There is an increasing role of cardiovascular imaging techniques in the transcatheter delivered treatment of valvular heart disease. Minimally invasive strategies to treat valvular heart disease have emerged over the past 2 decades. The use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the treatment of severe aortic stenosis, for...
1 January 2020 in Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
The CAT-CAD trial showed that coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) in patients with a high prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) and indications for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) reduces the number of patients undergoing ICA by two-thirds and nearly eradicates non-actionable ICAs. However, the long-term benefits of this non-invasive strategy remain unknown. To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of a non-invasive strategy employing coronary CTA vs. ICA as the first-line imaging test in stable patients with a high clinical likelihood of obstruc-tive CAD. The long-term outcomes were evaluated for 36 months following randomization and included the efficacy outcome (analyzed as the composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE): all-cause death, acute coronary syndrome, unplanned coronary revascularization, urgent hospitalization for a cardiovascular reason, a stroke) and the safety outcome (analyzed as a cumulative incidence of serious adverse events). One hundred and twenty participants at a mean age of 60.6 (7.9) years (female, 35.0%) were randomized with an allocation ratio of 1:1 to coronary CTA and direct ICA as the first-line anatomical test for suspected obstructive CAD. There were no significant differences between both diagnostic strategies neither in terms of the long-term efficacy (MACE occurrence: 15.5% in coronary CTA group vs. 16.7% in ICA group; log-rank P = 0.89) nor the long-term safety (cumulative number of serious adverse events: 36 vs. 38; P = 0.79, respectively). Long-term follow-up of the randomized CAT-CAD trial confirms that the strategy employing coronary CTA is an effective and safe, non-invasive, outpatient-based alternative to ICA for patients with a high clinical likelihood of obstructive CAD.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) offers a novel treatment option for patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis, particularly for patients who are unsuitable candidates for surgical intervention. However, high therapeutical costs, socio-economic considerations, and numerous comorbidities make it necessary to target and allocate available resources efficiently. In the present study, we aimed to identify risk factors associated with futile treatment following transfemoral (TF) and transapical (TA) TAVR. Five hundred and thirty-two consecutive patients (82 ± 9 years, female 63%) who underwent TAVR between June 2009 and December 2016 at the Vienna Heart Center Hietzing were retrospectively analyzed to identify predictors of futility, defined as all-cause mortality at one year following the procedure for the overall patient cohort, as well as the TF and TA cohort. Out of 532 patients, 91 (17%) did not survive the first year after TAVR. A multivariate logistic model identified cerebrovascular disease, home oxygen dependency, wheelchair dependency, periinterventional myocardial infarction, and postinterventional renal replacement therapy as the factors independently associated with an increased one-year mortality. Our findings underscore the significance of a precise preinterventional evaluation, as well as illustrating the subtle differences in baseline characteristics in the TF and TA cohort and their impact on one-year mortality.
A 62-years-old woman was admitted to the hospital because of chronic cough, expectoration of thick mucus, hoarseness and tightness in the precordial area. Computed Tomography (CT) examination revealed the presence of a giant intrapericardial tumor with the dimensions of 80 × 38 × 32 mm. It was located anteriorly and laterally to the left atrium, posteriorly to the pulmonary trunk and the ascending aorta. This hypodense change modeled the left atrium without evidence of invasion. CT coronary angiography and 3-dimensional reconstruction were applied to enable precise planning of cardiac surgery. CT evaluation confirmed that it is possible to remove the tumor without damage to the adjacent left main coronary artery. The patient underwent cardiac surgery with sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass. A cohesive, smooth, vascularized tumor pedunculated to the left atrial epicardium was visualized. The location and dimensions corresponded to those determined by CT scan examination. The entire tumor was successfully dissected together with adjacent adipose and fibrous tissue. Histological evaluation revealed the presence of myxoid cells, blood vessels, degenerative changes, and microcalcifications embedded in profuse hyalinized stroma. Those histological features enabled identification of the intrapericardial tumor as a myxoma. Follow-up CT examination did not demonstrate any signs of recurrence of the myxoma. According to our knowledge, a myxoma located inside the pericardial sac has never been described before.