Le Liu

Dr. Le Liu

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 April 2023 in IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LLLe Liu
Le Liu
ALAleksandra Lekić
Aleksandra Lekić
MPMarjan Popov
Marjan Popov
The DC transmission line protection technology is crucial for the development of multi-terminal Voltage Source Converter (VSC)-based HVDC systems. This article proposes a robust non-unit traveling wave protection (TWP), which deals with the DC fault area identification and fault type discrimination for high impedance fault conditions. The authors applied the traveling wave (TW) reflection and refraction method for the line-mode network. The distinctive features of high-frequency components contained in the line-mode and pole-mode voltage TWs at different relay units are used for the algorithm modeling. Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) is selected as the time-frequency analysis tool. The performed simulations are conducted for a four-terminal VSC-HVDC system, and validate the protection feasibility and robustness. More precisely, the proposed protection scheme identifies the internal and external DC faults within 2 ms, and provides correct operation during high-impedance faults (HIF) with a 25 dB level noise interference. This protection scheme makes use of a VSC-assisted resonant current (VARC) direct current circuit breaker (DCCB), that successfully interrupts the fault currents in less than 10 ms after the fault inception. The authors also comprehensively compared the proposed scheme with the existing methods. The obtained results show that the proposed protection scheme is superior in terms of sensitivity and selectivity performance.

20 January 2023 in International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LLLe Liu
Le Liu
ASAjay Shetgaonkar
Ajay Shetgaonkar
ALAleksandra Lekić
Aleksandra Lekić

12 December 2024 in International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LLLe Liu
Le Liu
FXFan Xie
Fan Xie
XKXiaoning Kang
Xiaoning Kang
ZHZhiguo Hao
Zhiguo Hao
ALAleksandra Lekić
Aleksandra Lekić
MPMarjan Popov
Marjan Popov

1 June 2025 in Smart Power & Energy Security
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LLLe Liu
Le Liu
XCXuming Chen
Xuming Chen
XKXiaoning Kang
Xiaoning Kang
XMXiaowei Ma
Xiaowei Ma
JLJiapeng Li
Jiapeng Li
XLXin Liu
Xin Liu

22 November 2024 in International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FXFan Xie
Fan Xie
LLLe Liu
Le Liu
ZHZhiguo Hao
Zhiguo Hao
TWTing Wang
Ting Wang
SYSonghao Yang
Songhao Yang
MPMarjan Popov
Marjan Popov

17 October 2023 in Entropy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FWFenghua Wang
Fenghua Wang
HCHale Cetinay
Hale Cetinay
ZHZhidong He
Zhidong He
LLLe Liu
Le Liu
PMPiet Van Mieghem
Piet Van Mieghem
RKRobert E. Kooij
Robert E. Kooij
For this study, we investigated efficient strategies for the recovery of individual links in power grids governed by the direct current (DC) power flow model, under random link failures. Our primary objective was to explore the efficacy of recovering failed links based solely on topological network metrics. In total, we considered 13 recovery strategies, which encompassed 2 strategies based on link centrality values (link betweenness and link flow betweenness), 8 strategies based on the products of node centrality values at link endpoints (degree, eigenvector, weighted eigenvector, closeness, electrical closeness, weighted electrical closeness, zeta vector, and weighted zeta vector), and 2 heuristic strategies (greedy recovery and two-step greedy recovery), in addition to the random recovery strategy. To evaluate the performance of these proposed strategies, we conducted simulations on three distinct power systems: the IEEE 30, IEEE 39, and IEEE 118 systems. Our findings revealed several key insights: Firstly, there were notable variations in the performance of the recovery strategies based on topological network metrics across different power systems. Secondly, all such strategies exhibited inferior performance when compared to the heuristic recovery strategies. Thirdly, the two-step greedy recovery strategy consistently outperformed the others, with the greedy recovery strategy ranking second. Based on our results, we conclude that relying solely on a single metric for the development of a recovery strategy is insufficient when restoring power grids following link failures. By comparison, recovery strategies employing greedy algorithms prove to be more effective choices.