Marco Gaetani d'Aragona

Dr. Marco Gaetani d'Aragona

Department of Structures for Engineering and Architecture, University of Naples Federico II
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2013 in Engineering Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Marco Di LudovicoMarco Di Ludovico
Marco Di Ludovico
Maria PoleseMaria Polese
Maria Polese
Marco Gaetani d'AragonaMarco Gaetani d'Aragona
Marco Gaetani d'Aragona
APAndrea Prota
Andrea Prota
GMGaetano Manfredi
Gaetano Manfredi

24 March 2017 in Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Marco Gaetani d'AragonaMarco Gaetani d'Aragona
Marco Gaetani d'Aragona
MPMaria Polese
Maria Polese
KEKenneth J. Elwood
Kenneth J. Elwood
MSMajid Baradaran Shoraka
Majid Baradaran Shoraka
APAndrea Prota
Andrea Prota

28 September 2018 in Buildings
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Marco Gaetani d'AragonaMarco Gaetani d'Aragona
Marco Gaetani d'Aragona
Maria PoleseMaria Polese
Maria Polese
Marco Di LudovicoMarco Di Ludovico
Marco Di Ludovico
APAndrea Prota
Andrea Prota
Several studies investigated the influence of infills on the response of reinforced concrete (RC) frames. However, possible shear brittle failures are generally neglected. The interaction between the infill panels and the surrounding frames can lead to anticipated brittle-type failures that should be considered in code-based assessment of lateral seismic capacity. This paper investigates, by means of simplified pushover analyses, on the effect of infills on the lateral seismic capacity explicitly considering possible brittle failures in unconfined beam-column joints or in columns. Archetype buildings representative of existing gravity load designed (GLD) RC frames of three different height ranges are obtained with a simulated design process and a sensitivity analysis is performed to investigate on the effect of infill consistency on the capacity. Moreover, possible alternative local retrofit interventions devoted to avoiding brittle failures are considered, evaluating their relative efficacy in case of different infill typologies. It is seen that for the considered existing GLD buildings, the attainment of life safety limit state is premature and happens before the damage limitation limit state. The capacity can be increased with application of local retrofit interventions. However, the retrofit efficacy varies depending on the infills consistency if the horizontal action transferred from the infills to the surrounding frame is not absorbed by the retrofit solution.

7 February 2021 in Buildings
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Marco Gaetani d'AragonaMarco Gaetani d'Aragona
Marco Gaetani d'Aragona
Maria PoleseMaria Polese
Maria Polese
APAndrea Prota
Andrea Prota
Masonry-infilled reinforced concrete frames represent a very common construction typology across the Mediterranean countries. The presence of infills substantially modifies the global seismic performances of buildings in terms of strength, stiffness, and energy dissipation. Although several research studies focused on the overall performances of infilled reinforced concrete frames, the modeling of infill panels remains an open issue due to the complex interaction between the infill and the frame and the uncertainties involved in the definition of the problem. In the present paper, an existing masonry-infilled RC frame designed according to obsolete seismic codes is chosen as a case study. A refined three-dimensional finite element model is built for performing nonlinear static and time-history analyses in order to investigate some significant aspects related to the modeling of infills. In particular, it is investigated the effect of different infill constitutive models on the seismic performance of infilled RC building expressed in terms of engineering demand parameters such as interstory drift ratios and peak floor accelerations, and on the generation of damage fragility curves.

23 January 2021 in Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Marco Gaetani d'AragonaMarco Gaetani d'Aragona
Marco Gaetani d'Aragona
Maria PoleseMaria Polese
Maria Polese
Marco Di LudovicoMarco Di Ludovico
Marco Di Ludovico
APAndrea Prota
Andrea Prota

15 August 2018 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Maria PoleseMaria Polese
Maria Polese
Marco Gaetani d'AragonaMarco Gaetani d'Aragona
Marco Gaetani d'Aragona
Marco Di LudovicoMarco Di Ludovico
Marco Di Ludovico
APAndrea Prota
Andrea Prota
Risk reduction policies are crucial in regions of high seismic risk, having significant exposure and building vulnerability. In Italy, the Sismabonus incentive mechanism was recently approved, which regulates the possibility of benefiting tax deductions after seismic strengthening interventions on buildings. This paper presents a simplified approach for evaluating the effects of implementation of the Sismabonus policy at the territorial scale. Considering only reinforced concrete RC building typologies, a speed method for calculating the probability of being in relevant risk classes is introduced and it is applied to a town in southern Italy. The evaluation is based on simplified modeling of lateral seismic behavior and on the estimate of the peak ground acceleration corresponding to the attainment of building capacity. The effect of possible retrofit interventions is also considered. This performance-based procedure allows for taking into account the cost for selective retrofit interventions and contemporarily to estimate the variation of mean expected annual loss that is obtained with building upgrading.