Background: Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency in children, yet timely and accurate diagnosis remains challenging due to nonspecific clinical presentations and limitations of imaging and blood tests. Saliva has emerged as a promising diagnostic medium because it is non-invasive, painless, inexpensive, and highly acceptable for pediatric patients. Salivary biomarkers may provide rapid and child-friendly adjuncts to existing diagnostic pathways. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in Ovid/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies assessing salivary biomarkers in pediatric appendicitis. Eligible studies included children with suspected or confirmed appendicitis and evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of salivary markers compared to clinical, laboratory, or imaging standards. Results: To date, only three salivary biomarkers have been investigated. Leucine-rich α-2-glycoprotein 1 (LRG1) demonstrated high specificity of 100% but low sensitivity of 35–36%, with diagnostic accuracy ranging from AUC 0.77 to 0.85. C-reactive protein (CRP) showed excellent diagnostic performance with sensitivity of 91.3% and specificity of 95.4% (AUC 0.97), and strong correlation with serum CRP (ρ = 0.96). Irisin showed sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 60% with estimated AUC around 0.75, suggesting potential as an adjunct marker but limited as a standalone test. Conclusions: Salivary biomarkers in pediatric appendicitis are promising but remain underexplored, with evidence limited to small, single-center studies totalling fewer than 300 patients. Their advantages include feasibility, tolerability, and suitability for integration into point-of-care testing. Future research should focus on multicenter validation, development of multi-marker salivary panels, and application of biosensor technologies. With further evidence, salivary diagnostics could complement existing strategies and improve the accuracy and child-friendliness of appendicitis care.

Background/Objectives: Intraoperative assessment guides the immediate postoperative management of acute appendicitis, whereas histopathological confirmation becomes available only after key clinical decisions have been made. This study evaluated the agreement between intraoperative and histopathological grading of acute appendicitis and compared their associations with postoperative outcomes, particularly length of hospital stay (LOS) and duration of antibiotic therapy. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included pediatric and adult patients who underwent appendectomy for suspected acute appendicitis at the University Hospital of Split between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2025. After exclusion criteria were applied, 2279 patients were included. Agreement between intraoperative and histopathological classifications was assessed using Cohen’s kappa and weighted kappa. Associations with postoperative outcomes were examined using Kendall’s tau correlation, bootstrap comparison between age groups, Kruskal–Wallis testing with Bonferroni-adjusted post hoc analyses, adjusted negative binomial regression for length of hospital stay, zero-inflated negative binomial regression for total antibiotic duration, and Firth penalized logistic regression for binary outcomes. Results: Overall concordance between intraoperative and histopathological grading was 74.0%. Agreement was moderate by unweighted Cohen’s kappa (0.539) and substantial by weighted kappa (0.643), with intraoperative grading more often overestimating than underestimating histopathological severity. Intraoperative severity showed stronger correlations than histopathological severity with LOS (τ = 0.347 vs. 0.207) and total duration of antibiotic therapy (τ = 0.331 vs. 0.224). Both outcomes showed a non-linear pattern, with patients with a negative appendix having a longer hospital stay and greater antibiotic exposure than those with phlegmonous appendicitis, while advanced disease was associated with the greatest treatment burden. Thirty-day readmission was uncommon and not associated with severity. Conclusions: Agreement between intraoperative and histopathological grading was moderate to substantial. Intraoperative grading showed stronger associations with immediate postoperative outcomes than histopathological grading, reflecting its role as the primary driver of clinical decision-making in the immediate postoperative period. These findings do not diminish the diagnostic value of histopathological examination, which remains essential for confirmation and detection of unexpected pathology.

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) remains a major concern in pediatric urological reconstructive surgery. Antibacterial-coated absorbable sutures like Monocryl Plus^® have been introduced to reduce SSI, but evidence in pediatric populations is limited. This study aimed to compare outcomes between Monocryl^® and Monocryl Plus^® sutures in common pediatric urological procedures. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of all children who underwent reconstructive urological surgery for hydronephrosis, vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), or hypospadias at the University Hospital of Split between January 2008 and December 2025. A total of 653 patients were included: 149 with hydronephrosis, 187 with VUR, and 317 with hypospadias. Patients were grouped based on suture type (Monocryl^® vs. Monocryl Plus^®). The primary outcome was SSI within 30 days after surgery; secondary outcomes included overall complications, reoperations, readmissions, and length of hospital stay. Results: SSI occurred less frequently with Monocryl Plus than with Monocryl (3.8% vs. 6.9%, p = 0.04). The median length of stay was shorter in the Monocryl Plus group (5 days, IQR 4–7) compared to Monocryl (6 days, IQR 5–8; p = 0.02). Overall complication rates were 6.1% vs. 10.0% (p = 0.07), early complications 4.6% vs. 8.0% (p = 0.06), and late complications 2.3% vs. 4.2% (p = 0.18), favouring Monocryl Plus but without statistical significance. Reoperation was required in 1.8% vs. 3.4% (p = 0.19), and readmission in 2.6% vs. 5.0% (p = 0.12). Subgroup analysis showed minimal differences in hydronephrosis (all p > 0.6), modest reductions in VUR (SSI 8.1% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.21), and significant differences in hypospadias (SSI 7.8% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.04; fistula 12.2% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.03). Multivariate regression confirmed Monocryl Plus as independently associated with lower odds of SSI (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.30–0.98, p = 0.04) and prolonged hospitalization >7 days (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.38–0.91, p = 0.02). Conclusions: In pediatric urological reconstructive surgery, Monocryl Plus sutures were associated with significantly fewer SSIs and shorter hospital stays compared to traditional Monocryl. Although the overall complication, reoperation, and readmission rates showed nonsignificant trends favouring Monocryl Plus, the most notable benefits appeared in hypospadias repair, suggesting that suture choice might influence outcomes in this subgroup.

