Objectives: To find out if the expressed breast milk delivery rate to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) for babies who were hospitalized for any reason other than COVID-19, and exclusive breastfeeding (EB) rates between discharge date and 30th day of life of those babies were affected by COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Babies who were hospitalized before the date first coronavirus case was detected in our country were included as control group (CG). The study group was divided into two groups; study group 1 (SG1): the mothers whose babies were hospitalized in the period when mother were asked not to bring breast milk to NICU, study group 2 (SG2): the mothers whose babies were hospitalized after the date we started to use the informed consent form for feeding options. The breast milk delivery rates to NICU during hospitalization and EB rates between discharge and 30th day of life were compared between groups. Results: Among 154 mother-baby dyads (CG, n=50; SG1, n=46; SG2, n=58), the percentage of breast milk delivery to NICU was 100%, 79% for CG, SG2, respectively (p<0.001). The EB rate between discharge and 30th day of life did not change between groups (CG:90%, SG1:89%, SG2:75.9; p=0.075). Conclusions: If the mothers are informed about the importance of breast milk, the EB rates are not affected by the COVID-19 pandemic in short term, even if the mothers are obligatorily separated from their babies. The breast milk intake rate of the babies was lowest while our NICU protocol was uncertain, and after we prepared a protocol this rate increased.

Acute liver failure is a condition that is defined as a sudden, complete, or nearly complete loss of liver functions without any previous liver disease, usually accompanied by encephalopathy, which can be reversible, but with a mortality rate of 55-70%. Acute liver failure newborns is an acute liver failure in the first 28 days of life. The Pediatric Acute Liver Failure Working Group identified the presence of coagulopathy as the main finding for the identification of acute liver failure in childhood following vitamin K administration. Although the incidence of acute liver failure is reported to be 17/100 000 in all ages, its incidence is not known exactly in newborn and childhood. The most common cause of acute liver failure in the newborn period is the gestational alloimmune liver disease that was previously known as neonatal hemochromatosis. This is followed by viral infections, metabolic diseases, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, and other rare causes. In the neonatal period, acute liver failure is a rare condition with a high mortality rate. For this reason, the vital signs of the patients should be closely monitored and supportive treatments should be planned according to the follow-up and the etiology of the disease should be clarified urgently. In this process, acyclovir treatment until herpes simplex virus infection is excluded and lactose-free feeding until galactosemia is excluded are recommended as life-saving treatments. In the literature, since there is a limited number of studies related to neonatal acute liver failure, prospective studies investigating the factors affecting treatment and prognosis are needed. Cite this article as: Karadağ N, Okbay Güneş A, Karatekin G. Acute liver failure in newborns. Turk Arch Pediatr 2021; 56(2): 108-14.

Objectives and Aim: The primary aim of this study was to conduct a comparative analysis of the safety and efficacy of levetiracetam (LEV) and phenobarbital (PB) as first-line treatments for neonatal seizure management. This study was designed to measure and compare the incidence of adverse effects and to determine the discharge and mortality rates associated with the use of these antiseizure medications (ASMs). Through this comparison, this research sought to provide insights to optimise care for neonates experiencing seizures. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated 104 neonates treated for seizures at Zeynep Kamil Hospital from 2015 to 2020 after excluding those on non-PB/LEV antiseizure medications. Seizures were characterised using electroencephalogram (EEG) and categorised according to aetiology and frequency. Treatment efficacy was gauged by seizure cessation, as confirmed using EEG. Adverse effects and demographic data were recorded. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS, employing the Shapiro–Wilk, independent t-test, Mann–Whitney U test, and chi-square test, with a significance threshold of p < 0.05. Results: Overall, 104 neonates treated with first-line ASM were evaluated for efficacy; PB was administered in 68.26% of the cases, while LEV was utilised in 31.74%. The total complete response rate was 40.38%, with no significant difference between the PB and LEV groups (p = 0.309). The incidence rate ratios (IRRs) demonstrated that seizure frequency profoundly influenced treatment effectiveness, with IRRs of 2.09 for rare seizures, 3.25 for frequent seizures, and 4.01 for status epilepticus, indicating a higher treatment response rate with increasing seizure frequency. For second-line treatment, among a subset of 62 patients, PB had a slight, non-significant advantage over LEV, with an odds ratio of 1.09, suggesting a marginally better response to LEV. Adverse events were significantly more frequent in the PB group, affecting 19 of 67 neonates (28.36%), compared to only 2 of 71 neonates (2.82%) in the LEV group (p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in the discharge rates between the two groups (PB, 67.61%; LEV, 75.76%; p = 0.674). Interestingly, the mortality rate was significantly higher in the LEV group (45.45%) than that in the PB group (22.54%; p = 0.045). Conclusion: This study underscores LEV’s superior safety profile over PB in neonatal seizure management, evidenced by a significantly lower rate of adverse events. PB seems to be more effective in the second-line treatment of neonatal seizures. Despite the lack of significant differences in the discharge rates, the higher mortality rate associated with LEV warrants further investigation. These findings advocate the cautious selection of antiepileptic drugs in neonatal care, with a preference for LEV based on its safety profile.

Background: Neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome (NARDS) is an important cause of hypoxemic respiratory failure. This study aimed to investigate the short-term effects of endotracheal surfactant and budesonide combination therapy on NARDS secondary to late-onset neonatal sepsis (LONS). Methods: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional, and observational study. Newborns with NARDS due to LONS who received endotracheal surfactant and budesonide combination therapy between August 2022 and September 2023 were included in this study. Oxygenation status before endotracheal surfactant and budesonide treatment were compared with the values obtained two hours after treatment. Results: Among 20 neonates, 10 (50%) were diagnosed with severe NARDS, and 10 (50%) were diagnosed with moderate NARDS. The mean corrected gestational age was 33.3±2.9 w when endotracheal surfactant and budesonide were administered to the neonates. The need for the fraction of inspired oxygen (0.75 [0.57-1.00]% vs. 0.55 [0.44-0.80]%; mean difference [MD]: 17.50%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.99 to 22.50) and oxygen saturation index (OSI; 8.03 [4.98-13.94] vs. 4.71 [4.11-8.93]; MD: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.22 to 3.24) decreased (P=0.001 and P<0.001, respectively) after endotracheal surfactant and budesonide treatment. However, preductal oxygen saturation (SpO2 ; 93 [91-94]% vs. 95 [94-96]%; MD: -3.50%, 95% CI: -5.00 to -2.00) increased significantly after endotracheal surfactant and budesonide treatment when compared to pre-treatment values (P<0.001). Conclusion: The reduction in oxygen demand and OSI, along with an increase in SpO2 after treatment compared to pre-treatment values, suggests that endotracheal surfactant and budesonide combination therapy could be an effective option to improve oxygenation in NARDS secondary to LONS.