Jennifer Anne Whitaker

Dr. Jennifer Anne Whitaker

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 January 2021 in Vaccine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JWJennifer Anne Whitaker
Jennifer Anne Whitaker
SPSameer A. Parikh
Sameer A. Parikh
TSTait D. Shanafelt
Tait D. Shanafelt
NKNeil E. Kay
Neil E. Kay
RKRichard B. Kennedy
Richard B. Kennedy
GPGregory A. Poland
Gregory A. Poland

18 July 2023 in Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JWJennifer Anne Whitaker
Jennifer Anne Whitaker
HSHana M. El Sahly
Hana M. El Sahly
CHC. Mary Healy
C. Mary Healy
Purpose of review: The successes of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccines have accelerated the development of mRNA vaccines against other respiratory pathogens. The aim of this review is to highlight COVID-19 mRNA vaccine advances and provide an update on the progress of mRNA vaccine development against other respiratory pathogens. Recent findings: The COVID-19 mRNA vaccines demonstrated effectiveness in preventing severe COVID-19 and death. H7N9 and H10N8 avian influenza mRNA vaccines have demonstrated safety and immunogenicity in phase 1 clinical trials. Numerous seasonal influenza mRNA vaccines are in phase 1–3 clinical trials. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) mRNA vaccines have progressed to phase 2–3 clinical trials in adults and a phase 1 clinical trial in children. A combined human metapneumovirus and parainfluenza-3 mRNA vaccines was found to be well tolerated and immunogenic in a phase 1 trial among adults and trials are being conducted among children. Clinical trials of mRNA vaccines combining antigens from multiple respiratory viruses are underway. Summary: The development of mRNA vaccines against respiratory viruses has progressed rapidly in recent years. Promising vaccine candidates are moving through the clinical development pathway to test their efficacy in preventing disease against respiratory viral pathogens.

2 September 2015 in Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JDJacob B. Davidson
Jacob B. Davidson
JVJithinraj Edakkanambeth Varayil
Jithinraj Edakkanambeth Varayil
AOAkiko Okano
Akiko Okano
JWJennifer Anne Whitaker
Jennifer Anne Whitaker
SBSara L. Bonnes
Sara L. Bonnes
RHRyan Thomas Hurt
Ryan Thomas Hurt

26 September 2024 in Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LGLauren Grant
Lauren Grant
JWJennifer Anne Whitaker
Jennifer Anne Whitaker
SYSarang K Yoon
Sarang K Yoon
KLKaren Lutrick
Karen Lutrick
SBShivam Bhargava
Shivam Bhargava
FRFornessa T Randal
Fornessa T Randal
Immunogenicity studies suggest that recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV) may provide better protection against influenza than standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccines (SD IIV). This randomized trial evaluated the relative vaccine effectiveness (VE) and immunogenicity of RIV versus SD IIV in frontline workers and students aged 18–64 years. Participants were randomized to receive RIV or SD IIV and followed for reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)–confirmed influenza during the 2022–2023 influenza season. Sera were collected from a subset of participants before and at 1 and 6 months postvaccination and tested by hemagglutination inhibition for A/H1N1, A/H3N2, B/Yamagata, and B/Victoria and against cell-grown vaccine reference viruses for A/H1N1 and A/H3N2. Overall, 3988 participants were enrolled and vaccinated (25% of the trial sample size goal); RT-PCR–confirmed influenza occurred in 20 of 1963 RIV recipients and 28 of 1964 SD IIV recipients. Relative VE was 29% (95% confidence interval [CI], −26% to 60%). In the immunogenicity substudy (n = 118), the geometric mean titer ratio (GMTR) comparing RIV to SD IIV at 1 month was 2.3 (95% CI, 1.4–3.7) for cell-grown A/H1N1, 2.1 (95% CI, 1.3–3.4) for cell-grown A/H3N2, 1.1 (95% CI, .7–1.6) for B/Victoria, and 1.4 (95% CI, .9–2.0) for B/Yamagata. At 6 months, GMTRs were >1 against A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B/Yamagata. Relative VE of RIV compared to SD IIV did not reach statistical significance, but RIV elicited more robust humoral immune responses to 2 of 4 vaccine viruses at 1 month and 3 of 4 viruses at 6 months after vaccination, suggesting possible improved and sustained immune protection from RIV. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT05514002.

1 July 2020 in Mayo Clinic Proceedings
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JWJennifer Anne Whitaker
Jennifer Anne Whitaker

29 November 2022 in Annals of Internal Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GPGail E. Potter
Gail E. Potter
TBTyler Bonnett
Tyler Bonnett
KRKevin Rubenstein
Kevin Rubenstein
DLDavid A. Lindholm
David A. Lindholm
RRRekha R. Rapaka
Rekha R. Rapaka
PTPablo Tebas
Pablo Tebas
The standard of care (SOC) for COVID-19 evolved rapidly during 2020 and 2021, but its cumulative effect over time is unclear. In this post hoc analysis of a series of phase 3 trials that evaluated ... Visual Temporal Improvements in COVID-19 Outcomes for Hospitalized Adults. The standard of care (SOC) for COVID-19 evolved rapidly during 2020 and 2021, but its cumulative effect over time... Background: The COVID-19 standard of care (SOC) evolved rapidly during 2020 and 2021, but its cumulative effect over time is unclear. Objective: To evaluate whether recovery and mortality improved ...