Background: Tooth extraction is often accompanied by bone tissue loss. This systematic review aims to compare osteoplastic materials for socket preservation. Methods: This systematic review was carried out with the PRISMA statement. To identify relevant studies, a thorough literature search was executed in several databases, such as Medline, PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The inclusion criteria were restricted to randomized controlled trials, and their methodological quality was evaluated with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (ROB 2). Results: Based on the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, nine randomized clinical trials published before 2024 were selected for analysis, all of them investigating the application of osteoplastic materials. Six studies performed xenogenic bone augmentation; one of them compared alloplastic and xenogenic materials; two studies described synthetic osteoplastic materials; and one described autogenic bone material. Conclusion: Socket augmentation with osteoplastic materials demonstrates effectiveness in preserving alveolar ridge dimensions and creating favorable conditions for further implant placement, though differences in clinical performance highlight the need for careful material selection.

Aim. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of telmisartan, used in monotherapy or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide or amlodipine, in real clinical practice in patients with diagnosed arterial hypertension who have not reached the target levels of blood pressure (BP). Material and methods. The study was a non-intervention, prospective, multicenter, comparative, observational, epidemiological program, which was carried out in Russian medical institutions. The total patient population in which the prescribed therapy was administered included 1933 people (758 men and 1175 women, mean age 57.0-59.3 years). Participants were followed-up for 12 weeks. The change in office BP was evaluated on the 4th and 12th week. Results. Significant (p<0.001 in all cases) change in office BP compared with the initial data were recorded in all study groups of therapy already at 4 weeks of treatment and became even more pronounced at 12 weeks. In the telmisartan monotherapy group, BP decreased from 155.7±10.7/92.2±7.6 mm Hg to 131.4±12.1/80.8±7.3 mm Hg at the end of the 4th week and to 125.3±7.6/78.2±6.1 mm Hg – at the end of the 12th week. Similarly, after treatment with the combination of telmisartan and hydrochlorothiazide, BP decreased from 162.7±12.6/94.3±7.9 mm Hg to 133.2±12.5/81.6±8.4 mmHg at the end of the 4th week and to 126.0±7.8/78.4±6.7 mm Hg – at the end of the 12th week. In telmisartan/amlodipine group, a decrease in BP also occurred, from 162.5±13.2/94.6±8.6 mm Hg to 132.8±14.5/81.3±7.5 mm Hg on the 4th week and to 125.4±8.7/78.4±5.6 mm Hg at the end of follow up (12 weeks). The proportion of patients who reached the target BP (<140/90 mm Hg) after treatment with telmisartan as monotherapy was 91.7%, after treatment with telmisartan+hydrochlorothiazide – 89.6%, after treatment with telmisartan+amlodipine – 92.8%. Throughout the program, prescribed therapy was well tolerated by patients. During the study, 47 adverse events (AEs) were recorded in 36 patients: 31 AEs with telmisartan monotherapy, 5 AEs with telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination, and 11 AEs with telmisartan/amlodipine combination. Most of the AEs registered during the trial resolved by the end of the study, in four cases the date of AEs resolve is unknown, in two cases, at the time of completion of the study, AEs continued. Conclusion. In the TAINA study a high antihypertensive efficacy and a comparable favorable safety and tolerability profile of telmisartan, used as monotherapy and in combination with hydrochlorothiazide or amlodipine was determined.

The aim of the work was to study the relationship of the minimum steady-state concentration of angiotensin II receptor blockers with polymorphic markers of CYP2C9 (Arg144Cys), CYP2C9 (Ile359Leu), AGTR1 (A1166C), AGT (Met235Thr, C4072T), ACE (I/D), CYP11B2 (C-344T) genes and the office blood pressure (BP) indices.Materials and methods. The study included 179 patients of the Moscow region with newly diagnosed hypertension of stages 1–2, among whom there were 141 (78.8%) women and 38 (21.2%) men aged from 32 to 69 years (mean age — 58.2±6.4, median age — 60 (57–63 years), who had been randomized into treatment groups with valsartan and irbesartan in the form of mono- or combination therapy with hydrochlorothiazide. After 3 weeks of pharmacotherapy, polymorphic markers CYP2C9 (Arg144Cys), CYP2C9 (Ile359Leu), AGTR1 (A1166C), AGT (Met235Thr, C4072T), ACE (I/D), CYP11B2 (C-344T) were genotyped and the minimum steady-state concentrations of irbesartan and valsartan were determined. The office BP measurements were performed on each visit.Results. The carriers of alleles *2 and *3 of the CYP2C9 gene, the genotype T/T of the AGT gene, the genotype I/I of the ACE I/D polymorphism achieved higher values of the minimum steady-state concentration of irbesartan after 3 weeks of pharmacotherapy. Homozygotes A/A for the genetic polymorphism of the AGTR1 gene (A1166C), homozygotes D/D for the ACE I/D polymorphism reached significantly higher values of the minimum-steady concentration of valsartan after 3 weeks of pharmacotherapy. In the patients taking irbesartan, a more pronounced decrease in the office systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) BP was detected with an increase in the concentration for every 100 ng/mL after 3 weeks of therapy. Any association of the indicators with the valsartan concentration was found out.Conclusion. The effects of irbesartan and valsartan indicate a maximum modulation of pharmacodynamic effects during 3 weeks of pharmacotherapy, followed by a consolidation in the therapeutic range and a stop in the increasing the effectiveness with a further increase in the steady-state concentration, which can be used to predict therapy, personalize it, a better control and a high safety profile.

