Mathew J. Hardy

Mathew J. Hardy

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2015 in Biological Conservation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJ.W. Bull
J.W. Bull
MHMathew J. Hardy
Mathew J. Hardy
AMA. Moilanen
A. Moilanen
AGA. Gordon
A. Gordon

1 January 2017 in Ecology and Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMatthew J. Selinske
Matthew J. Selinske
BCBenjamin Cooke
Benjamin Cooke
Nooshin TorabiNooshin Torabi
Nooshin Torabi
MHMathew J. Hardy
Mathew J. Hardy
AKAndrew T. Knight
Andrew T. Knight
SBSarah A. Bekessy
Sarah A. Bekessy
Selinske, M. J., B. Cooke, N. Torabi, M. J. Hardy, A. T. Knight, and S. A. Bekessy. 2016. Locating financial incentives among diverse motivations for long-term private land conservation. Ecology and Society 22(2):7. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09148-220207

1 July 2016 in Environmental Science & Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AKAlexander M. Kusmanoff
Alexander M. Kusmanoff
MHMathew J. Hardy
Mathew J. Hardy
FFFiona Fidler
Fiona Fidler
GMGeorgina Maffey
Georgina Maffey
CRChristopher Raymond
Christopher Raymond
SBSarah A. Bekessy
Sarah A. Bekessy

2 March 2016 in Conservation Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MHMathew J. Hardy
Mathew J. Hardy
JFJames Fitzsimons
James Fitzsimons
SBSarah A. Bekessy
Sarah A. Bekessy
AGAscelin Gordon
Ascelin Gordon
Conservation on private land is a growing part of international efforts to stem the decline of biodiversity. In many countries, private land conservation policy often supports in perpetuity covenants and easements, which are legally binding agreements used to protect biodiversity on private land by restricting activities that may negatively impact ecological values. With a view to understand the long‐term security of these mechanisms, we examined release and breach data from all 13 major covenanting programs across Australia. We report that out of 6,818 multi‐party covenants, only 8 had been released, contrasting with approximately 130 of 673 single‐party covenants. Breach data was limited, with a minimum of 71 known cases where covenant obligations had not been met. With a focus on private land conservation policy, we use the results from this case study to argue that multi‐party covenants appear an enduring conservation mechanism, highlight the important role that effective monitoring and reporting of the permanency of these agreements plays in contributing to their long‐term effectiveness, and provide recommendations for organizations seeking to improve their monitoring programs. The collection of breach and release data is important for the continuing improvement of conservation policies and practices for private land.

1 January 2019 in Biological Conservation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMatthew J. Selinske
Matthew J. Selinske
NHNatasha Howard
Natasha Howard
JFJames Fitzsimons
James Fitzsimons
MHMathew J. Hardy
Mathew J. Hardy
KSKate Smillie
Kate Smillie
AKAndrew T. Knight
Andrew T. Knight

1 September 2015 in Land Use Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CIChristopher D. Ives
Christopher D. Ives
DBDuan Biggs
Duan Biggs
MHMathew J. Hardy
Mathew J. Hardy
Alex M. LechnerAlex M. Lechner
Alex M. Lechner
MWMateusz Wolnicki
Mateusz Wolnicki
CRChristopher M. Raymond
Christopher M. Raymond