Introduction COVID-19 vaccines were rapidly authorised, thus requiring intense post-marketing re-evaluation of their benefit-risk profile. A multi-national European collaboration was established with the aim to prospectively monitor safety of the COVID-19 vaccines through web-based survey of vaccinees. Methods A prospective cohort event monitoring study was conducted with primary consented data collection in seven European countries. Through the web applications, participants received and completed baseline and up to six follow-up questionnaires on self-reported adverse reactions for at least 6 months following the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine (Netherlands, France, Belgium, UK, Italy) and baseline and up to ten follow-up questionnaires for one year in Germany and Croatia. Rates of adverse reactions have been described by type (solicited, non-solicited; serious/non-serious; and adverse events of special interest) and stratified by vaccine brand. We calculated the frequency of adverse reaction after dose 1 and prior to dose 2 among all vaccinees who completed at least one follow-up questionnaire. Results Overall, 117,791 participants were included and completed the first questionnaire in addition to the baseline: 88,196 (74.9%) from Germany, 27,588 (23.4%) from Netherlands, 984 (0.8%) from France, 570 (0.5%) from Italy, 326 (0.3%) from Croatia, 89 (0.1%) from the UK and 38 (0.03%) from Belgium. There were 89,377 (75.9%) respondents who had received AstraZeneca vaccines, 14,658 (12.4%) BioNTech/Pfizer, 11,266 (9.6%) Moderna and 2490 (2.1%) Janssen vaccines as a first dose. Median age category was 40–49 years for all vaccines except for Pfizer where median age was 70–79 years. Most vaccinees were female with a female-to-male ratio of 1.34, 1.96 and 2.50 for AstraZeneca, Moderna and Janssen, respectively. BioNtech/Pfizer had slightly more men with a ratio of 0.82. Fatigue and headache were the most commonly reported solicited systemic adverse reactions and injection-site pain was the most common solicited local reaction. The rates of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) were 0.1–0.2% across all vaccine brands. Conclusion This large-scale prospective study of COVID-19 vaccine recipients showed, for all the studied vaccines, a high frequency of systemic reactions, related to the immunogenic response, and local reactions at the injection site, while serious reactions or AESIs were uncommon, consistent with those reported on product labels. This study demonstrated the feasibility of setting up and conducting cohort event monitoring across multiple European countries to collect safety data on novel vaccines that are rolled out at scale in populations which may not have been included in pivotal trials.

In all pivotal trials of COVID-19 vaccines, the history of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection was mentioned as one of the main exclusion criteria. In the absence of clinical trials, observational studies are the primary source for evidence generation. This study aims to describe the patient-reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) following the first COVID-19 vaccination cycle, as well as the administration of booster doses of different vaccine brands, in people with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, as compared to prior infection-free matched cohorts of vaccinees. A web-based prospective study was conducted collecting vaccinee-reported outcomes through electronic questionnaires from eleven European countries in the period February 2021–February 2023. A baseline questionnaire and up to six follow-up questionnaires collected data on the vaccinee’s characteristics, as well as solicited and unsolicited adverse reactions. Overall, 3886 and 902 vaccinees with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection and having received the first dose or a booster dose, respectively, were included in the analysis. After the first dose or booster dose, vaccinees with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection reported at least one ADR at a higher frequency than those matched without prior infection (3470 [89.6%] vs. 2916 [75.3%], and 614 [68.2%] vs. 546 [60.6%], respectively). On the contrary side, after the second dose, vaccinees with a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection reported at least one ADR at a lower frequency, compared to matched controls (1443 [85.0%] vs. 1543 [90.9%]). The median time to onset and the median time to recovery were similar across all doses and cohorts. The frequency of adverse reactions was higher in individuals with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection who received Vaxzevria as the first dose and Spikevax as the second and booster doses. The frequency of serious ADRs was low for all doses and cohorts. Data from this large-scale prospective study of COVID-19 vaccinees could be used to inform people as to the likelihood of adverse effects based on their history of SARS-CoV-2 infection, age, sex, and the type of vaccine administered. In line with pivotal trials, the safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines was also confirmed in people with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Background/Objectives: The aim of this study was to systematically assess Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFI) among children following administration of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine (Cervarix^®) included in the Dutch National Immunization Program (NIP) and to characterize the pattern and recurrence risk of AEFI after HPV revaccination. Methods: A longitudinal cohort event monitoring study, using patient-reported outcomes was used among recipients of the HPV vaccine at 10 years of age. Data were available for 3063 children following the first HPV vaccination and for 2209 children following the second HPV vaccination. Results: The most commonly reported AEFI following HPV vaccination were injection site reactions—reported by 46.5% of participants after the first dose and 31.9% after the second dose—followed by headache (8.2% and 3.9%, respectively) and joint pain (4.5% and 3.7%, respectively). Participants who received both HPV vaccine doses reported more AEFI after the first dose than after the second. Among girls, 61.2% reported at least one AEFI following the first dose, compared to 44.2% after the second dose. For boys, these percentages were 55.3% and 38.5%, respectively. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.002). For some AEFI, such as injection site reactions, there appears to be a potential increased risk of recurrence following the second dose. Conclusions: This prospective longitudinal cohort event monitoring study showed that AEFI were more frequent after the first HPV dose and more frequent for girls compared to boys. An increased risk of recurrence was seen for AEFI, such as injection site reactions and headache. Furthermore, this study provides insight into the course of AEFI and the extent to which children were affected by these symptoms based on real-world data.

