Purpose: Current pediatric ophthalmology practice relies on adult reference values for optical coherence tomography (OCT) and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) interpretation due to limited age-appropriate normative data, potentially leading to diagnostic misclassification. Methods: We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional study comparing OCT and OCT-A parameters between 37 healthy Caucasian children (1–17 years) and 28 adults (19–65 years) using identical Zeiss CIRRUS protocols. Parameters included peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), macular thickness, ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL), optic nerve head (ONH) perfusion, and macular vascular density. Results: Children exhibited significantly thinner parafoveal macular thickness compared to adults (251.67 ± 21.32 vs. 270.36 ± 17.02 μm; p < 0.001) while RNFL thickness remained comparable. OCT-A demonstrated higher ONH perfusion in children across multiple sectors (p < 0.001). Within the pediatric cohort, younger children (1–9 years) showed higher macular vessel and perfusion density than older children (10–17 years). All pediatric scans achieved excellent image quality with no exclusions. Conclusions: Clinically significant age-related differences in retinal structure and vasculature necessitate pediatric-specific reference ranges. The demonstrated technical feasibility supports routine OCT/OCT-A implementation in pediatric practice with age-appropriate interpretation guidelines.

Background/Objectives: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography (OCT-A) provide detailed measurements of retinal structure and vasculature; however, age-related differences in how these parameters correlate with one another remain poorly understood. We hypothesized that vascular–structural integration in the macula is more pronounced in adults than in children. Our aim was to characterize correlation patterns in pediatric and adult populations to inform the development of age-specific clinical interpretation guidelines. Methods: This prospective cross-sectional observational study enrolled 37 healthy children (age 1–17 years) and 28 healthy adults (age 18–65 years). Eyes with ocular or systemic conditions affecting the retina or prior intraocular surgery were excluded. Standardized OCT and OCT-A acquisition protocols provided structural and vascular measures. Univariable correlation analyses applied a stringent threshold (p < 0.001) to identify robust associations. Significant univariable results were entered into multivariable regression models adjusting for age, gender, intraocular pressure, and axial length. A Group-wise Linkage Proportion quantified the percentage of potential significant correlations among eight predefined anatomical parameter groups. Results: Ninety univariable correlations met p < 0.001. Fourteen correlations were shared across age groups, notably foveal avascular zone metrics and vessel density, showing very large negative correlations (r = −0.70 to −0.87). The pediatric cohort displayed 40 unique correlations, primarily linking optic nerve head flow indices to retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Adults exhibited 36 unique correlations, dominated by macular vascular–thickness coupling concentrated in the parafoveal region. After multivariable adjustment, 52 of 90 associations remained significant. Adult-specific associations lost significance more frequently (58%) than pediatric-specific associations (43%), whereas correlations shared across both groups showed complete stability (100%). The Group-wise Linkage Proportion indicated pronounced macular vascular–structural coupling in adults (48.4%) versus near absence in children (1.2%). Conclusions: Retinal parameter correlation patterns show fundamental differences between pediatric and adult eyes. While optic nerve head-macular thickness relationships remain consistent across ages, adults exhibit mature, localized integration of macular vascular and structural parameters absent in children. These findings suggest that pediatric and adult OCT/OCT-A measurements may benefit from separate reference standards, although prospective validation is required before clinical implementation.