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) remains the most frequent postoperative complication after pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy. Evidence is scarce regarding whether the specimen extraction port site represents a modifiable risk factor. This study evaluated the association between 10 mm trocar placement for appendix extraction and postoperative outcomes in children undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy. Methods: A retrospective single-center cohort study was conducted including children aged 0–17 years who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy between January 2012 and January 2026 with ≥30-day follow-up. Patients were grouped by placement site of the 10 mm trocar: supraumbilical versus left lower quadrant (LLQ). The primary outcome was postoperative wound infection. Secondary outcomes included overall complications, intra-abdominal abscess, postoperative ileus, stump dehiscence, operative time, length of stay, readmission, reoperation, and conversion to laparotomy. Subgroup analyses assessed the impact of endoscopic retrieval-bag use within each trocar-position group. Results: Baseline demographic, clinical, laboratory, and histopathological characteristics were comparable between the two 10 mm trocar placement sites. Overall, postoperative complications were higher with supraumbilical placement than with LLQ placement (6.9% vs. 2.9%, p < 0.001). SSI was more frequent with supraumbilical placement (3.7% vs. 0.3%, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis confirmed trocar position as an independent predictor of SSI, with LLQ placement associated with a lower risk (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.30–0.88, p = 0.015). Operative time was shorter with LLQ placement (median 32 vs. 36 min, p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between placement sites in intra-abdominal abscess, postoperative ileus, readmission, reoperation, conversion to laparotomy, or length of hospital stay. Retrieval-bag use was not associated with differences in complication rates within either trocar placement site. Conclusions: LLQ 10 mm trocar placement site was associated with substantially lower SSI rates and shorter operative time compared with supraumbilical extraction, without increasing other postoperative complications. Extraction port selection may represent a simple technical measure to improve outcomes in pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy without requiring additional resources.

Background: Osteochondroma is the most common benign bone tumor in childhood. Although most lesions are asymptomatic, surgical treatment is indicated in patients with pain, mechanical symptoms, cosmetic concerns, restricted range of motion, or neurovascular compression. This study evaluated the clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of osteochondromas in children and adolescents treated at a single tertiary pediatric surgery center. Methods: This retrospective study included 75 pediatric patients who underwent surgical excision of osteochondroma between January 2015 and January 2026. Demographic, clinical, radiological, operative, histopathological, and follow-up data were analyzed. Lesion-related variables were assessed at the level of individual exostoses. The primary outcome was surgical treatment outcome, while secondary outcomes included lesion localization, symptoms, hospital stay, postoperative complications, recurrence, and associations between clinical and morphological variables. Results: A total of 75 patients with 76 solitary osteochondromas were included. The median age was 13 years, and 64.0% of patients were male. Most lesions were located distally (73.7%), with the femur being the most common site (48.7%), followed by the tibia (22.4%). Pain was the most frequent symptom, present in 63.2% of exostoses, followed by cosmetic concern in 32.9%. Standard radiography was used in nearly all cases (98.7%). Radiographic measurements significantly underestimated lesion size compared with intraoperative measurements, with median diameters of 3.0 cm and 4.0 cm, respectively (p < 0.001). A strong positive correlation was observed between radiographic and intraoperative lesion diameter (ρ = 0.77; p < 0.001), while symptom duration showed a weak but significant correlation with lesion diameter (ρ = 0.28; p = 0.013). No significant association was found between lesion diameter and symptomatic presentation, and logistic regression did not identify age, sex, lesion location, or diameter as significant predictors of symptoms. Postoperative outcomes were favorable: 94.6% of patients had no complications, wound infection and hematoma occurred in 2.7% each, and no recurrences or reoperations were recorded during a median follow-up of 63 months. Histopathological examination confirmed osteochondroma in all cases. Conclusions: Surgical excision of symptomatic pediatric osteochondromas was associated with favorable postoperative outcomes, a low complication rate, and no observed recurrence during follow-up. Standard radiography correlates well with intraoperative findings but may underestimate true lesion size, likely due to limited visualization of the cartilaginous cap. Symptom development appears multifactorial and cannot be reliably predicted by lesion size or location alone.