Joanna Sułkowska Joanna Sułkowska

Dr. Joanna Sułkowska Joanna Sułkowska


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
IMIwona Malinowska-Lipień
Iwona Malinowska-Lipień
TWTadeusz Wadas
Tadeusz Wadas
JSJoanna Sułkowska Joanna Sułkowska
Joanna Sułkowska Joanna Sułkowska
MSMagdalena Suder
Magdalena Suder
TGTeresa Gabryś
Teresa Gabryś
TBTomasz Brzostek
Tomasz Brzostek
Introduction. Working in the state of a pandemic is a huge mental load for the medical environment. Aim. Evaluation of emotional control among nurses against work conditions and the support received during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Material and methods. The research was performed among nurses (n = 577) working during the pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus in infectious (n = 201) and non-infectious (n = 376) wards in 11 Polish hospitals. To evaluate work conditions, the questionnaire prepared by the authors and the Emotional Control Scale (Courtauld Emotional Control Scale—CECS), which rates the control of anger, depression, and fear were used. Results. In the entire research group, fear had the highest rate of suppression among the negative emotions—18.25 points, 17.91 points in infectious wards and 18.44 points among nurses working in non-infectious wards; p > 0.05. The nurses fear was significantly repressed when there was no possibility of the nurses having to perform a COVID-19 test in the workplace; p < 0.05. A larger emotional supressed occurred in nurses who simultaneously declared the perception of increased stress level; p < 0.05. Conclusions. A high level of emotion suppression, especially regarding fear, combined with higher stress levels, occurring irrespective of the ward, points at the need for mental support for the researched nurses.

27 February 2025 in Microorganisms
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IBIzabella Bylica
Izabella Bylica
EJEstera Jachowicz
Estera Jachowicz
JBJustyna Brodowicz
Justyna Brodowicz
JSJoanna Sułkowska Joanna Sułkowska
Joanna Sułkowska Joanna Sułkowska
MBMonika Bociąga-Jasik
Monika Bociąga-Jasik
Jadwiga Wójkowska-MachJadwiga Wójkowska-Mach
Jadwiga Wójkowska-Mach
The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, profoundly impacted global health systems and economies. Vaccination and diagnostic advancements were pivotal in managing the pandemic. This systematic review evaluates antibody levels in adults following complete COVID-19 vaccination and examines the prevalence of infections in vaccinated populations. A systematic review adhering to PRISMA guidelines was conducted, focusing on studies analyzing antibody levels at least 14 days after full vaccination with FDA- or EMA-approved vaccines. Five European studies meeting the inclusion criteria were selected. Data were extracted and synthesized from studies involving 6280 participants aged 19 to 105, with an average of 11% having prior exposure to SARS-CoV-2. Antibody levels were analyzed over time, and the incidence of post-vaccination COVID-19 cases was recorded. The reviewed studies demonstrated that antibody levels peaked shortly after vaccination but gradually declined over time. Individuals with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection exhibited higher antibody titers than those without prior exposure. After the first dose, the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccine led to significantly higher antibody levels than the Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccine, especially in those without prior infection. Across all studies, the incidence of COVID-19 among vaccinated individuals was low (0.1–3.8% for 144–302 days post-vaccination). Vaccination reduced severe outcomes despite decreasing antibody levels. The decline in new COVID-19 cases and related deaths is attributed to widespread vaccination, natural immunity, and virus mutations reducing severity. Further studies are warranted to explore antibody persistence and optimal vaccination strategies.

