, with no statistically significant difference found between the eight- and twelve-month follow-ups (p > 0.05). Evaluations of subjective knee function and activity scores showed no statistically significant differences between the groups. Conclusions: Using Vivostat^® PRF helps reduce sensory impairment in the area and minimizes donor site morbidity after BPTB ACL reconstruction.

Introduction. Joint dislocation is the loss of congruence of the joint surfaces. This is a relatively common injury of the musculoskeletal injury. Among the large joints, shoulder joint dislocation has the highest incidence of 24/100,000/year, of which 94?97% are anterior, 1% are inferior, and the remaining injuries are posterior shoulder dislocations. The second most frequent injury is elbow dislocation, with an incidence of 5.2/100,000/year. Among these, over 80% are posterolateral dislocations. Case outline. A 57-year-old female patient was injured during an accidental ground-level fall sustaining combined injuries ? anterior dislocation of the shoulder joint and a posterolateral dislocation of the elbow joint. Upon sustaining the described injuries, she was treated conservatively with good functional results. Conclusion. A review of the literature reveals that the combination of ipsilateral shoulder and elbow joint dislocations is a rare injury, with shoulder dislocation often being overlooked. Proper anamnesis, along with a thorough examination of the joints both proximally and distally to the injured joint, is crucial. If performed adequately, these injuries can often be successfully managed nonoperatively, with closed reduction, immobilization, and rehabilitation, leading to satisfactory functional recovery.