Background: Conventional vaccines rarely cause severe allergic reactions. However, the rapid development and approval of COVID-19 vaccines left limited initial data on their adverse reactions, particularly in individuals with a history of allergy. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the safety profile of different doses and brands of COVID-19 vaccines in subjects with a history of allergy vs. those without a history of allergy. Methods: From February 2021 to February 2023, a web-based prospective study gathered vaccinee-reported outcomes using electronic questionnaires across eleven European countries. Baseline and up to six follow-up questionnaires captured data on vaccinee demographics, as well as both solicited and unsolicited adverse reactions. Results: Overall, 3476 vaccinees with a history of allergy were matched with 13,872 vaccinees from the general population at the first vaccination cycle and were included in the analysis. A total of 825 vaccinees with a history of allergy who had received a booster dose, matched to 3297 vaccinees from the general population, were included in the analysis. Higher rates of ADRs occurred after the first vaccination cycle compared to after the booster dose (64–91% vs. 56–79%). However, most reported ADRs were solicited and not serious, and no case of anaphylaxis was reported. Women and vaccinees with a history of allergy reported ADRs more frequently than men and the matched controls, respectively. Compared to other COVID-19 vaccines, a higher proportion of vaccinees experiencing at least one ADR following their first vaccination cycle was observed with Comirnaty and Vaxzevria. Statistically significant differences were observed among the study cohorts for median TTO after the second dose, and for median TTR following the first vaccination cycle and booster dose (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Typically, any drug or vaccine use carries a risk of severe allergic reactions, yet the benefits of vaccination generally outweigh these potential risks, as shown with the COVID-19 vaccines.

Background/Objectives: The Dutch National Immunisation Programme (NIP) aims to protect children against severe infectious diseases. As with all vaccines, adverse events following immunisation (AEFIs) may occur with the use of vaccines in the NIP. Safety of the vaccines is monitored by The Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb. This study aimed to systematically document AEFIs following administration of the MMR and DT-IPV vaccines, which are given simultaneously at the age of 9 years. Methods: A cohort event monitoring (CEM) study was performed, employing a longitudinal cohort design. Parents or guardians of 9-year-olds receiving the MMR and DT-IPV vaccines completed questionnaires following vaccination to report the presence or absence of AEFI. Results: AEFIs were reported for more than 73% of children given an MMR and DT-IPV vaccination. The great majority of the reported reactions were non-serious and self-limiting and consistent with those listed in the official product information for the MMR and DT-IPV vaccines. Injection site reactions were significantly more frequent at the site of the DT-IPV vaccination than the MMR vaccination. AEFIs were mostly perceived as little or moderately burdensome. Conclusions: AEFIs very frequently occurred after MMR and DT-IPV vaccination. This study provides further insight into the timing and duration of AEFIs after MMR and DT-IPV vaccination. In addition, detailed insight into the adverse event profile of these vaccines is provided, which helps to set realistic expectations for children and their parents or caretakers who follow the NIP and helps health professionals in their communication regarding AEFIs.