Pavel Konopik

Dr. Pavel Konopik

COMTES FHT a.s.
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2018 in Materials Characterization
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jan DzuganJan Dzugan
Jan Dzugan
MSM. Seifi
M. Seifi
RPRadek PROCHAZKA
Radek PROCHAZKA
MRMartin Rund
Martin Rund
PPPavel Podaný
Pavel Podaný
JLJ.J. Lewandowski
J.J. Lewandowski

1 January 2015 in Procedia Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MRMartin Rund
Martin Rund
RPRadek PROCHAZKA
Radek PROCHAZKA
Pavel KonopikPavel Konopik
Pavel Konopik
Jan DzuganJan Dzugan
Jan Dzugan
HFHugo Folgar
Hugo Folgar
The paper deals with the determination of dynamic mechanical properties of steel sheets by the miniature testing technique. Several materials were investigated, namely S235, S355 and 1.4301. The newly developed micro-tensile test (M-TT) allows local mechanical properties measurement which can be successfully used for example for weld heterogeneity determination. Furthermore, due to small size samples (tensile sample gauge section dimension of 0,5x1,5x3mm), much higher strain rates can be attained using relatively slow loading velocities in comparison to standard dynamic tests resulting in high results consistency thanks to significant reduction of the oscillations which are typical for common high strain rate tests. The results obtained from M-TT and standard tensile tests were compared

1 March 2018 in Nuclear Engineering and Design
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jan DzuganJan Dzugan
Jan Dzugan
MŠMiroslav Španiel
Miroslav Španiel
APAntonín Prantl
Antonín Prantl
Pavel KonopikPavel Konopik
Pavel Konopik
JRJan Růžička
Jan Růžička
JKJiří Kuželka
Jiří Kuželka


1 February 2017 in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
PDF file
Jan DzuganJan Dzugan
Jan Dzugan
MSM Sibr
M Sibr
Pavel KonopikPavel Konopik
Pavel Konopik
RPRadek PROCHAZKA
Radek PROCHAZKA
MRMartin Rund
Martin Rund

14 March 2021 in Metals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KRKateřina Rubešová
Kateřina Rubešová
MRMartin Rund
Martin Rund
SRSylwia Rzepa
Sylwia Rzepa
HJHana Jirková
Hana Jirková
ŠJŠtěpán Jeníček
Štěpán Jeníček
Pavel KonopikPavel Konopik
Pavel Konopik
Sheet metal forming boundaries are established using the forming limit diagram (FLD). The Nakajima and Marciniak tests, which are based on stretching a material using a punch, are the most commonly used methods for determining the FLD or fracture forming limit diagram (FFLD). The results are usually evaluated by calculating local strain, strain rates, specimen thickness reduction or fracture strain. When the amount of experimental material is insufficient, miniaturization of the testing specimens may be a solution. However, the interchangeability of the results for standard and miniaturized specimens has not been proven yet. In this study, the Nakajima tests were performed using standard and sub-sized specimens made of manganese–boron steel 22MnB5, commonly used in the automotive industry. Afterwards, four FLD/FFLD evaluation methods were applied and compared. The miniaturized specimens yielded higher strain values, which was explained by the varied ratio of material thickness/punch diameter and different bending conditions. The highest compliance of the results was recorded for the standard and miniaturized FFLD.