Natasja Wanita Monisha Ramnath

Dr. Natasja Wanita Monisha Ramnath


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HBHannah Breuer
Hannah Breuer
MSMarjolijn Sales
Marjolijn Sales
NRNatasja Wanita Monisha Ramnath
Natasja Wanita Monisha Ramnath
Yusuf ShiebaYusuf Shieba
Yusuf Shieba
AKAlish Kolashov
Alish Kolashov
NHNima Hatam
Nima Hatam
Background: Perioperative right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is a frequent complication of cardiac surgery linked to poor outcomes and may result from the loss of pericardial support. We investigated whether pericardial closure preserves early postoperative RV function. Methods: We compared patients with pericardial closure versus open pericardium. Co-primary endpoints were early postoperative RV longitudinal function by tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and tricuspid annular systolic velocity (TASV). Adjusted comparisons used analysis-of-covariance (postoperative value adjusted for baseline) with prespecified covariates (baseline outcome, LV global longitudinal strain, left-ventricular ejection fraction, LVEDVI, sex, procedure; cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times when available). Holm correction-controlled multiplicity across the co-primary endpoints. Sensitivity linear mixed-effects models (time × group) were performed. Results: Pericardial closure was associated with better early RV longitudinal function after multivariable adjustment. TAPSE: adjusted mean difference (AMD, Closed–Open) 1.531 mm (95% CI 0.130–2.931; p = 0.033). TASV: AMD 1.694 cm/s (95% CI 0.437–2.951; p = 0.009; Holm-adjusted p = 0.018). Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent estimates. Conclusions: Pericardial closure was independently associated with improved early RV longitudinal function. These adjusted findings address baseline LV imbalances and support considering closure to preserve RV performance; confirmation in prospective trials is warranted.

29 August 2024 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NHNadine Hochhausen
Nadine Hochhausen
MSMarjolijn Sales
Marjolijn Sales
NRNatasja Wanita Monisha Ramnath
Natasja Wanita Monisha Ramnath
SBSebastian Billig
Sebastian Billig
FKFelix Kork
Felix Kork
AMAjay Moza
Ajay Moza
Background: The interaction between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is discussed controversial. Methods: In this population-based retrospective analysis including non-emergency CABG in Germany between 2015 and 2021, the aim was to compare in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay (HLOS), and perioperative ventilation time (VT) in patients affected by COPD and not affected by COPD. In addition, we compared outcomes after off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) and on-pump coronary artery bypass (ONCAB) surgery and outcomes after CABG with a minimally invasive technique with and without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in COPD patients. Results: Of the 274,792 analyzed cases undergoing non-emergency CABG, 7.7% suffered from COPD. COPD patients showed a higher in-hospital mortality (6.0% vs. 4.2%; p < 0.001), a longer HLOS (13 days (10–19) vs. 12 days (9–16); p < 0.001), and a longer VT (33 h (11–124) vs. 28 h (9–94); p < 0.001). In subgroup analyses, COPD patients undergoing OPCAB surgery showed a lower in-hospital mortality (3.5% vs. 6.4%; p < 0.001), a shorter HLOS (12 days (9–16) vs. 13 days (10–19); p < 0.001) and a shorter VT (20 h (10–69) vs. 36 h (11–135); p < 0.001) compared to ONCAB surgery. Regression analyses confirmed that using cardiopulmonary bypass in COPD patients is associated with a higher risk of in-hospital mortality (OR, 1.86; 95% CI: 1.51–2.29, p < 0.001), a longer HLOS (1.44 days; 95% CI: 0.91–1.97, p < 0.001), and a longer VT (33.67 h; 95% CI: 18.67–48.66, p < 0.001). In further subgroup analyses, COPD patients undergoing CABG with a minimally invasive technique without CPB showed a lower in-hospital mortality (3.5% vs. 16.5%; p < 0.001) and a shorter VT (20 h (10–69) vs. 65 h (29–210); p < 0.001) compared to CABG with a minimally invasive technique and CPB. Regression analyses confirmed that using CPB in COPD patients undergoing CABG with a minimally invasive technique is associated with a higher risk of in-hospital mortality (OR, 4.80; 95% CI: 2.42–9.51, p < 0.001). Conclusions: COPD negatively impacts outcomes after non-emergency CABG. According to our results, OPCAB surgery and CABG with a minimally invasive technique without CPB seem to be beneficial for COPD patients. Further studies should be performed to confirm this.