Esther Hernandez-Montes

Dr. Esther Hernandez-Montes


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 August 2017 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SPSuyoung Park
Suyoung Park
Dongryeol RyuDongryeol Ryu
Dongryeol Ryu
Sigfredo FuentesSigfredo Fuentes
Sigfredo Fuentes
HCHoam Chung
Hoam Chung
EHEsther Hernandez-Montes
Esther Hernandez-Montes
MOMark O’connell
Mark O’connell
The capability to monitor water status from crops on a regular basis can enhance productivity and water use efficiency. In this paper, high-resolution thermal imagery acquired by an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) was used to map plant water stress and its spatial variability, including sectors under full irrigation and deficit irrigation over nectarine and peach orchards at 6.12 cm ground sample distance. The study site was classified into sub-regions based on crop properties, such as cultivars and tree training systems. In order to enhance the accuracy of the mapping, edge extraction and filtering were conducted prior to the probability modelling employed to obtain crop-property-specific (‘adaptive’ hereafter) lower and higher temperature references (Twet and Tdry respectively). Direct measurements of stem water potential (SWP, ψstem) and stomatal conductance (gs) were collected concurrently with UAV remote sensing and used to validate the thermal index as crop biophysical parameters. The adaptive crop water stress index (CWSI) presented a better agreement with both ψstem and gs with determination coefficients (R2) of 0.72 and 0.82, respectively, while the conventional CWSI applied by a single set of hot and cold references resulted in biased estimates with R2 of 0.27 and 0.34, respectively. Using a small number of ground-based measurements of SWP, CWSI was converted to a high-resolution SWP map to visualize spatial distribution of the water status at field scale. The results have important implications for the optimal management of irrigation for crops.

8 December 2020 in Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Diana MarínDiana Marín
Diana Marín
Josep ArmengolJosep Armengol
Josep Armengol
PCPablo Carbonell-Bejerano
Pablo Carbonell-Bejerano
Jose EscalonaJose Escalona
Jose Escalona
David GramajeDavid Gramaje
David Gramaje
FHFelicidad de Herralde
Felicidad de Herralde
Viticulture is facing emerging challenges not only because of the effect of climate change on yield and composition of grapes, but also of a social demand for environmental‐friendly agricultural management. Adaptation to these challenges is essential to guarantee the sustainability of viticulture. The aim of this review is to present adaptation possibilities from the soil‐hidden, and often disregarded, part of the grapevine, the roots. The complexity of soil–root interactions makes necessary a comprehensive approach taking into account physiology, pathology and genetics, in order to outline strategies to improve viticulture adaptation to current and future threats. Rootstocks are the link between soil and scion in grafted crops, and they have played an essential role in viticulture since the introduction of phylloxera into Europe at the end of the 19th century. This review outlines current and future challenges that are threatening the sustainability of the wine sector and the relevant role that rootstocks can play to face these threats. We describe how rootstocks along with soil management can be exploited as an essential tool to deal with the effects of climate change and of emerging soil‐borne pests and pathogens. Moreover, we discuss the possibilities and limitations of diverse genetic strategies for rootstock breeding.

1 March 2016 in Agricultural Water Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAmani Bchir
Amani Bchir
JEJosé M. Escalona
José M. Escalona
AGAlexander Gallé
Alexander Gallé
EHEsther Hernandez-Montes
Esther Hernandez-Montes
ITIgnacio Tortosa
Ignacio Tortosa
HMHipolito Medrano
Hipolito Medrano

1 August 2018 in Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Sigfredo FuentesSigfredo Fuentes
Sigfredo Fuentes
EHEsther Hernandez-Montes
Esther Hernandez-Montes
JEJ.M. Escalona
J.M. Escalona
Josefina BotaJosefina Bota
Josefina Bota
Claudia Gonzalez ViejoClaudia Gonzalez Viejo
Claudia Gonzalez Viejo
HMH. Medrano
H. Medrano

16 November 2021 in Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PLP.P. Lehr
P.P. Lehr
EHEsther Hernandez-Montes
Esther Hernandez-Montes
JLJ. Ludwig‐Müller
J. Ludwig‐Müller
MKM. Keller
M. Keller
Christian ZörbChristian Zörb
Christian Zörb
Background and Aims Viticulture will be particularly affected by increasing drought and heat waves in the future. It is of interest to find traits that indicate stress before symptoms become apparent. We investigated whether the commonly used traits, proline and abscisic acid (ABA) biosynthesis, are suitable markers for heat, drought or combined stress and whether gene expression of key enzymes of ABA biosynthesis is regulated in grapevine leaves under these stress conditions. Methods and Results Plant growth and gas exchange were measured to evaluate plant reactions to increased temperature and water deficit. Proline and ABA concentration in leaf material was measured, respectively, photometrically and with GC/MS. Gene expression analysis of NCED1, NCED2 and P5CS was done by real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Drought stress had a stronger effect on growth, gas exchange, proline, and ABA biosynthesis than heat stress. An interaction between heat and drought stress was observed for gas exchange and for proline biosynthesis. Conclusions Proline concentration and gene expression of P5CS are good markers for combined stress. The concentration of ABA is a suitable marker for drought stress and might be a suitable marker for combined stress. Gene expression of NCED1 in leaves was a good marker for drought stress and might be a suitable marker for combined stress, whereas NCED2 was not suitable. Significance of the Study These results provide insight into the response of grapevines to heat, drought and combined stress and show the suitability of ABA and proline as stress markers.

12 November 2018 in Frontiers in Plant Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CDCyril Douthe
Cyril Douthe
HMHipólito Medrano
Hipólito Medrano
ITIgnacio Tortosa
Ignacio Tortosa
JEJose Mariano Escalona
Jose Mariano Escalona
EHEsther Hernandez-Montes
Esther Hernandez-Montes
APAlicia Pou
Alicia Pou
Water scarcity is a main challenge in vineyards sustainability in most of the grapevine areas now and even more in near future due to climatic change perspectives. In consequence, water use efficiency (WUE) measurements are of the highest interest to improve the sustainability of this crop. The vast majority of WUE measurements relays on measurements of leaf carbon and water fluxes at leaf-level. However, less data are available at the whole-plant level, and for the moment those data are not totally coincident with conclusions reached at leaf scale. In this study, we used whole-plant chambers able to enclose an entire plant of 12 years old to measure at the same time water and carbon fluxes under realistic field grown conditions. The main objectives were to identify the technical issues interfering the whole-plant measurements and track the environmental and other abiotic factors that can affect water and carbon balance, i.e., WUE at the whole-plant scale. To achieve those objectives, we measured whole-plant water and carbon fluxes in grapevine exposed to two different water regimes at three phenological stages [pea size (July), ripening (August), and harvest (September)]. In September, measurements were repeated under high CO2 to also check its effect at the whole-plant scale. The results indicate that water and carbon fluxes are well coordinated under both water availability treatments. Under drought conditions, both fluxes were drastically reduced, but surprisingly the estimated WUE resulted not improved but decreased, contrarily to what is shown at the leaf scale. The phenology (September) also strongly decreased both water and carbon fluxes when compared to measurements in July. We hypostatized that harvest load respiration rates could have an important weight on the whole-plant net carbon exchange (NCE). Finally, high CO2 measurements, after correction for leaks, indicated an increase of whole-plant NCE as well as increased whole-plant WUE, as expected. Several technical issues were identified, like 1/instability of [CO2] during the night period that prevent robust estimation of whole-plant respiration and 2/condensation during last night and sun-rise hours which may affect the estimation of daily plant transpiration.