Sruthi S

Dr. Sruthi S

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2024 in Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSwathi S
Swathi S
PSPradeep Solete
Pradeep Solete
DADelphine Priscilla Antony
Delphine Priscilla Antony
KTKavalipurapu Venkata Teja
Kavalipurapu Venkata Teja
ASAdimulapu Hima Sandeep
Adimulapu Hima Sandeep
Giuseppe MinerviniGiuseppe Minervini
Giuseppe Minervini
To analyze the remaining dentin thickness and crack formation after retreatment, comparing three file systems.

21 November 2025 in Dentistry Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSruthi S
Sruthi S
PSPradeep Solete
Pradeep Solete
DADelphine Priscilla Antony
Delphine Priscilla Antony
SSSwathi S
Swathi S
SRSurendar Ramamoorthi
Surendar Ramamoorthi
Massimo Del FabbroMassimo Del Fabbro
Massimo Del Fabbro
Background/Objectives: Non-surgical retreatment aims to remove infected filling material, prepare the canal for disinfection, and re-obturate. This ex vivo study evaluated the residual filling material and dentin volume removed after retreatment using a rotary or reciprocating system. Methods: Twenty mesial roots of mandibular molars with two independent, straight canals were decoronated to a 16 mm working length and obturated. Pre-operative nano-CT scans measured the initial dentin and filling material volumes. Specimens were randomly assigned to two groups: Solite RE Black system (RE1-30/0.08; RE2-20/0.06) and WaveOne Gold—small file (20/0.07). Post-operative nano-CT scans were superimposed to calculate the remaining filling material and dentin volume removed. Data are presented as the mean ± SD, and groups were compared using independent t-tests. Results: Neither system completely removed the intracanal filling material. The mean residual filling material volume was 1.42 ± 0.21 mm3 (Solite RE Black) vs. 1.56 ± 0.27 mm3 (WaveOne Gold), representing approximately 14% vs. 16% of the initial filling material, respectively (p < 0.05). Mean dentin volume removed was 0.95 ± 0.18 mm3 vs. 1.12 ± 0.22 mm3, with no significant difference (p > 0.05). Conclusions: In single-rooted, straight canals, Solite RE Black removed more filling material than WaveOne Gold, while dentin loss was similar. These findings are specific to straight canals, and further studies are required for curved or multi-rooted teeth.