Previous evidence associates insulin resistance with arterial stiffness in various pathologies, yet limited reports exist in healthy adults. Therefore, this study aims to estimate the association between insulin resistance and arterial stiffness in healthy adults. The cross-sectional EVasCu study enrolled 390 participants (42.05 ± 13.15 years). ANCOVAs, unadjusted (model 1) and adjusted (model 2), explored the association between arterial stiffness markers (aortic Pulse Wave Velocity [aPWV], Augmentation Index [AIx@75] and Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index [CAVI]), and insulin resistance markers (Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance [HOMA-IR], Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index [QUICKI] and Triglycerides-Glucose [TyG]). In model 1, all insulin resistance markers were associated with aPWV, HOMA-IR and QUICKI were associated with AIx@75, and the TyG index was associated with CAVI. In model 2, HOMA-IR and QUICKI increased aPWV by 0.179 and 0.156 m/s (p = 0.001 and p = 0.011), and AIx@75 by 4.17 and 5.39% (p = 0.009 and p = 0.003). The EVasCu study offers valuable insights into the relationship between insulin resistance and arterial stiffness in healthy adults, providing a deeper understanding of metabolic and cardiovascular health. By examining this influence, we embark on an intriguing exploration of how these factors interplay in the human body.

(1) Background: Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for approximately 50% of all patients with HF. In the absence of pharmacological treatments that have been successful in reducing mortality or morbidity in this pathology, physical exercise is recognized as an important adjunct in the treatment of HF. Therefore, the objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of combined training and high intensity interval training (HIIT) on exercise capacity, diastolic function, endothelial function, and arterial stiffness in participants with HFpEF. (2) Methods: The ExIC-FEp study will be a single-blind, 3-arm, randomized clinical trial (RCT) conducted at the Health and Social Research Center of the University of Castilla-La Mancha. Participants with HFpEF will be randomly assigned (1:1:1) to the combined exercise, HIIT or control group to evaluate the efficacy of physical exercise programs on exercise capacity, diastolic function, endothelial function, and arterial stiffness. All participants will be examined at baseline, at three months and at six months. (3) Results: The findings of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. (4) Conclusions: This RCT will represent a significant advance in the available scientific evidence on the efficacy of physical exercise in the treatment of HFpEF.

Background/Objectives: The 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20) was approved for use in children and infants on the basis of studies comparing its safety and immunogenicity with those of the 13-valent vaccine (PCV13). PCV20 offers expanded coverage of seven additional serotypes. This meta-analysis aimed to summarize the available evidence on the comparative immunogenicity between PCV20 and PCV13. Methods: A systematic search of the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases was conducted in September 2024. The following inclusion criteria were used: (i) design: randomized clinical trials; (ii) outcomes: studies that included immunogenicity outcomes; (iii) compared vaccines: any study directly comparing the immunogenicity of PCV20 and PCV13; and (iv) population: infant population <2 years of age. No language or temporal restrictions were applied in the study. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted via the Hartung–Knapp–Sidik–Jonkman method, with subgroup analyses according to the serotype and vaccination schedule (3 + 1 and 2 + 1). We used the revised Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool (RoB 2.0) to assess the risk of bias. The following parameters of immunogenicity were estimated: (i) the pooled geometric mean ratio (GMR PCV20/PCV13) of serotype-specific pneumococcal anticapsular antibodies, (ii) the pooled difference (PCV20-PCV13) in the percentage (DP) of participants who achieved predefined antibody levels for each serotype, and (iii) the pooled geometric mean titres (GMTs) of serotype-specific opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) in PCV20 and PCV13, along with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Results: Four studies (4093 infants aged 42–180 days) that compared the PCV20 and PCV13 vaccines, published between 2021 and 2024, were included in this meta-analysis. The immunogenicity of both groups was compared one month after the primary series and one month after the booster dose. The pooled results indicated that PCV20 elicited lower immune responses for the 13 serotypes shared with PCV13, according to the GMR and OPA outcomes. For the DP outcome, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups. Immune responses were higher for the additional serotypes in the PCV20 group; however, these differences were not statistically significant for all serotypes. Conclusions: This meta-analysis offers an overview of the evidence on the comparative immunogenicity of PCV20 and PCV13. Although some outcomes indicate that PCV20 elicits lower immune responses for the 13 serotypes shared with PCV13, it provides immunity against seven additional serotypes associated with IPD. Further studies are warranted to strengthen the evidence base, and continuous IPD surveillance remains essential to monitor shifts in serotype prevalence, assess the impact of current and future vaccines, and guide vaccine policy recommendations.