Xiaodong Su

Xiaodong Su


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 October 2020 in GigaScience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FCFrancesca Pia Caruso
Francesca Pia Caruso
LGLuciano Garofano
Luciano Garofano
FDFulvio D'Angelo
Fulvio D'Angelo
KYKai Yu
Kai Yu
FTFuchou Tang
Fuchou Tang
MCMichele Ceccarelli
Michele Ceccarelli
Background: Single-cell RNA sequencing is the reference technique for characterizing the heterogeneity of the tumor microenvironment. The composition of the various cell types making up the microenvironment can significantly affect the way in which the immune system activates cancer rejection mechanisms. Understanding the cross-talk signals between immune cells and cancer cells is of fundamental importance for the identification of immuno-oncology therapeutic targets. Results: We present a novel method, single-cell Tumor–Host Interaction tool (scTHI), to identify significantly activated ligand–receptor interactions across clusters of cells from single-cell RNA sequencing data. We apply our approach to uncover the ligand–receptor interactions in glioma using 6 publicly available human glioma datasets encompassing 57,060 gene expression profiles from 71 patients. By leveraging this large-scale collection we show that unexpected cross-talk partners are highly conserved across different datasets in the majority of the tumor samples. This suggests that shared cross-talk mechanisms exist in glioma. Conclusions: Our results provide a complete map of the active tumor–host interaction pairs in glioma that can be therapeutically exploited to reduce the immunosuppressive action of the microenvironment in brain tumor.

24 June 2023 in Journal of Translational Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GYGuozhen Yang
Guozhen Yang
XSXiaodong Su
Xiaodong Su
YHYuanheng Huang
Yuanheng Huang
GLGuangyu Luo
Guangyu Luo
ZWZhiqiang Wang
Zhiqiang Wang
XZXu Zhang
Xu Zhang
Background: Two cycles of neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy induced favorable pathological response and tolerant toxicity in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, approximately 25% of patients relapsed within 1 year after surgery, indicating that a short course of treatment may not be sufficient. Therefore, exploring the effects of intensive treatment is needed for optimal clinical outcomes. Methods: Locally advanced ESCC patients were administered three cycles of camrelizumab plus nab-paclitaxel and capecitabine, followed by thoracoscopic esophagectomy. The primary endpoint was pathologic response. Secondary endpoints included safety, feasibility, radiologic response, survival outcomes, and immunologic/genomic correlates of efficacy. Results: Forty-seven patients were enrolled in the study. Forty-two patients received surgery, and R0 resection was achieved in all cases. The complete and major pathological response rates were 33.3% and 64.3%, respectively, and the objective response rate was 80.0%. Three cycles of treatment significantly improved T down-staging compared to two cycles (P = 0.03). The most common treatment-related adverse events were grades 1–2, and no surgical delay was reported. With a median follow-up of 24.3 months, the 1-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates were both 97.6%, and the 2-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 92.3% and 97.6%, respectively. Three patients experienced disease recurrence or metastasis ranging from 12.5 to 25.8 months after surgery, and one patient died 6 months after surgery due to cardiovascular disease. Neither programmed death-ligand 1 expression nor tumor mutational burden was associated with pathological response. An increased infiltration of CD56dim natural killer cells in the pretreatment tumor was correlated with better pathological response in the primary tumor. Conclusions: It seems probable that intensive cycles of neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus nab-paclitaxel and capecitabine increased tumor regression and improved survival outcomes. Randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are needed to validate these findings. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000029807, Registered February 14, 2020, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=49459.

12 November 2021 in Thoracic Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JZJiudi Zhong
Jiudi Zhong
SZSiwen Zhang
Siwen Zhang
CLChuangzhen Li
Chuangzhen Li
YHYi Hu
Yi Hu
WWWeijin Wei
Weijin Wei
XSXiaodong Su
Xiaodong Su
Background: The purpose of the study was to determine whether the active cycle of breathing technique (ACBT) has an impact on postoperative pulmonary complication (PPC) after esophagectomy.Methods: In this prospective randomized trial, patients who were candidates for esophagectomy were randomized into groups, wherein they received either ACBT (n = 146) or conventional chest physiotherapy (control group, n = 145) on postoperative days (POD) 1–3. The primary outcome was PPC. The secondary outcomes included the incidence of anastomotic leakage (AL), efficacy of airway clearance, and postoperative hospital length of stay (LOS).Results: After esophagectomy, the PPC rate was significantly lower in the ACBT group (15.2%) than in the control group (31.0%) (p = 0.001). The incidences of AL were 5.5% and 12.4% in the ACBT and control groups, respectively (p = 0.042). Mean hospital LOS was 12.3 days for the ACBT group and 16.8 days for the control group (p = 0.008). ACBT significantly increased the mean sputum wet weight (g) on POD 1–3 when compared with conventional therapy (POD 1 9.08 vs. 6.47, POD 2 16.86 vs. 10.92, POD 3 24.65 vs. 13.52, all p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that ACBT decreased the rates of PPC (odds ratio [OR] 0.403, p = 0.003), AL (OR 0.379,p = 0.038),arrhythmia (OR 0.397, p = 0.028), and bronchoscopy aspiration (OR 0.362, p = 0.016).Conclusion: ACBT is an effective airway clearance technique that significantly reduces the incidence of PPC after esophagectomy. ACBT could also significantly reduce both AL and LOS.

