Background: Systematic literature review (SLR) is increasingly utilized to maximize the element of rigor and minimize the individual bias of research synthesis. An analysis of the Web of Science (WoS) database indicates that 90% of the literature review studies using SLR have been published between 2012 and 2022. However, this progressive agenda is impaired by the lack of methodological consistency and rigorousness. To fill this gap, this paper aims at mapping the theoretical comprehension and practices of SLR and providing a stepwise approach to employing such a framework. Methods: A comprehensive narrative review is used in this paper to analyze the studies concerning the literature review typology and the structural assessment of the SLR. Furthermore, the methodological approach of the literature review studies that adopted the SLR and were published in the Logistics journal is assessed across a set of vital criteria associated with conducting an SLR. Results: There is a concrete link between the purpose of a review, i.e., to describe, test, extend, or critique, and the literature review type. There are 17 distinct literature review types, e.g., a narrative review, a bibliometric analysis, etc., which must be justified meticulously regardless of the SLR. The ambiguity in conceiving the SLR either as a toolkit or a review type, the lack of justification regarding the review purpose and type, and vague conceptual distinguishment between the bibliometric analysis, as a distinct review type, and the SLR framework, are only a few of the shortcomings observed in the analyzed papers. Conclusions: Given the significant role of SLR in elevating the element of rigor within the literature review studies, it is deemed essential to employ this framework by paying attention to two holistic factors: (1) theoretical distinction between the literature review purpose, the literature review type, and the SLR; (2) strict adherence to the SLR procedure with a high degree of accuracy and explicitness.

The broad and extensive application of public-private partnership (PPP), as well as the divergent documented definitions and experiences, have led to a translucent perspective of PPP and strained academia and industry to reach a consensus on the major practice of this concept. Early contractor involvement (ECI), governance tools, and relational contracting are only a few of the frameworks attributed to PPP. This issue has received limited attention from researchers, despite the focus of review studies on different disciplines of PPP. Hence, this paper puts forward the idea of conducting a comprehensive review to not only shed light on the major practice of PPP but also provide a wider outlook on this concept based on the research carried out since 1979. A narrative review is initially accomplished to identify the major drivers and milestones that have contributed to the evolution of PPP. Employing bibliometric analysis in the following phase assists in conducting a multi-dimensional assessment of studies published within the last five decades. The economic and societal practices of PPP throughout its evolution path signified the dominant application of this concept as a business model. The bibliometric analysis revealed that PPP has contributed to various sectors, i.e., urban development, public infrastructure, transportation, health, and education, just to name a few. In addition, economic and organizational management of PPP was revealed as a major research stream that was accompanied by sustainable development. As a matter of fact, economic and environmental sustainability are the major cross-disciplinary elements that form an interplay between the drivers and attributes of PPP. Value for money (VfM), technology, and innovation, along with smart infrastructure (SI) and smart cities (SCs), are identified as the major directions for the future research agenda associated with PPP.

Amid increasing global focus on sustainable development, the integration of sustainability into the construction sectors of developing countries remains underexplored, with Ethiopia’s rapid urban growth offering a vital case for study. This research assesses the level of sustainability practices incorporated into recently constructed medium- and large-scale commercial buildings in urban Ethiopia, utilizing a locally adapted, indicator-based assessment framework. Based on international standards, national sustainability goals, and expert insights, an initial set of 36 indicators was refined by 41 experts through Likert-scale surveys and the Relative Importance Index (RII), resulting in a core set of 24 prioritized indicators covering environmental, social, and economic dimensions. The framework was applied to 23 purposefully selected commercial buildings, categorized by gross floor area into medium (5000–20,000 m²) and large (>20,000 m²) groups, according to local definitions. Results reveal very low adoption of sustainability practices across both groups, with over 70% of buildings scoring below 15%, highlighting a significant gap in sustainable construction. This study presents a context-specific, empirically based evaluation tool aligned with Ethiopia’s expanding sustainable building initiatives. It establishes key benchmarks for policymaking, supports targeted efforts, and enhances the broader understanding of sustainability practices in developing countries.

The construction sector, particularly the production of materials like cement and steel, is a major contributor to global CO₂ emissions, with cement alone responsible for about 8%. Conventional masonry relies heavily on cement, increasing embodied carbon and costs, but standardized data on low-carbon alternatives such as compressed stabilized earth blocks (CSEBs) remain scarce, limiting their adoption in sustainable housing. To support the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) and the Paris Agreement goals for net-zero embodied carbon in building materials by 2050, this study aims to assess the production and performance of CSEBs as a low carbon alternative to conventional masonry. It specifically addresses the research gap on technical performance and carbon savings, providing new empirical evidence for Ethiopian soils. Soil samples from Kara (east of Addis Ababa) were analyzed for grading, plasticity, and chemical composition. Blocks were produced with Portland pozzolana cement (4–12%) under compaction pressures of 4–10 MPa and tested for compressive strength and water absorption over 56 days. Results show that 6% cement content achieved >2 MPa compressive strength, meeting the structural requirements, while higher cement content and pressure improved strength and reduced absorption. Compared to hollow concrete blocks, CSEBs cut cement use by over 50%, avoiding up to 2 tons of CO₂ per 100 m² of wall. These findings confirm CSEBs as a technically viable and climate-conscious solution for affordable housing and support their integration into sustainable construction practices.

The construction industry is central to the socio-economic and infrastructural advancement of developing countries; however, it continues to face persistent performance challenges, most notably recurrent cost overruns. While systematic cost risk management is recognized as a critical approach to improving project outcomes, its adoption across the industry remains limited. This study seeks to identify and rank the critical obstacles that hinder contractors from integrating systematic cost risk management into building construction projects. A comprehensive methodology was employed, including an in-depth literature review and three rounds of Delphi. The Relative Importance Index (RII) was used to evaluate the severity of the identified barriers, and Holm-corrected Spearman’s rank correlation analysis was applied to examine the relationships among them. The findings reveal that the most influential barriers include the absence of structured risk management frameworks within organizations, insufficient top management support, the lack of collaborative risk management mechanisms among stakeholders, limited technical knowledge and skills in risk management, and inadequate client support. The strong positive correlations among these barriers highlight their interdependent nature and underscore the systemic challenges facing contractors. This study contributes to the broader field of civil and structural engineering by providing evidence-based insights that can support the development of targeted strategies to enhance cost risk management practices in developing-country construction environments.

Public administration research provides structured explanations of collaborative governance. PPP scholarship, however, has largely emphasized macro governance frameworks, leaving micro-level collaborative drivers between internal partners underexplored. Additionally, internal transparency has seldom received attention as a governance outcome of collaboration. Building upon collaborative governance theories, this study conceptualizes collaboration in PPPs through four focal collaborative elements (FCEs): organizational capacity asymmetries, commitment to process, effective communication, and trust building. A survey instrument was used to collect experts’ opinions regarding the impact of PPP-specific characteristics, as practical mechanisms, on collaboration. The results show strong endorsement of mechanisms related to post-procurement capacity asymmetries, role/authority shifts, contractual complexity, and lifecycle discontinuities (staff changes and phase transitions). Such PPP characteristics undermine communication and information continuity. Trust building appeared to have an ambivalent role shaped by long-term incentives alongside goal drift and contractual rigidity. This study identifies the most salient mechanisms framing collaborative elements in PPP and translates them into governance implications for sustained collaboration and strengthened internal transparency across PPPs’ lifecycle. Limitations and future avenues for research based upon these findings are presented.