Background/Objectives: MEK inhibitors (selumetinib, mirdametinib) are the only approved class of targeted therapy for neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)-associated plexiform neurofibroma (PN), producing partial responses in a substantial proportion of patients (up to 63.6% in adults; objective response rate 19.7% versus 5.4% with placebo in the KOMET trial). Responses, however, are rarely complete or durable, and in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) single-agent MEK inhibition is clinically ineffective. Mechanisms of escape from MEK inhibition in these tumors remain poorly characterized and are reported in the literature as isolated primary studies without an integrative analysis. The aim of this review was to systematize both the established molecular mechanisms of resistance to MEK inhibitors in PN and MPNST and the biologically plausible candidate mechanisms extrapolated from other RAS-driven malignancies. Methods: This is a narrative review. A structured search was performed in PubMed, PubMed Central, NCBI Bookshelf, and Scopus, supplemented by clinical practice guidelines and regulatory documents; it covered publications up to 31 May 2026 and was updated in August 2026. Ninety-six sources are cited, and their composition by publication type is reported; record counts at the intermediate screening steps were not maintained, and no PRISMA flow diagram is presented. Results: Mechanisms were classified within a convergent framework into six categories: reactivation of MAPK signaling within the cascade; parallel (bypass) reactivation through receptor tyrosine kinases and adjacent inputs; epigenetic and transcriptional rewiring; cell survival programs; the tumor microenvironment and immune evasion; and intratumoural heterogeneity. Each mechanism was then graded along two independent axes—the strength of evidence that it confers resistance in PN or MPNST (E1–E3) and its therapeutic tractability (T1–T3)—and annotated with the entity and model constituting its evidence source. Conclusions: Resistance to MEK inhibition in PN and MPNST is convergent rather than mechanism-unique. The principal limitation of the field is the near-absence of clinical resistance data from patients progressing on MEK inhibitors; prospective molecular monitoring, rational combination trials, and mechanism-stratifying biomarkers are the priorities.

Introduction. Since 2020, the pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus poses a serious threat to health systems in many countries around the world. Finding inexpensive and affordable, effective and safe medications that can promote rapid recovery and reduce the risk of a severe course of COVID-19 is an important challenge for the health care system of any country. It has long been known that 7% hypertonic sodium chloride solution has nonspecific antiviral, antibacterial and antifungal properties. A 2020 study shows the effectiveness of hypertonic NaCl solutions in blocking SARS-CoV-2 replication in Vero cells. These data suggest that hypertonic solutions can be used as a prophylactic and alternative comprehensive treatment for patients with COVID-19.Aim. We study the efficacy and safety of hypertonic solution with hyaluronic acid in patients undergoing outpatient treatment with mild to moderate COVID-19.Materials and methods. We conducted an open prospective study of the use of hyaluronic acid (HA) solution 7% (Ingasalin® forte 7%) in outpatients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who had 1 or more risk factors for a severe course of the disease. Patients were divided into 2 groups of 30 patients each. The main group received, in addition to standard therapy (according to the interim guidelines in effect at the time of treatment, version 14 dated 12/27/21), inhalation of 7% HG with HA in the morning and evening for 10 days; patients in the control group received standard therapy according to the interim guidelines.Results and discussion. Patients of the study group who received hyaluronic acid solution 7% had statistically significant decrease of dyspnea and normalization of saturation values already on the 5th day of therapy compared to patients of the control group. One patient in the study group was hospitalized, and 4 patients in the control group were hospitalized. There were no side effects associated with the administration of hyaluronic acid solution 7%. Also, there was no development of cough or its intensification against the background of inhalation in patients of the main group.Conclusion. It is reasonable to use hyaluronic acid solution 7% in outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19 and with one or more risk factors of severe disease course as part of complex therapy.

Background/Objectives: Modern dentistry increasingly requires biomaterials that not only replace damaged tissues but also actively regulate healing processes, modulate inflammation, and provide controlled delivery of therapeutic agents under the complex physicochemical conditions of the oral cavity. This review aims to analyze the potential of PCHs, particularly methacryloyl gelatin (GelMA), as multifunctional platforms for drug delivery in dental applications. Methods: This review provides a structured narrative synthesis of the literature, focusing on the physicochemical, biological, and translational aspects of photocrosslinkable hydrogels in dentistry. Special attention was given to the key functional requirements for hydrogels used in dentistry, including adhesion in a wet environment, antimicrobial properties, and the ability to provide sustained and localized release of active compounds. Natural, synthetic, and semi-synthetic polymers were comparatively evaluated to justify the selection of GelMA as a leading platform due to its tunable mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and photopolymerization capacity. The review also analyzes mechanisms of drug release activation and provides a comparative assessment of commonly used photoinitiators, including Irgacure 2959, lithium phenyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate (LAP), and camphorquinone, with emphasis on their cytocompatibility with oral tissues. Results: Applications of these hydrogels in endodontics, periodontology, peri-implantitis therapy, and regeneration of bone and dental pulp are summarized. Conclusions: Overall, photocrosslinkable GelMA-based hydrogels (PC-GelMA) represent promising multifunctional platforms for localized drug delivery and regenerative strategies in modern dentistry.