Aims: The aim of this review was to synthesize the best available evidence on the impact of nurses' safety attitudes on patient outcomes in acute‐care hospitals.Design: Systematic review with a narrative synthesis of the available data.Data sources: Data sources included MEDLINE, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection. Studies published up to March 2021 were included.Review Methods: This review was conducted using guidance from the Joanna Briggs Institute for Systematic Reviews and reported as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐Analyses guidelines.Results: A total of 3,452 studies were identified, and nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Nurses with positive safety attitudes reported fewer patient falls, medication errors, pressure injuries, healthcare‐associated infections, mortality, physical restraints, vascular access device reactions and higher patient satisfaction. Effective teamwork led to a reduction in adverse patient outcomes. Most included studies (N = 6) used variants of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture to assess nurses' safety attitudes. Patient outcomes data were collected from four sources: coded medical records data, incident management systems, nurse perceptions of adverse events and patient perceptions of safety.Conclusion: A positive safety culture in nursing units and across hospitals resulted in fewer reported adverse patient outcomes. Nurse managers can improve nurses' safety attitudes by promoting a non‐punitive response to error reporting and promoting effective teamwork and good communication.

Knowledge and awareness of diabetes mellitus and its risk factors in Saudi Arabia

Aims: To examine the association between nursing unit safety culture, quality of care, missed care and nurse staffing levels, and inpatient falls using two data sources: incidence of falls and nurses' perceptions of fall frequency in their units. The study explores the association between the two sources of patient falls and identifies if nurses' perceptions of patient fall frequency reflect the actual patient falls recorded in the incident management system.Background: Inpatient falls are associated with severe complications that result in extended hospitalisation and increased financial consequences for patients and healthcare services.Design: A multi‐source cross‐sectional study guided by the STROBE guidelines.Methods: A purposive sample of 33 nursing units (619 nurses) from five hospitals completed an online survey from August to November 2021. The survey measured safety culture, quality of care, missed care, nurse staffing levels and nurses' perceptions of patient fall frequency. In addition, secondary data on falls from participating units between 2018 and 2021 were also collected. Generalised linear models were fitted to examine the association between study variables.Results: Nursing units with strong safety climate and working conditions and lower missed care were associated with lower rates of falls using both data sources. Nurses' perceptions of the frequency of falls in their units were reflective of the actual incidence rate of falls, but the association was not statistically significant.Conclusion: Nursing units with a strong safety climate and better collaborations between nurses and other professionals, including physicians and pharmacists, were associated with lower incidents of patient falls.Relevance to Clinical Practice: This study provided evidence for healthcare services and hospital managers to minimise patient falls.Patient or Public Contribution: Patients who had experienced a fall, which was reported in the incident management system, from the included units in the five hospitals were part of this study.

Safety culture is known to influence patient outcomes, but the relationship between nursing units’ safety cultures and the development of pressure injuries in acute care hospitals is unclear. Pressure injuries are a nursing-sensitive patient outcome and are widely considered preventable. To examine the impact of unit safety culture, nursing unit characteristics, and missed care on pressure injury rates in Saudi Arabian hospitals. A multi-center cross-sectional study was conducted between August and November 2021 and compared to secondary data on the incidence of pressure injuries. A total of 653 nurses from 35 units in five Ministry of Health hospitals in Saudi Arabia participated in this study. The survey included validated scales of safety culture, nurse staffing, and nurses’ perceptions of quality of care, missed care, and the frequency of pressure injury. Secondary data on pressure injuries were collected from the Ministry of Health administrative database between 2018 and 2021. Descriptive analysis and Generalized Linear Models were performed. Higher safety culture scores were associated with fewer pressure injuries (β = -2.000, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] -3.107, -0.893) and lower nurses’ perceptions of the frequency of pressure injuries in their unit (β = -1.224, 95% CI -2.255, -0.192). High scores on the sub-scales of hospital management (β = -2.105, 95% CI -2.835, -1.375) and safety climate (β = -1.402, 95% CI -2.383, -0.421) were the most statistically significant predictor for pressure injury prevention. Higher frequency of missed nursing care was positively associated with higher rates of pressure injuries (β = 1.606, 95% CI 0.187, 3.024) and higher nurses’ perceptions of the frequency of pressure injuries (β = 1.243, 95% CI 0.211, 2.363). There was a positive relationship between higher nurses’ perceptions of the frequency of pressure injury and higher incidence rate of pressure injury as reported in the incident management system (β = 1.183, 95% CI 0.065, 2.301). Nursing units with stronger safety climate and safety behavior scores, higher ratings of hospital and unit quality of care, and lower levels of missed nursing care were associated with lower incidence of pressure injury and nurses’ perceptions of the frequency of pressure injury in their units. Nurses’ perceptions of the frequency of pressure injuries are concordant with the incidence of pressure injuries and can be a valid measure to capture patient outcomes within a specific time. High safety culture and lower missed care are linked to fewer pressure injuries in Saudi Arabian hospitals. Nurses’ perceptions of pressure injury frequency aligned with reported incidence rates, indicating a valid measure of patient outcomes.

Background: Healthcare environments expose workers and patients to hazardous substances, leading to sickness and death. Nurses play a critical role in maintaining patient health and managing occupational risks, including biological, physical, chemical, and psychological hazards, highlighting the need for significant commitment. This study aims to explore the occupational health hazards and control measures among nurses and nurse managers in Saudi Arabia. Methods: A descriptive, cross‐sectional study was conducted using a convenience sample of 222 nurses and nurse managers in Northern Border Hospitals. A Google survey questionnaire was utilized for capturing data, including demographic information, occupational health hazards, and control measures. Results: Of the 222 nurses surveyed, 20.3% experienced high ergonomic hazards, 14.4% experienced physical hazards, 14.9% experienced chemical hazards, 17.1% experienced biological hazards, and 34.2% experienced moderate psychological hazards. Regarding safety measures, 86.0% of participants reported high levels of control, 80.6% took proactive safety precautions, and 87.8% adhered to comprehensive control measures. There was little correlation between demographic characteristics, occupational hazards, and control measures. A significant negative association was found between control measures and occupational hazards ( p value ≤ 0.001). Conclusion: Nurses face a range of occupational hazards, including ergonomic, physical, chemical, biological, and psychological risks. Addressing these hazards is essential for the well‐being of nurses, the quality of patient care, and the creation of a healthier work environment. While control measures are generally effective, some healthcare workers lack access to adequate safety protocols. The results indicated a negative correlation between exposure to occupational health hazards and the implementation of control measures.