Evapotranspiration (ET) is challenging to measure directly, motivating the use of remote sensing products as alternatives. We evaluated five high-resolution (≤1 km) global ET products (SSEBop, MOD16, ETMonitor, PMLv2, and FAO’s WaPOR) against five eddy covariance (EC) measurements in Morocco’s semi-arid Tensift Al-Haouz region, with observations spanning from 2006 to 2019. These five products were selected because they offer the finest spatial resolution (around 1 km or less) among freely downloadable global ET datasets, making them well-suited for comparison with local EC flux tower data. The study area was chosen for its reliable ground-truth EC stations, extensive knowledge of local irrigation practices, and a semi-arid climate that provides a rigorous testbed for ET model evaluation in water-limited conditions. Precipitation observations were included to assess each product’s sensitivity to soil moisture and precipitation-driven ET variations, particularly to identify which models respond to rainfall and irrigation inputs (i.e., differences between rainfed and irrigated fields). Results indicate that PMLv2 achieved the best agreement with EC (R² up to 0.65, RMSE as low as 0.4 mm/day, and PBIAS under 10% at most sites), followed by WaPOR and SSEBop which captured seasonal ET patterns (R² ~0.3–0.5) with moderate bias (~20–30%). In contrast, ETMonitor and MOD16 underperformed, showing larger errors (RMSE ~1–2.5 mm/day) and substantial underestimation biases (e.g., MOD16 PBIAS ~50–80% in irrigated sites). These findings underscore the impact of algorithmic differences and highlight PMLv2, SSEBop, and WaPOR as more reliable options for estimating ET in semi-arid agricultural regions lacking in situ measurements.