22 December 2016 in Lung Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
XSXiaodong Su
Xiaodong Su
HXHao-Jun Xie
Hao-Jun Xie
QLQian-Wen Liu
Qian-Wen Liu
YMYun-Xian Mo
Yun-Xian Mo
HLHao Long
Hao Long
TRTie-Hua Rong
Tie-Hua Rong

10 January 2017 in Chinese Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HXHao-Jun Xie
Hao-Jun Xie
XZXu Zhang
Xu Zhang
ZWZhen-Qiang Wei
Zhen-Qiang Wei
HLHao Long
Hao Long
TRTie-Hua Rong
Tie-Hua Rong
XSXiaodong Su
Xiaodong Su
Body mass index (BMI) has a U-shaped association with lung cancer risk. However, the effect of BMI on prognosis is controversial. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the effect of BMI on the survival of patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after surgical resection. In total, 624 consecutive stage I NSCLC patients who underwent radical resection were classified into four groups according to their BMI: underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (BMI = 18.5–22.4 kg/m2), overweight (BMI = 22.5–28.0 kg/m2), and obese (BMI > 28.0 kg/m2). The effect of BMI on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model. Postoperative complications in each group were analyzed using the Chi square test or Fisher’s exact test. A univariate analysis showed that PFS and OS were longer in the overweight group than in other groups (both P < 0.05). A multivariate analysis showed that OS was longer in the overweight group than in other groups (compared with the other three groups in combination: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30–2.68, P = 0.003; compared with the underweight group: HR = 2.24, 95% CI 1.18–4.25, P = 0.013; compared with the normal weight group: HR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.07–2.33, P = 0.022; compared with the obese group: HR = 2.87, 95% CI 1.48–5.59, P = 0.002), but PFS was similar among the groups (HR = 1.28, 95% CI 0.97–1.68, P = 0.080). A subgroup analysis showed an association between being overweight and prolonged OS in patients at stage T1a (P = 0.024), T1b (P = 0.051), and T2a (P = 0.02), as well as in patients with a non-smoking history (P = 0.001). Overweight patients had lower rates of postoperative complications, such as respiratory failure (compared with the underweight and obese groups: P = 0.014), myocardial infarction (compared with the obese group: P = 0.033), and perioperative death (compared with the other three groups: P = 0.016). Preoperative BMI is an independent prognostic factor for stage I NSCLC patients after resection, with overweight patients having a favorable prognosis.

22 August 2012 in Cancer Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YLYongbin Lin
Yongbin Lin
XSXiaodong Su
Xiaodong Su
HSHongyu Su
Hongyu Su
PLPeng Lin
Peng Lin
HLHao Long
Hao Long
Guo-Wei MaGuo-Wei Ma
Guo-Wei Ma
Smoking is well known as a risk factor for esophageal cancer, but controversial as a prognostic factor. Moreover, evidence is scarce that a dose–response relationship exists. We conducted a retrospective study on the effect and dose–response relationship of prediagnostic smoking on the postoperative disease-specific survival of patients with lymph node-negative esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We enrolled 643 patients with lymph node-negative ESCC who had undergone esophagectomy between 1990 and 2005 at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. The patients' demographic, pathological, preoperative and cancer outcome data were obtained from medical records. These data were reviewed and analyzed using life table, Kaplan–Meier analysis and multivariate Cox regression. A significant reduction in 3- and 5-year survival rates was observed in smokers with lymph node-negative ESCC compared with those in non-smokers. The 3- and 5-year survival rates were 54% and 46% for smokers, and 67% and 64% for non-drinkers, respectively (P < 0.05). Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that smoking was an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.008, hazard ratio = 1.404). Both log-rank test (P = 0.065) and multivariate analysis (P = 0.091) showed no significant difference between the survival rates of light and heavy smokers. Prediagnostic smoking is an independent prognostic factor for patients with lymph node-negative ESCC, but the dose–response relationship needs further investigation.