Pradeesh Sivapalan

Mr. Pradeesh Sivapalan

Herlev & Gentofte hospital
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2019 in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Pradeesh SivapalanPradeesh Sivapalan
Pradeesh Sivapalan
TLTherese S Lapperre
Therese S Lapperre
JJJulie Janner
Julie Janner
RLRasmus R Laub
Rasmus R Laub
MMMia Moberg
Mia Moberg
Jens Ulrik Stæhr JensenJens Ulrik Stæhr Jensen
Jens Ulrik Stæhr Jensen

1 February 2020 in Clinical Microbiology and Infection
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JEJosefin Eklöf
Josefin Eklöf
RSR. Sørensen
R. Sørensen
TIT.S. Ingebrigtsen
T.S. Ingebrigtsen
Pradeesh SivapalanPradeesh Sivapalan
Pradeesh Sivapalan
IAI. Achir
I. Achir
Jens Ulrik Stæhr JensenJens Ulrik Stæhr Jensen
Jens Ulrik Stæhr Jensen
The role of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the long-term prognosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine whether P. aeruginosa is associated with increased risk of exacerbations or death in patients with COPD. This is a multiregional epidemiological study based on complete data on COPD outpatients between 1 January 2010 and 31 October 2017 and corresponding microbiology and national register data. Time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models and propensity matching was used to estimate hospitalization-demanding exacerbations and death after 2 years, separately and in combination. A total of 22 053 COPD outpatients were followed for a median of 1082 days (interquartile-range: 427-1862). P. aeruginosa was present in 905 (4.1%) patients. During 730 days of follow-up, P. aeruginosa strongly and independently predicted an increased risk of hospitalization for exacerbation or all-cause death (HR 2.8, 95%CI 2.2-3.6; p <0.0001) and all-cause death (HR 2.7, 95%CI 2.3-3.4; p <0.0001) in analyses adjusted for known and suspected confounders. The signal remained unchanged in unadjusted analyses as well as propensity-matched subgroup analyses. Among patients 'ever colonized' with P. aeruginosa, the incidence of hospital-demanding exacerbations doubled after the time of the first colonization. COPD patients in whom P. aeruginosa can be cultured from the airways had a markedly increased risk of exacerbations and death. It is still not clear whether this risk can be reduced by offering patients targeted antipseudomonal antibiotics. A randomized trial is currently recruiting patients to clarify this (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03262142).

30 March 2019 in BMJ Open Respiratory Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Pradeesh SivapalanPradeesh Sivapalan
Pradeesh Sivapalan
TITruls Sylvan Ingebrigtsen
Truls Sylvan Ingebrigtsen
DRDaniel Bech Rasmussen
Daniel Bech Rasmussen
RSRikke Sørensen
Rikke Sørensen
CRChristian Madelaire Rasmussen
Christian Madelaire Rasmussen
Jens Ulrik Stæhr JensenJens Ulrik Stæhr Jensen
Jens Ulrik Stæhr Jensen
Introduction A large group of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are exposed to an overload of oral corticosteroids (OCS) due to repeated exacerbations. This is associated with potential serious adverse effects. Therefore, we evaluated the impact of a recommended reduction of OCS duration in 2014 on the risk of pneumonia hospitalisation and all-cause mortality in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD). Methods This was a nationwide observational cohort study that was based on linked administrative registry data between 1 January 2010 and 31 October 2017. 10 152 outpatients with COPD (median age 70 years) treated with either a short (≤250 mg) or long course (>250 mg) of OCS for AECOPD were included in the study. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to derive an estimation of multivariable adjusted HRs (aHRs) for pneumonia hospitalisation or all-cause mortality combined and pneumonia hospitalisation and all-cause mortality, separately. Results The long course of OCS treatment for AECOPD was associated with an increased 1-year risk of pneumonia hospitalisation or all-cause mortality (aHR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.4; p<0.0001), pneumonia hospitalisation (aHR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.3; p=0.0110) and all-cause mortality (aHR 1.8, 95% CI 1.5 to 2.2; p<0.0001) as compared with the short course of OCS treatment. These results were confirmed in several sensitivity analyses. Conclusion The change of recommendations from long courses to short courses of OCS for AECOPD in 2014 was strongly associated with a decrease in pneumonia admissions and all-cause mortality, in favour of short courses of OCS.

