Lívia Rodrigues de Menezes

Prof. Dr. Lívia Rodrigues de Menezes

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2017 in Dental Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AFAndrea Soares Q.S. Fonseca
Andrea Soares Q.S. Fonseca
AMAllana Dutra Labruna Moreira
Allana Dutra Labruna Moreira
PAPedro Paulo A.C. de Albuquerque
Pedro Paulo A.C. de Albuquerque
LMLívia Rodrigues de Menezes
Lívia Rodrigues de Menezes
CPCarmem S Pfeifer
Carmem S Pfeifer
LSLuis Felipe J. Schneider
Luis Felipe J. Schneider

1 July 2017 in Polymer Testing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MTMarina Rodrigues Tavares
Marina Rodrigues Tavares
LMLívia Rodrigues de Menezes
Lívia Rodrigues de Menezes
JFJosé Carlos Dutra Filho
José Carlos Dutra Filho
LCLúcio Mendes Cabral
Lúcio Mendes Cabral
MTMaria Inês Bruno Tavares
Maria Inês Bruno Tavares

12 February 2016 in Materials Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LMLívia Rodrigues de Menezes
Lívia Rodrigues de Menezes
ESEmerson Oliveira da Silva
Emerson Oliveira da Silva
The aim of this study was to obtaining an adhesive made of dimethacrylate copolymer and clay particles in different concentrations. The samples were prepared by light curing and were evaluated by XRD, FTIR and TGA as well as by measuring flexural strength, elasticity modulus and tensile resistance. The XRD and the mechanical test results indicated that the system with 0.2% clay is exfoliated, while the highest concentrations showed the agglomeration of these clays. FTIR was used to determine the conversion, and showed that use of clays particles are unable to significantly alter the polymerization until 1.0%. However, for the group containing 1.5%, there was a decline in this index. In the thermogravimetric analysis, only the groups with 0.2% of clays showed increased thermal resistance. In conclusion, the incorporation of clay at 0.2% concentration produces a well-dispersed system and can be applied as a dental adhesive.

30 May 2013 in Polymer Engineering & Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EPE.D. Pereira
E.D. Pereira
Fernando Gomes Souza JrFernando Gomes Souza Jr
Fernando Gomes Souza Jr
CSC.I. Santana
C.I. Santana
DSD.Q. Soares
D.Q. Soares
ASAndreza Salvio Lemos Salvio
Andreza Salvio Lemos Salvio
LMLívia Rodrigues de Menezes
Lívia Rodrigues de Menezes

16 February 2016 in Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DODayane Oliveira
Dayane Oliveira
LMLívia Rodrigues de Menezes
Lívia Rodrigues de Menezes
AGAlexandre Gatti
Alexandre Gatti
LSLourenço Correr Sobrinho
Lourenço Correr Sobrinho
JFJack Ferracane
Jack Ferracane
MSMário Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti
Mário Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti

1 January 2021 in Journal of Applied Oral Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LLLucas Lara
Lucas Lara
MRMateus Garcia Rocha
Mateus Garcia Rocha
LMLívia Rodrigues de Menezes
Lívia Rodrigues de Menezes
ACAmérico Bortolazzo Correr
Américo Bortolazzo Correr
MSMario Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti
Mario Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti
DODayane Oliveira
Dayane Oliveira
To evaluate the effect of combining Norrish type I and II photoinitiators on the cure efficiency of dental resin-based composites. Experimental composites were produced containing different photoinitiator systems: Norrish type I-only, mono-alkyl phosphine oxide (TPO); Norrish type II-only, camphorquinone (CQ); or its combination, CQ and TPO, in a 1: 1 molar ratio. UV-vis absorption spectrophotometry was performed to assess the consumption of each photoinitiator after curing (n=3). A multi-wave LED (Bluephase® G2, Ivoclar Vivadent) was pre-characterized and used with a radiant exposure of 24 J/cm2. The degree of conversion was evaluated by Raman spectrometry, and the elution of the monomers by nuclear magnetic resonance analysis (n=3). Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05; β=0.2). The combination of CQ and TPO increased the consumption of the photoinitiator system compared to CQ-only (p=0.001), but presented similar consumption compared to TPO-only (p=0.52). There was no significant difference in the degree of conversion between the composites regardless of the photoinitiator system (p=0.81). However, the elution of the monomers was reduced when both photoinitiators were combined. TPO-based material presented the highest elution of monomers. The combination of the photoinitiator systems seems to be beneficial for the cure efficiency of dental resin-based composites.