COVID-19 is a newly recognized illness with a predominantly respiratory presentation. Although initial analyses have identified groups of candidate gene biomarkers for the diagnosis of COVID-19, they have yet to identify clinically applicable biomarkers, so we need disease-specific diagnostic biomarkers in biofluid and differential diagnosis in comparison with other infectious diseases. This can further increase knowledge of pathogenesis and help guide treatment. Eight transcriptomic profiles of COVID-19 infected versus control samples from peripheral blood (PB), lung tissue, nasopharyngeal swab and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) were considered. In order to find COVID-19 potential Specific Blood Differentially expressed genes (SpeBDs), we implemented a strategy based on finding shared pathways of peripheral blood and the most involved tissues in COVID-19 patients. This step was performed to filter blood DEGs with a role in the shared pathways. Furthermore, nine datasets of the three types of Influenza (H1N1, H3N2, and B) were used for the second step. Potential Differential Blood DEGs of COVID-19 versus Influenza (DifBDs) were found by extracting DEGs involved in only enriched pathways by SpeBDs and not by Influenza DEGs. Then in the third step, a machine learning method (a wrapper feature selection approach supervised by four classifiers of k-NN, Random Forest, SVM, Naïve Bayes) was utilized to narrow down the number of SpeBDs and DifBDs and find the most predictive combination of them to select COVID-19 potential Specific Blood Biomarker Signatures (SpeBBSs) and COVID-19 versus influenza Differential Blood Biomarker Signatures (DifBBSs), respectively. After that, models based on SpeBBSs and DifBBSs and the corresponding algorithms were built to assess their performance on an external dataset. Among all the extracted DEGs from the PB dataset (from common PB pathways with BALF, Lung and Swab), 108 unique SpeBD were obtained. Feature selection using Random Forest outperformed its counterparts and selected IGKC, IGLV3-16 and SRP9 among SpeBDs as SpeBBSs. Validation of the constructed model based on these genes and Random Forest on an external dataset resulted in 93.09% Accuracy. Eighty-three pathways enriched by SpeBDs and not by any of the influenza strains were identified, including 87 DifBDs. Using feature selection by Naive Bayes classifier on DifBDs, FMNL2, IGHV3-23, IGLV2-11 and RPL31 were selected as the most predictable DifBBSs. The constructed model based on these genes and Naive Bayes on an external dataset was validated with 87.2% accuracy. Our study identified several candidate blood biomarkers for a potential specific and differential diagnosis of COVID-19. The proposed biomarkers could be valuable targets for practical investigations to validate their potential.

Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is one of the most common primary glomerulonephritis and a serious health concern worldwide; though still the underlying molecular mechanisms of IgAN are yet to be known and there is no efficient treatment for this disease. The main goal of this study was to explore the IgAN underlying pathogenic pathways, plus identifying the disease correlated modules and genes using the weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) algorithm. GSE104948 dataset (the expression data from glomerular tissue of IgAN patients) was analyzed and the identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were introduced to the WGCNA algorithm for building co-expression modules. Genes were classified into six co-expression modules. Genes of the disease’s most correlated module were mainly enriched in the immune system, cell–cell communication and transmembrane cell signaling pathways. The PPI network was constructed by genes in all the modules and after hub-gene identification and validation steps, 11 genes, mostly transmembrane proteins (CD44, TLR1, TLR2, GNG11, CSF1R, TYROBP, ITGB2, PECAM1), as well as DNMT1, CYBB and PSMB9 were identified as potentially key players in the pathogenesis of IgAN. In the constructed regulatory network, hsa-miR-129-2-3p, hsa-miR-34a-5p and hsa-miR-27a-3p, as well as STAT3 were spotted as top molecules orchestrating the regulation of the hub genes. The excavated hub genes from the hearts of co-expressed modules and the PPI network were mostly transmembrane signaling molecules. These genes and their upstream regulators could deepen our understanding of IgAN and be considered as potential targets for hindering its progression.

Introduction: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is recognized as one of the leading causes of illness and death worldwide. Understanding the molecular mechanisms in ccRCC pathogenesis is crucial for discovering novel therapeutic targets and developing efficient drugs. With the application of a comprehensive in silico analysis of the ccRCC-related array sets, the main objective of this study was to discover the top molecules and pathways in the pathogenesis of this cancer. Methods: ccRCC microarray datasets were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database, and after quality checking, normalization, and analysis using the Limma algorithm, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified, considering the adjusted p value <0.049. The intensity values of the identified DEGs were introduced to the Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) algorithm to construct co-expression modules. Functional enrichment analyses were performed using the DEGs in the disease-correlated module, and hub genes were identified among the top genes in a protein-protein interaction network and the disease most correlated module. The expression analysis of hub genes was done by utilizing GEPIA, and the GSCA server was used to compare the expression patterns of hub genes in ccRCC and other cancers. DGIdb database was utilized to identify the hub gene-related drugs. Results: Three datasets, including GSE11151, GSE12606, and GSE36897, were retrieved, merged, normalized, and analyzed. Using WGCNA, the DEGs were clustered into eight different modules. Translocation of ZAP-70 to immunological synapse, endosomal/vacuolar pathway, cell surface interactions at the vascular wall, and immune-related pathways were the topmost enriched terms for the ccRCC-correlated DEGs. Twelve genes including PTPRC, ITGAM, TLR2, CD86, PLEK, TYROBP, ITGB2, RAC2, CSF1R, CCR5, CCL5, and LCP2 were introduced as hub genes. All the 12 hub genes were upregulated in ccRCC samples and showed a positive correlation with the infiltration of different immune cells. According to the DGIdb database, 127 drugs, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors, glucocorticoids, and chemotaxis targeting molecules, were identified to interact with the hub genes. Conclusion: By utilizing an integrative bioinformatics approach, this experiment shed light on the underlying pathways in the pathogenesis of ccRCC and introduced several potential therapeutic targets for repurposing or developing novel drugs for an efficient treatment of this cancer. Our next step would be to assess the gene expression profiles of the identified hubs in different cell populations in the tumor microenvironment.