Surgery, even on an elective-basis, often induces significant stress in patients, characterized by preoperative anxiety and heightened stress levels due to anticipation of the unknown. However, the primary objective of preoperative counseling is to mitigate these concerns, particularly when delivered in a structured and comprehensive manner. While previous research has highlighted the beneficial impact of preoperative counseling on patient-reported outcomes, none have specifically explored the implementation of a structured checklist-based approach during counseling sessions. To bridge this gap in the literature, our study aims to investigate the effects of implementing a checklist-based structured counseling approach on patient-reported outcomes following elective surgery. In this prospective cohort study conducted over one year from January to December 2023, a total of 600 patients undergoing elective surgery across three specialties—orthopedic surgery, general surgery, and urology—were examined. The patients were divided into two groups: an intervention group consisting of 300 patients and a control group with an equal number of patients. The study evaluated three key outcomes—postoperative pain, anxiety, and satisfaction—at three specific time points following surgery: 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h. Patients receiving structured checklist counseling showed significantly lower pain scores (24 h: 6.6 vs. 7.03, p = 0.041; 48 h: 5.62 vs. 6.55, p = 0.029; 72 h: 2.54 vs. 2.90, p = 0.035) and anxiety scores (24 h: 8.58 vs. 9.25, p = 0.039; 48 h: 7.50 vs. 8.45, p = 0.030; 72 h: 4.53 vs. 5.98, p = 0.031), as well as higher satisfaction scores (24 h: 5.99 vs. 5.06, p = 0.043; 48 h: 6.99 vs. 6.02, p = 0.033; 72 h: 9.10 vs. 8.20, p = 0.039) compared to controls. These improvements were consistently significant across all three surgical specialties studied (p < 0.05). The structured checklist-based counseling method proves to be effective and essential. This method is associated with reduced postoperative pain and anxiety levels, along with increased patient satisfaction, when compared to the standard approach. Prospective non-randomized study, Level II.

Background: Elderly hip fractures represent a global health care burden. Several reports expected a massive increase in the incidence of hip fractures by the next few decades. Knowing the epidemiology of hip fractures is crucial for planning health care policies. The purpose of this study is to provide a nationwide epidemiological overview of hip ‎fractures in Jordan and to report the perioperative outcomes that may help to improve the delivered healthcare. ‎. Methods: We conducted ‎ a retrospective study at 2 university hospitals and 2 major ‎governmental hospitals in Jordan.‎ We reviewed the records for all patients (age > 55 years) who were diagnosed with hip fractures ‎over a 3 years duration (2019– 2021). ‎We documented the patient’s characteristics and the perioperative data (including preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative details including the 1-year mortality).‎ Results: The total number of included patients was 1268; more than half (53.7%) were females.‎ The mean age is ‎ 75 years (SD 9.7). ‎ The most common fracture type was trochanteric (66.2%)‎. ‎ 7% of patients had a prior contralateral hip fracture‎. The average time from admission to surgery was 2.96 days (SD 2.63). The surgery was done within 48 ‎hours for ‎ 56.7%‎ of patients.‎ Approximately, one-third of all patients (34.5%) received a blood transfusion.‎ The average length of hospital stay is 7.44 days (SD 5). The overall rate of postoperative thromboembolic events, readmission within 1 month, and revision ‎for the same surgery are 2.4%‎, 10.7%‎, and 3% respectively.‎ The 1-month, 6-month, and 12-month mortality rates are 4.5%, 9.1%, and 12.8% respectively. Conclusion: The annual incidence of elderly hip fractures in Jordan is approximately 96 per 100,000 individuals. The 1-year mortality rate of hip fractures in Jordan ‎is ‎ 12.8%‎.‎ Both findings are ‎in the lower range of nearby Arab countries.

Musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions, such as back pain and joint disorders, are common globally and significantly burden healthcare systems. Family medicine clinics serve as the first point of care, requiring providers to manage diverse MSK issues and address gender-specific differences, especially in regions with limited resources, like the Middle East. This study evaluates MSK management, gender differences, and patient perceptions in Jordanian family medicine clinics, aiming to improve care strategies and outcomes in similar settings. This cross-sectional study included 500 adults with musculoskeletal complaints at a Jordanian teaching hospital (January–June 2024). Data were collected via interviews and records, focusing on patient perceptions and health profiles. Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained. Analysis was conducted in SPSS with p < 0.05 as the significance threshold. In our study of 500 patients (mean age 46.1 years, 61.5% female), key gender differences emerged. Females had a higher prevalence of low back pain (61.9% vs. 38.1%, p = 0.024) and hip pain (100%, p = 0.008), as well as greater anxiety about disease progression (62.2% vs. 37.8%, p = 0.045) and fear of disability (64.2% vs. 35.8%, p = 0.048). Females also reported lower mental health (p = 0.036), sleep quality (p = 0.044), and overall quality of life (p = 0.019). In contrast, males showed higher workload (54.4% vs. 45.6%, p = 0.020), more work-related injuries (82.8%, p < 0.001), and greater disability (p = 0.024) with lower functional status (p = 0.041). These findings underscore significant gender-specific needs in MSK care. Our study reveals notable gender-based differences in musculoskeletal complaints and treatment experiences in a Jordanian tertiary setting. Females reported higher rates of low back and hip pain, more frequent referrals, and lower quality of life, while males experienced greater occupational strain, work-related injuries, and disability.

Introduction Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) is a painful orthopedic hand condition caused by compression of the median nerve at the wrist. Diagnosis is typically clinical, relying on patient’s symptoms and physical examination findings, but confirmation often requires electrodiagnostic studies. Previous research on CTS has explored the relationship between median nerve compression severity and various outcomes. However, these studies have been limited by short follow-up durations, small to modest patient cohorts, and a narrow focus on patient-reported outcomes. The objective of this study was to provide a long-term, 10-year follow-up with a relatively large patient cohort, focusing on new patient-reported outcomes and their association with the severity of nerve compression. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted on a total of 581 patients who underwent open carpal tunnel release surgery between 2013 and 2023 at a major teaching hospital in Jordan. Severity was categorized based on nerve conduction study results into three groups: mild, moderate, and severe and Six distinct outcomes of interest were examined. Results No significant differences in age, health profiles, comorbidities, or disease presentation were observed among the severity groups. However, significant variations were found across the six outcomes. Patients with severe disease had longer recovery times (p < 0.01), less pain relief (p = 0.03), reduced satisfaction (p = 0.04), diminished functional improvement (p < 0.01), lower ADL improvement (p < 0.01), yet experienced better sleep quality improvement (p < 0.01). Conclusion Long-term follow-up post-open carpal tunnel release surgery revealed that severe cases experienced longer recovery times, less pain relief, reduced satisfaction, diminished functionality improvement, and lower ADL improvement, but better sleep quality. Level of evidence Level III, Retrospective cohort study.

Hip fractures are common orthopedic injuries that have significant impacts on patients and healthcare systems. Previous studies have shown varying outcomes for hip fracture management in different settings, with diverse postoperative outcomes and complications. While teaching hospital settings have been investigated, no studies have specifically examined hip fracture outcomes in teaching hospitals in Jordan or the broader Middle East region. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate this important outcome. A cohort comprising 1268 patients who underwent hip fracture fixation from 2017 to 2020 was analyzed for nine distinct outcomes. These outcomes encompassed time to surgery, ICU admissions, perioperative hemoglobin levels, length of hospital stay, readmission rates, revision procedures, and mortality rates at three time points: in-hospital, at 6-months, and at 1-year post-surgery. The analysis of 1268 patients (616 in teaching hospitals, 652 in non-teaching hospitals) showed shorter mean time to surgery in teaching hospitals (2.2 days vs. 3.6 days, p < 0.01), higher ICU admissions (17% vs. 2.6%, p < 0.01), and more postoperative blood transfusions (40.3% vs. 12.1%, p < 0.01). In-hospital mortality rates were similar between groups (2.4% vs. 2.1%, p = 0.72), as were rates at 6-months (3.1% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.65) and 1-year post-surgery (3.7% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.96). Geriatric hip fracture patients in teaching hospitals have shorter surgery times, more ICU admissions, and higher postoperative blood transfusion rates. However, there are no significant differences in readmission rates, hospital stays, or mortality rates at various intervals.