Maria Helena Guimarães

Dr. Maria Helena Guimarães

ICAAM - Instituto de Ciências Agrárias e Ambientais Mediterrânicas, Universidade de Évora, Pólo da Mitra, Ap. 94, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2019 in Futures
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Maria Helena GuimarãesMaria Helena Guimarães
Maria Helena Guimarães
CPChristian Pohl
Christian Pohl
OBOlivia Bina
Olivia Bina
MVMarta Varanda
Marta Varanda

1 March 2016 in Cities
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DADaniel Alves
Daniel Alves
ABAna Barreira
Ana Barreira
Maria Helena GuimarãesMaria Helena Guimarães
Maria Helena Guimarães
Thomas PanagopoulosThomas Panagopoulos
Thomas Panagopoulos

25 July 2018 in Sustainability Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HWHenrik Von Wehrden
Henrik Von Wehrden
Maria Helena GuimarãesMaria Helena Guimarães
Maria Helena Guimarães
OBOlivia Bina
Olivia Bina
MVMarta Varanda
Marta Varanda
DLDaniel J. Lang
Daniel J. Lang
RLRoderick John Lawrence
Roderick John Lawrence

1 January 2012 in Journal for Nature Conservation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Maria Helena GuimarãesMaria Helena Guimarães
Maria Helena Guimarães
ACAlexandra H. Cunha
Alexandra H. Cunha
RNRosemarie L. Nzinga
Rosemarie L. Nzinga
JMJoão Filipe Marques
João Filipe Marques

30 April 2016 in European Planning Studies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Maria Helena GuimarãesMaria Helena Guimarães
Maria Helena Guimarães
LNLuis Catela Nunes
Luis Catela Nunes
ABAna Barreira
Ana Barreira
Thomas PanagopoulosThomas Panagopoulos
Thomas Panagopoulos
The attractiveness of cities as places to live determines population movements into or out of them. Understanding the appealing features is fundamental to local governments, particularly for cities facing population decline. Pull and push attributes can include economic aspects, the availability of amenities and psychological constructs, initiating a discussion around which factors are more relevant for migration. However, such discussion has been underexplored in studies of shrinking cities. In the present study, we contribute to the discussion by identifying pull and push factors in Portuguese shrinking cities. Data were collected using a face-to-face questionnaire of 701 residents in four shrinking cities: Oporto, Barreiro, Peso da Régua and Moura. Factor analysis and automatic linear modelling were used to analyse the data. Our results show that the economic activity is the most relevant feature for retaining residents. However, characteristics specific to each city, related to heritage and natural beauty, are also shown to influence a city’s attractiveness. The cause of population shrinkage was also found to influence residents’ assessments of the pull and push attributes of each city. Furthermore, the results show the relevance of social ties and of place attachment to inhabitants’ intention to continue living in their city of residence.

5 March 2018 in International Journal of Urban Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAna Barreira
Ana Barreira
LNLuís Catela Nunes
Luís Catela Nunes
Maria Helena GuimarãesMaria Helena Guimarães
Maria Helena Guimarães
Thomas PanagopoulosThomas Panagopoulos
Thomas Panagopoulos
Creating liveable cities is a policy priority, especially for cities that are experiencing population loss. A decline in the number of inhabitants is commonly associated with low levels of residential satisfaction. However, such a supposition does not often find empirical support in shrinking cities. In the present study, we identify variables that influence the level of residential satisfaction, as well as those influencing residential attraction (captured by the intention of current residents to leave their city in the near future). The study is based on a face-to-face questionnaire administered to 701 residents in four shrinking Portuguese cities. As expected, lower levels of residential satisfaction lead to an increased intention to leave the city. The results also show that the variables explaining residential satisfaction mostly differ from those explaining residential attractiveness. The specific characteristics of each city influence citizens’ assessment of residential satisfaction, but the variables impacting residential attractiveness are universal.