Patients admitted to hospital with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may develop acute respiratory failure (ARF) with compromised gas exchange. These patients require oxygen and possibly ventilatory support, which can be delivered via different devices. Initially, oxygen therapy will often be administered through a conventional binasal oxygen catheter or air-entrainment mask. However, when higher rates of oxygen flow are needed, patients are often stepped up to high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP), or invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). BiPAP, CPAP, and HFNC may be beneficial alternatives to IMV for COVID-19-associated ARF. Current evidence suggests that when nasal catheter oxygen therapy is insufficient for adequate oxygenation of patients with COVID-19-associated ARF, CPAP should be provided for prolonged periods. Subsequent escalation to IMV may be implemented if necessary.

Background: Non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (BE) is a chronic lung condition characterized by irreversible bronchial dilation and presented with persistent respiratory symptoms, recurrent respiratory infections, and decreased quality of life. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are frequently prescribed in patients with bronchiectasis, despite limited evidence supporting their clinical efficacy. Inhaled corticosteroids have been associated with increased risk of respiratory infection with Haemophilus influenzae (H. influenzae) in other groups of lung diseases. We aimed to evaluate the association between ICS use and the risk of isolating H. influenzae from lower respiratory tract samples in patients with bronchiectasis. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from 2010 to 2018, encompassing all patients diagnosed with bronchiectasis in outpatient clinics in Eastern Denmark. ICS use was standardized in budesonide equivalent doses and categorized in tertiles: low (<210 μg/day), moderate (211–625 μg/day), and high (≥626 μg/day) based on cumulative budesonide equivalent doses redeemed in the 12 months before cohort entry. The primary outcome was the first isolation of H. influenzae from lower respiratory tract samples post-cohort entry. Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for relevant confounders, estimated hazard ratios (HRs), and inverse probability-of-treatment weighting (IPTW) was used in sensitivity analyses. Results: Among 3663 patients (mean age 66 years; 61% female), 2175 (59.4%) did not use ICS, while 484 (13.2%), 508 (13.9%), and 496 (13.5%) were in the low-, moderate-, and high-dose ICS groups, respectively. Furthermore, 594 (16.22%) patients had a lower respiratory tract culture positive for H. influenzae during follow-up. High-dose ICS use was associated with an increased risk of H. influenzae; HR 1.63 (95% Cl, 1.19 to 2.12, p < 0.005) compared with no ICS use. No association for low or moderate ICS use was found: low-dose ICS HR 0.75 (95% Cl, 0.52 to 1.07, p = 0.11) and moderate-dose ICS HR 1.27 (95% Cl, 0.93 to 1.72, p = 0.12). IPTW analysis confirmed the main finding. Conclusions: High-dose ICS use in patients with bronchiectasis was associated with an increased risk of acquiring H. influenzae in the lower respiratory tract. Hence, patients with bronchiectasis should be cautiously prescribed high-dose ICS.

Background/Objectives: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) increase the risk of pneumonia caused by various pathogens in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Treatment may also increase the risk of infection with non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), although evidence remains limited. The aim of this study was to assess the association between ICS treatment and the risk of NTM isolation among patients with COPD. Methods: This retrospective register-based cohort study included patients with a specialist-verified COPD diagnosis between 2008 and 2021. ICS exposure was based on redeemed prescriptions during the year preceding the index date. Exposure was calculated as the mean daily budesonide-equivalent dose and categorized as none, low, medium, or high. A cause-specific Cox proportional hazards regression model with death as a competing risk was applied, adjusted for potential confounders. Sensitivity analyses included, among others, an inverse probability of treatment weighted model, and a time-dependent Cox regression model. Results: A total of 120,006 patients were included, with a median follow-up time of 4.9 years. During follow-up, 378 (0.32%) patients reached the primary endpoint. Medium- and high-dose ICS were associated with an increased hazard of NTM isolation, with hazard ratios of 1.39 (95% CI 1.06–1.88, p = 0.020) and 1.52 (95% CI 1.14–2.04, p = 0.005), respectively. This association remained significant for high-dose ICS across all sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: In patients with COPD, ICS treatment was associated with an increased and dose-dependent hazard of NTM isolation, particularly at high doses. High-dose ICS should, therefore, be prescribed with caution.

Background: Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) treatment in COPD can increase the risk of adverse effects. It remains unclear whether eosinophil-guided ICS treatment (EGT) can reduce ICS use without increasing risk of severe exacerbations and death. Methods: The COPERNICOS (COPD-eosinophil-guided reduction of inhaled corticosteroids) trial was a 1-year nationwide, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial in patients with COPD GOLD E allocated 1:1 to receive EGT versus continued triple therapy. The EGT strategy involved a “switch on – switch off” updated every three months. Findings: We included 444 participants, with a mean age of 72 years, 51% females. There was no significant increased risk of severe exacerbations or all-cause mortality in the EGT group, incidence rate ratio 1·06 (confidence interval (CI) 0·69-1·62, p=0·77, 210 versus 176 events), although formal non-inferiority could not be demonstrated. There was a 28% reduction in daily budesonide equivalent ICS dose; 502µg (CI 35µg-692µg) versus 696µg (696-800) with continued triple therapy (p<0·001), and with no difference in systemic steroid use (0·51 mg versus 0·51 mg, p=0·50). The risk of pneumonia was similar in the two groups. Interpretation: This is the first randomised controlled trial to show that EGT reduces cumulative ICS dose without substantial increasing the risk of severe exacerbations or death, and without increasing systemic corticosteroid use. erj;68/suppl_70/PA300/F1 F1 F1