David Chew

Prof. David Chew

Department of Geology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2014 in Chemical Geology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DCDavid Chew
David Chew
JPJoseph Petrus
Joseph Petrus
Balz Samuel KamberBalz Samuel Kamber
Balz Samuel Kamber

1 January 2011 in Chemical Geology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DCDavid Chew
David Chew
PSPaul J. Sylvester
Paul J. Sylvester
MTMike N. Tubrett
Mike N. Tubrett

1 October 2014 in Chemical Geology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YYYue-Heng Yang
Yue-Heng Yang
FWFu-Yuan Wu
Fu-Yuan Wu
JYJin-Hui Yang
Jin-Hui Yang
DCDavid Chew
David Chew
LXLie-Wen Xie
Lie-Wen Xie
CHChao Huang
Chao Huang

1 February 2020 in Earth-Science Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GOGary O'SUllivan
Gary O'SUllivan
DCDavid Chew
David Chew
GKGavin Kenny
Gavin Kenny
IHIsadora Henrichs
Isadora Henrichs
DMDónal Mulligan
Dónal Mulligan

9 April 2020 in Geochronology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Nick RobertsNick Roberts
Nick Roberts
KDKerstin Drost
Kerstin Drost
MHMatthew S. A. Horstwood
Matthew S. A. Horstwood
DCDaniel J. Condon
Daniel J. Condon
DCDavid Chew
David Chew
JLJack K. Lee
Jack K. Lee
Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) U–Pb geochronology of carbonate minerals, calcite in particular, is rapidly gaining popularity as an absolute dating method. The high spatial resolution of LA-ICP-MS U–Pb carbonate geochronology has benefits over traditional isotope dilution methods, particularly for diagenetic and hydrothermal calcite, because uranium and lead are heterogeneously distributed on the sub-millimetre scale. At the same time, this can provide limitations to the method, as locating zones of radiogenic lead can be time-consuming and “hit or miss”. Here, we present strategies for dating carbonates with in situ techniques, through imaging and petrographic techniques to data interpretation; our examples are drawn from the dating of fracture-filling calcite, but our discussion is relevant to all carbonate applications. We review several limitations to the method, including open-system behaviour, variable initial-lead compositions, and U–daughter disequilibrium. We also discuss two approaches to data collection: traditional spot analyses guided by petrographic and elemental imaging and image-based dating that utilises LA-ICP-MS elemental and isotopic map data.

1 June 2015 in Elements
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DCDavid Chew
David Chew
Richard SpikingsRichard Spikings
Richard Spikings
Apatite can provide geologists with an exceptionally wide range of ages and temperatures to investigate processes that operate from Earth's surface right down to the lower crust. Apatite is a widespread accessory mineral in igneous, metamorphic, and clastic sedimentary rocks and can be dated using four radioactive decay schemes, each with a different temperature window for isotopic closure: Lu–Hf (675–750 °C); U–Pb (350–550 °C); apatite fission track (60–110 °C); (U–Th)/He (40–80 °C). The fission-track and (U–Th)/He methods are popular for studying upper-crustal and near-surface processes, whereas the U–Pb and Lu–Hf systems are used to investigate the thermal, tectonic, and magmatic histories of the deeper crust.