30 November 2025 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RJRafał Roman Jaeschke
Rafał Roman Jaeschke
JSJoanna Sułkowska Joanna Sułkowska
Joanna Sułkowska Joanna Sułkowska
This conceptual narrative review explores the intricate dynamics of the ‘stimulant paradox’ in adult ADHD, highlighting the timing-dependent trade-offs associated with stimulant medication. The paradox underscores the complexity of balancing therapeutic benefits against potential side effects, contingent on the timing of administration. Chronopharmacotherapy emerges as a promising framework, integrating circadian and homeostatic processes with pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations. This approach suggests that aligning medication timing with individual biological rhythms may optimize outcomes, although the conceptual nature of this integration remains non-prescriptive. ADHD coaching is examined as a complementary strategy, focusing on the development of skill-oriented routines that are sensitive to timing. This adjunctive support may facilitate the practical implementation of chronopharmacotherapy principles, enhancing adherence and effectiveness. Figures and heuristics within the review serve as illustrative tools intended to guide understanding rather than dictate clinical practice. The review identifies critical areas for future research, emphasizing the need for empirical investigation into optimal clock-time windows, phase measures, and chronotype stratification. Additionally, assumptions regarding medication formulations warrant further scrutiny to refine timing-sensitive interventions in adult ADHD management.

1 March 2020 in Pielegniarstwo XXI wieku / Nursing in the 21st Century
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ADAlicja Diak
Alicja Diak
JSJoanna Sułkowska Joanna Sułkowska
Joanna Sułkowska Joanna Sułkowska
Ilona Elżbieta KuźmiczIlona Elżbieta Kuźmicz
Ilona Elżbieta Kuźmicz
IMIwona Malinowska-Lipień
Iwona Malinowska-Lipień
AGAgnieszka Gniadek
Agnieszka Gniadek
TBTomasz Brzostek
Tomasz Brzostek
Introduction. Shortage of nurses reported in the EU (European Union) among other causes is related to: non-attractive work conditions, lack of willingness to take up job as a nurse (despite their education), and high risk of professional burnout. Encouraging graduates to take up a job in the profession and remain is a challenge for employers and institutions involved in the problems of modern nursing. Teaching nurses how to: protect themselves from professional burnout, how to combine career ambitions, family needs and above all personal satisfaction is of utmost importance. Amongst possible solutions which enhance planning of career and personal development in a deliberate manner, as is the case in other professions, it may be worth considering the support of a coach. Aim. Analysis of the professional situation of nurses in the context of need for individual development using the coaching method. Method. A method of analysis and criticism of the literature was used. Conclusions and results. Coaching gives an opportunity for conscious planning process of nurse professional development in synchrony with needs and expectations for personal, family and social life. Better stress management, maintaining work-life balance and professional burnout prevention are benefits provided by this approach.

1 December 2019 in Pielegniarstwo XXI wieku / Nursing in the 21st Century
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EKEwa Kawalec-Kajstura
Ewa Kawalec-Kajstura
MCMagdalena Chomicka
Magdalena Chomicka
JSJoanna Sułkowska Joanna Sułkowska
Joanna Sułkowska Joanna Sułkowska
GPGrazyna Puto
Grazyna Puto
Ilona Elżbieta KuźmiczIlona Elżbieta Kuźmicz
Ilona Elżbieta Kuźmicz
Introduction. Allergic diseases belong to the most important health problems responsible for the incidence of various types of discomfort. The application of specific allergen therapy (SAI) is becoming a more and more frequent method aimed at treating allergic diseases. However, this approach requires a strict adherence to medical treatment, which may affect patients’ quality of life. Aim. Assessment of quality of life and everyday functioning in the group of patients who underwent a specific allergen therapy. Material and methods. The study group consisted of 80 adult patients who decided to undergo SAI treatment and were treated in two health care facilities in Małopolska region. The study included an assessment of life quality and selected aspects of functioning (as well as their retrospective assessment). As far as the applied methods are concerned, the study was based on the authors’ own questionnaire and an abbreviated version of the World Organization Quality of Life-BREF questionnaire. Results. SAI treatment made it possible to reduce both the incidence (Me=4.00 to 2.00; p<0.001) and intensity (Me=4.00 to 2.00; p<0.001) of allergic symptoms. Also the discomfort caused by the allergy was decreased (Me=4.00 to 2.00; p<0.001). Moreover, some improvement in general well-being (Me=4.00 to 5.00; p<0.001) and life satisfaction (Me=4.00 to 5.00; p<0.001) was observed. Conclusions. Specific allergen immunotherapy seems to be worth considering as it improves patients’ life satisfaction and reduces discomfort caused by the allergy itself.