1 January 2015 in Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Pradeesh SivapalanPradeesh Sivapalan
Pradeesh Sivapalan
ZDZuzana Diamant
Zuzana Diamant
CUCharlotte Suppli Ulrik
Charlotte Suppli Ulrik
Obesity has significant impact on asthma incidence and manifestations. The purpose of the review is to discuss recent observations regarding the association between obesity and asthma focusing on underlying mechanisms, clinical presentation, response to therapy and effect of weight reduction. Clinical and epidemiological studies indicate that obese patients with asthma may represent a unique phenotype, which is more difficult to control, less responsive to asthma medications and by that may have higher healthcare utilization. A number of common comorbidities have been linked to both obesity and asthma, and may, therefore, contribute to the obese-asthma phenotype. Furthermore, recently published studies indicate that even a modest weight reduction can improve clinical manifestations and outcome of asthma. Compared with normal-weight patients, obese and overweight patients with asthma have poorer asthma control and respond less to corticosteroid therapy. Future studies focusing on the mechanism underlying both obesity and asthma including the obese-asthma phenotype are required to better characterize the link between the conditions and target the management of this patient group.

2 December 2021 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BBBarbara Bonnesen Bonnesen
Barbara Bonnesen Bonnesen
Jens Ulrik Stæhr JensenJens Ulrik Stæhr Jensen
Jens Ulrik Stæhr Jensen
KJKlaus Nielsen Jeschke
Klaus Nielsen Jeschke
Alexander MathioudakisAlexander Mathioudakis
Alexander Mathioudakis
Alexandru CorlateanuAlexandru Corlateanu
Alexandru Corlateanu
Pradeesh SivapalanPradeesh Sivapalan
Pradeesh Sivapalan
Patients admitted to hospital with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may develop acute respiratory failure (ARF) with compromised gas exchange. These patients require oxygen and possibly ventilatory support, which can be delivered via different devices. Initially, oxygen therapy will often be administered through a conventional binasal oxygen catheter or air-entrainment mask. However, when higher rates of oxygen flow are needed, patients are often stepped up to high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP), or invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). BiPAP, CPAP, and HFNC may be beneficial alternatives to IMV for COVID-19-associated ARF. Current evidence suggests that when nasal catheter oxygen therapy is insufficient for adequate oxygenation of patients with COVID-19-associated ARF, CPAP should be provided for prolonged periods. Subsequent escalation to IMV may be implemented if necessary.

3 August 2019 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DMDaniel Murray
Daniel Murray
TITheis Skovsgaard Itenov
Theis Skovsgaard Itenov
Pradeesh SivapalanPradeesh Sivapalan
Pradeesh Sivapalan
JEJosefin Eklöf
Josefin Eklöf
FHFreja Stæhr Holm
Freja Stæhr Holm
Jens Ulrik Stæhr JensenJens Ulrik Stæhr Jensen
Jens Ulrik Stæhr Jensen
Do we need biomarkers of lung damage and infection: For what purpose and how should they be used properly? Biomarkers of lung damage can be used for diagnosis, risk stratification/prediction, treatment surveillance and adjustment of targeted therapy. Additionally, novel “omics” methods may offer a completely different and effective way of improving the understanding of pathogenesis of lung damage and a way to develop new candidate lung damage biomarkers. In the current review, we give an overview within the field of acute lung damage of (i) disease mechanism biomarkers, (ii) of “ready to use” evidence-based biomarker-guided lung infection management, (iii) of novel strategies of inflammatory phenotyping and how this can be used to tailor corticosteroid treatment, (iv) a future perspective of where “omics” technologies and mindsets may become increasingly important in developing new strategies for treatment and for understanding the development of acute lung damage.