This study investigates the hydrography and geochemical signature in Ilha Grande Bay (RJ, Brazil), focusing on the seasonal intrusion of South Atlantic Central Water (SACW) and its interaction with lead sources. CTD (Conductivity, Temperature, and Depth) data revealed the presence of SACW during the summer campaigns (Mangaratiba/2011 and Frade/2012), characterized by temperatures below 20 °C and salinity between 34.6 and 36. The intrusion is driven by northeasterly winds that favor coastal upwelling, establishing a classic thermohaline stratification. The winter campaigns did not detect SACW, confirming its seasonal nature. Isotopic analysis of Pb in sediments identified six Pb²⁰⁶/Pb²⁰⁷ intervals, indicating multiple sources, including natural contributions, industrial waste, and urban effluents. The Pb²⁰⁶/Pb²⁰⁷ ranges were defined based on cluster analysis and frequency histograms, which are common methods in isotopic provenance studies. An overlap between the most radiogenic isotopic signatures and the presence of SACW suggests that this water mass acts as a vector for transporting trace elements from the deep oceanic region to the coast. This study provides the first evidence that the South Atlantic Central Water (SACW) acts as a seasonal vector, importing a distinct radiogenic Pb isotopic signature onto the continental shelf of Ilha Grande Bay. By synoptically coupling physical water-mass analysis (CTD) with Pb isotopic tracers, we introduce a novel approach that successfully discriminates oceanic from anthropogenic Pb sources, offering a new framework for understanding contaminant transport in coastal areas influenced by boundary currents. It is concluded that the coastal dynamics in Ilha Grande Bay are governed by the seasonal interaction of coastal, continental, and oceanic waters, and that the integration of physical and geochemical data is crucial for understanding mixing processes and contaminant transport in this complex environment.

The Caribbean Coastal Marine Productivity (CARICOMP) program was conceptualized in 1985 to monitor coral reefs, seagrass beds, and mangrove forests at multiple sites across the wider Caribbean. Mangrove monitoring was focused on the dominant Caribbean species, red mangrove (Rhizophora mangle). Forest structure and productivity were monitored at 21 sites (18 countries) across different geomorphological settings, from tropical to subtropical mainland and island systems. Here, we provide the key findings from the CARICOMP mangrove data collected, mostly from 1992 to 2013, to assess spatial and temporal variability across the region. Red mangrove above-ground biomass averaged 190 t ha⁻¹ (far higher than previously reported) but ranged widely across sites from 33 to 590 t ha⁻¹, equating to an average above-ground ‘blue carbon’ of 84 t ha⁻¹ (range 15–260 t ha⁻¹). Tree density averaged 3237 trees ha⁻¹, tree basal area averaged 19.7 m² ha⁻¹, tree height averaged 6.1 ± 2.8 m, and seedling density varied from 1.2 to 74 seedlings m⁻² across the sites. Among the environmental factors that influence mangroves, local temperature and rainfall explained 48% of the variability in measured tree structure parameters. Annual litterfall, as a proxy for productivity, measured on average 1.24 ± 0.70 kg m⁻² yr⁻¹, with 60% of the total litterfall composed of leaves. Litterfall varied seasonally by 42%. No relationship was apparent between litterfall and seasonal ocean–atmosphere climate indices (ONI and AMM). With exception of the three most southwesterly CARICOMP sites, hurricanes and tropical storms impacted the mangrove sites repeatedly, resulting in considerable damage. A direct strike by a category-4 hurricane in 1998 in Dominican Republic killed 67% of the red mangrove trees, lowered above-ground biomass by 91%, basal area by 89%, litterfall by 63%, and resulted in the subsequent growth of many tall and thin saplings, totally changing the structure of the forest ecosystem in the first few years after the hurricane. In comparing mangrove systems, major differences may be explained by time elapsed since the last destructive event (hurricane) affecting each site. This highlights the fact that despite an increasing focus on preserving these valuable ecosystems, they are still highly vulnerable to natural hazards and likely to face a poor outcome under ongoing climate change.