Knowledge and awareness of diabetes mellitus and its risk factors in Saudi Arabia

Background: Nurses have a crucial role in managing, educating, and caring for diabetic patients. However, their knowledge should be regularly assessed to avoid preventable complications and reduce costs. Therefore, the present study assessed the perceived and actual knowledge about diabetes among nurses in Hail province of Saudi Arabia and investigated predictors of such knowledge. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 325 conveniently sampled nurses from all public hospitals and primary healthcare centres in Hail province from September to December 2022. A pre-designed questionnaire was used to collect demographic and practice-related characteristics of the nurses. In addition, data on nurses’ perceived and actual knowledge about diabetes were collected using the Diabetes Self-Report Tool (DSRT) and Diabetes Basic Knowledge Tool (DBKT) self-report questionnaires, respectively. The mean knowledge scores for demographic and practice-related variables were compared using the independent-samples t-test and one-way analysis of variance. Multiple linear regression was used to identify significant predictors of perceived and actual knowledge. The correlation between perceived and actual knowledge was investigated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. A P-value ˂0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Based on a highest maximum score of 60 using the DSRT, the mean score of perceived knowledge was 38.4 ± 12.0, corresponding to a percentage mean score of 64%. On the other hand, based on a highest maximum score of 49 using the DBKT, the mean score of actual knowledge was 23.2 ± 9.6, corresponding to a percentage mean score of 47.3% of correct responses. Being Indian, having a diploma or a bachelor’s degree, and having a poor or fair self-perception of competence in diabetes care were predictors of lower perceived knowledge scores, whereas having no access to diabetes guidelines was a predictor of higher scores. However, being non-Saudi and having experience of at least 16 years were predictors of higher actual knowledge scores. The correlation between actual and perceived knowledge about diabetes was negligible and statistically non-significant (r = 0.011, P = 0.055). Conclusion: Nurses affiliated with public health facilities in Hail province lack adequate knowledge about diabetes, with no correlation between what is perceived to be known and what is actually known. Indian citizenship, having a diploma or bachelor’s degree, not having access to diabetes guidelines, not attending courses/workshops, and having a poor or fair self-perception of competence in diabetes care can significantly predict nurses’ perceived knowledge. However, being non-Saudi (Filipino or Indian) and having at least 16 years of experience can significantly predict their actual knowledge of diabetes.

Nursing turnover has emerged as an urgent concern with a substantial influence on the financial efficiency and quality of care in healthcare frameworks worldwide. This study determined important factors associated with nurses’ intentions to leave and what would bring them back. This was a cross-sectional, multisite study of nurses in three public hospitals. Convenience sampling was used to recruit 205 nurses from the selected hospitals. A questionnaire was used to measure demographic and professional background information, current job satisfaction, and the intention to leave work and return. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were run using SPSS. This study revealed that both job satisfaction (M = 47.26, SD = 11.59, range: 19–76) and intent to leave a current job (M = 14.18, SD = 4.36, range: 4–20) were reported at moderate levels. There were significant differences reported between the scores of nationality and job satisfaction (p < 0.05) and between the means of income level and intention to leave (p < 0.05). There was also a significant, negative association between satisfaction and intention to leave (r = −0.551, p < 0.05). In regression, income level (β = 0.159, p = 0.021), incentives (β = 0.186, p = 0.002), hospital type (β = 0.189, p = 0.005), and intention to leave (β = −0.454, p < 0.001) significantly influenced satisfaction. Gender (β = −0.122, p = 0.037) and nationality (β = −0.210, p = 0.007) were found to influence the intention to leave among participants significantly. In conclusion, this study indicated that job satisfaction and intention to leave are important factors affecting nurses’ enthusiasm. Incentives also had a positive impact on increasing nurses’ satisfaction levels. Future research studies should investigate what factors might lead to improved monthly salaries and provide more incentives among nurses.

Background: Reflection increases meta-cognitive capacities, promotes student-instructor relationships, overcomes the theory-practice gap, and enriches learning. This study aims at exploring nursing students’ perspectives on the facilitators of reflective practices in the clinical setting. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted among 21 Saudi nursing students at one major university in Saudi Arabia. Results: Two major themes were prevalent upon thematic analysis, namely, “Personal Drivers of Reflection” which consisted of “Motivation to Learn”, “Desire to develop”, “Ethical Regard”, and “Responsibility towards patients” and “External Drivers of Reflection” which consisted of “Patient characteristics”, “Case complexity”, and “Competent Instructors”. Conclusion: As per the results of the study, nursing students perceived that they underwent reflection as a response to personal motivational and external educational aspects. According to the findings, instructors should assist students through clinical reflection, with a special focus on their interactions and motivation.