Maria Polese

Prof. Maria Polese

Università degli studi di Napoli Federico II
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 November 2020 in Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MDMauro Dolce
Mauro Dolce
APAndrea Prota
Andrea Prota
BBBarbara Borzi
Barbara Borzi
FPFrancesca da Porto
Francesca da Porto
SLSergio Lagomarsino
Sergio Lagomarsino
GZGiulio Zuccaro
Giulio Zuccaro
The last National Risk Assessment NRA for Italy was developed at the end of 2018 by the Department of Civil Protection (DPC) in response to the specific requirement of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030 to periodically adjourn the assessment of disaster risk. The methodology adopted to perform seismic risk assessment and build national seismic risk maps was specifically developed to comply with the recent Code for Civil Protection, issuing that, in addition to a solid scientific base, risk assessment should be characterized by a wide consensus of the scientific community. As a result, six research units belonging to two Centers of Competence of the DPC, namely ReLUIS (Network of university laboratories for seismic engineering) and EUCENTRE (European Centre for Training and Research in Earthquake Engineering), collaborated under the guidance and coordination of DPC to produce the recent updating of national seismic risk maps for the residential building stock. This paper describes the methodology adopted to develop the consensus-based national seismic risk assessment and presents the main results in terms of expected damage and impact measures (unusable buildings, homeless, casualties, direct economic losses).

1 February 2010 in Advances in Engineering Software
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Gerardo Mario VerderameGerardo Mario Verderame
Gerardo Mario Verderame
Maria PoleseMaria Polese
Maria Polese
CMC. Mariniello
C. Mariniello
GMG. Manfredi
G. Manfredi

24 August 2012 in Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Maria PoleseMaria Polese
Maria Polese
Marco Di LudovicoMarco Di Ludovico
Marco Di Ludovico
APAndrea Prota
Andrea Prota
GMGaetano Manfredi
Gaetano Manfredi

1 June 2013 in Engineering Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Marco Di LudovicoMarco Di Ludovico
Marco Di Ludovico
Maria PoleseMaria Polese
Maria Polese
Marco Gaetani d'AragonaMarco Gaetani d'Aragona
Marco Gaetani d'Aragona
APAndrea Prota
Andrea Prota
GMGaetano Manfredi
Gaetano Manfredi

30 June 2003 in Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GMGaetano Manfredi
Gaetano Manfredi
Maria PoleseMaria Polese
Maria Polese
ECEdoardo Cosenza
Edoardo Cosenza

14 May 2008 in Journal of Earthquake Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Maria PoleseMaria Polese
Maria Polese
Gerardo Mario VerderameGerardo Mario Verderame
Gerardo Mario Verderame
CMCristiano Mariniello
Cristiano Mariniello
IIIunio Iervolino
Iunio Iervolino
GMGaetano Manfredi
Gaetano Manfredi
Damage scenario and risk analyses are helpful tools for the local administrators for mitigation of potential earthquake losses at the urban-regional level. One of the main issues in developing such scenarios is the choice of proper capacity functions expressing the effective seismic supply for the existing building classes and the convolution with demand in the so-called fragility analysis. This article, as a further implementation of a recently developed mechanical based procedure for class scale quantitative risk evaluation, presents the derivation of class representative capacity curves and the relative fragility curves for slight, moderate, extensive, and complete damage states as defined by the well-known HAZUS methodology. Starting from an extensive building survey of Arenella district in Naples, southern Italy, statistics on main model input parameters are obtained for selected building classes of existing and/or pre-code RC buildings. Accordingly, a number of building models is simulated designed and analyzed in order to determine building class capacity. Fragility curves are computed simulating the fraction of “failures” within a capacity spectrum method framework. These capacity and fragility curves have been used in a companion paper by Lang et al. [2008] for the computation of damage scenarios in Arenella