Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is one of the most innovative and successfully translated imaging techniques with substantial clinical and economic impacts and acceptance.1,2 OCT is a non-invasive optical analog to ultrasound (US) with significantly higher resolution () enabling three- and four-dimensional high-speed (>millions of A-scans/s) imaging with tissue penetration of up to 2 mm, closely matching that of conventional histopathology. The year 2021 marks not only the 30th birthday of OCT (assuming its initiation with the Science paper by Huang et al.3 in 1991) but also the 35th birthday of low-coherence interferometry and optical ranging in biological systems.4,5 In the last three decades, more than 75,000 OCT related papers have been published (about two thirds in ophthalmology) with continuous yearly increases of published articles.6 Breaking through the 1000 publications/year barrier was initiated in 2005/2006 with the introduction of spectral domain OCT (SD OCT). In 2020, the OCT-related scientific output was more than 7800 papers, resulting in nearly one paper every single hour on every single day of the year. Extrapolating this publishing performance, a saturation of yearly publication output at about 9500 can be expected around 2030. After 30 years, it is interesting and important to benchmark this performance with other medical imaging techniques:6 multiphoton microscopy (MPM) [including second harmonic generation (SHG) and third harmonic generation (THG)], developed about three decades before OCT,7,8 has about 50,000 publications so far; photoacoustic imaging (PAI), established in the 1970s,9,10 has about 15,000 papers; and confocal microscopy, developed in the 1940s,11,12 has about 145,000. Developed in the 1940s,13 US imaging has contributed to about 160,000 papers; positron emission tomography (PET), initiated in the 1970s,14,15 has about 175,000; computed tomography (CT), developed in the 1930s,16 has about 750,000; and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), developed in the late 1940s,17 has close to 1,000,000 publications. This dominance in publications of radiology and nuclear medicine imaging technologies is also one of the reasons why medical imaging is, in general, associated with MRI, CT, PET, or US. It is important to note, though, that from a medical imaging market perspective, optical imaging technologies dominate with 66% versus 34% for radiology and nuclear medicine imaging technologies. In addition, in the United States alone, about 450,000 physicians use primarily optical imaging techniques; 60,000 use primarily radiologic imaging; and about 130,000 use both.18