Steam ejectors are important energy-saving equipment for solar thermal energy storage; however, a numerical simulation research method has not been agreed upon. This study contributes to a comprehensive selection of turbulence models, near-wall treatments, geometrical modeling (2-D and 3-D), solvers, and models (condensation and ideal-gas) in the RANS equations approach for steam ejectors through validation with experiments globally and locally. The turbulence models studied are k-ε Standard, k-ε RNG, k-ε Realizable, k-ω Standard, k-ω SST, Transition SST, and linear Reynolds Stress. The near-wall treatments assessed are Standard Wall Functions, Non-equilibrium Wall Functions, and Enhanced Wall Treatment. The solvers compared are pressure-based and density-based solvers. The root causes of their distinctions in terms of simulation results, applicable conditions, convergence, and computational cost are explained and compared. The complex phenomena involving shock waves, choking, and vapor condensation captured by different models are discussed. The internal connections of their performance and flow phenomena are analyzed from the mechanism perspective. The originality of this study is that both condensation and 3-D asymmetric effects on the simulation results are considered. The results indicate that the k-ω SST non-equilibrium condensation model coupling the low-Re boundary conditions has the most accurate prediction results, best convergence, and fit for the widest range of working conditions. A 3-D asymmetric condensation model with a density-based solver is recommended for simulating steam ejectors accurately.

Rail transit as a high-energy consumption field urgently requires the adoption of clean energy innovations to reduce energy consumption and accelerate the transition to new energy applications. As an energy-saving fluid machinery, the ejector exhibits significant application potential and academic value within this field. This paper reviewed the recent advances, technical challenges, research hotspots, and future development directions of ejector applications in rail transit, aiming to address gaps in existing reviews. (1) In waste heat recovery, exhaust heat is utilized for propulsion in vehicle ejector refrigeration air conditioning systems, resulting in energy consumption being reduced by 12~17%. (2) In vehicle pneumatic pressure reduction systems, the throttle valve is replaced with an ejector, leading to an output power increase of more than 13% and providing support for zero-emission new energy vehicle applications. (3) In hydrogen supply systems, hydrogen recirculation efficiency exceeding 68.5% is achieved in fuel cells using multi-nozzle ejector technology. (4) Ejector-based active flow control enables precise ± 20 N dynamic pantograph lift adjustment at 300 km/h. However, current research still faces challenges including the tendency toward subcritical mode in fixed geometry ejectors under variable operating conditions, scarcity of application data for global warming potential refrigerants, insufficient stability of hydrogen recycling under wide power output ranges, and thermodynamic irreversibility causing turbulence loss. To address these issues, future efforts should focus on developing dynamic intelligent control technology based on machine learning, designing adjustable nozzles and other structural innovations, optimizing multi-system efficiency through hybrid architectures, and investigating global warming potential refrigerants. These strategies will facilitate the evolution of ejector technology toward greater intelligence and efficiency, thereby supporting the green transformation and energy conservation objectives of rail transit.

As an energy-saving fluid machinery component, the ejector holds significant potential for promoting energy conservation and sustainable transformation in aerospace. This review synthesizes recent progress, identifies persistent challenges, and outlines future directions for ejector technology in this field, addressing a gap in existing reviews. (1) In aero-engine systems, performance faces constraints from high-speed compression effects and flow losses. These systems require optimized design across a wide range of speeds. A mixed configuration incorporating a blade mixer achieved a 5~7% thrust increase under static conditions. (2) In high-altitude test facilities, transient start-up and flow instability under off-design conditions demand more precise models and control strategies. An alternative solution using a second throat exhaust diffuser reduced the start-up time by 50~70%. (3) In rocket-based combined cycle engines, development is limited by thermal choking, mode transition, and combustion-flow coupling issues. Optimization of the rocket layout and geometric throat increased the bypass ratio in ejector mode by 35% and improved the specific impulse by 12.5%. Future efforts should focus on constructing multi-physics coupling numerical simulation models for ejectors, analyzing unsteady flow behavior and thermal effects within ejectors, and developing performance optimization strategies based on intelligent control. These approaches are expected to enhance the engineering applicability and system efficiency of ejector technology in the aerospace field, which is increasingly focused on energy conservation and sustainable transformation.