Charisis Totsikas

Dr. Charisis Totsikas

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 July 2026 in Journal of Infection
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LRLennart Riemann
Lennart Riemann
LBLena Böger
Lena Böger
CDCarina Dahl
Carina Dahl
TGTimo Gemoll
Timo Gemoll
CTCharisis Totsikas
Charisis Totsikas
CHChristine Happle
Christine Happle
People living with HIV (PLWH) carry increased risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), yet the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. We investigated whether systemic inflammatory profiles differ between PLWH with and without COPD. We analyzed serum samples from 87 PLWH: 38 with COPD and 49 without COPD, matched for age and sex. Inflammatory proteins were measured using the Olink Target 96 Inflammation panel. Modules of co-varying analytes were identified using CytoMod, and associations with clinical features were tested. Key findings were validated using ELISA. A replication analysis was conducted in 158 samples from an independent cohort. PLWH with COPD showed significantly elevated inflammatory markers. CytoMod analysis identified five modules when adjusting for background levels. Two modules were significantly associated with COPD, and comprised molecules involved in tissue damage and repair. Individual molecules including PD-L1, FGF-23, IL6, and others were significantly dysregulated. ELISA validation confirmed significantly elevated levels of IL-10RB, PD-L1, M-CSF, and IL-6 in PLWH-COPD. Key analytes and directional effects were confirmed in an independent cohort. PLWH with COPD exhibit distinct inflammatory signatures characterized by enhanced tissue damage, immune activation, and dysregulated repair mechanisms, providing insights into HIV-related COPD.

26 November 2025 in Microorganisms
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Sotirios RoussosSotirios Roussos
Sotirios Roussos
Konstantinos ProtopapasKonstantinos Protopapas
Konstantinos Protopapas
EMElpida Mastrogianni
Elpida Mastrogianni
CTCharisis Totsikas
Charisis Totsikas
Charalampos D. MoschopoulosCharalampos D. Moschopoulos
Charalampos D. Moschopoulos
MPMina Psichogiou
Mina Psichogiou
People who inject drugs (PWIDs) remain underserved in HIV care. Evidence on rapid antiretroviral therapy (ART) for PWID is limited. We evaluated feasibility, effectiveness, safety, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for rapid initiation of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) supported by a peer navigation in Greece. This is a single-arm, multicenter pilot study including PWIDs (≥18 years) newly diagnosed or relinking after >3 months off ART. Participants started BIC/FTC/TAF on the same day or within 7 days and received peer navigation for 48 weeks. Co-primary endpoints were Week-24 virologic suppression (HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL; FDA Snapshot) and grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs). Secondary endpoints included complete-case suppression at Weeks 24/48, CD4 recovery, retention, and PROs. Outcomes were compared with historical controls from the same centers. Thirty-seven participants were enrolled (83.8% male; median age 33.3 years). Median time to ART was 0 days (vs 78 in controls, p < 0.001). Retention was 67.6% at Week 24 and 54.1% at Week 48. In the primary (FDA Snapshot) analysis, suppression was 62.2% and 54.1% at Weeks 24 and 48; in complete-case analyses, results were 92.0% and 100%, respectively. Mean CD4 count increased by 208 cells/μL (95% CI 141–275) at Week 48. Quality of life improved and symptom burden decreased. No grade 3–4 AEs occurred. Rapid BIC/FTC/TAF with peer navigation eliminated delays to ART and achieved favorable virologic, immunologic, and PROs among those retained, with good tolerability. Despite retention challenges, this model appears feasible for PWID and may help close HIV care gaps toward UNAIDS 95–95–95 targets.

6 August 2026 in HIV Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LLLydia Leonidou
Lydia Leonidou
GLGiota Lourida
Giota Lourida
Konstantinos ProtopapasKonstantinos Protopapas
Konstantinos Protopapas
Charalampos D. MoschopoulosCharalampos D. Moschopoulos
Charalampos D. Moschopoulos
DZDimitrios Zoulas
Dimitrios Zoulas
MPMina Psichogiou
Mina Psichogiou
Objectives: Low‐level viraemia (LLV) persists in some people living with HIV despite antiretroviral therapy, raising concerns about virologic failure. We assessed the characteristics, management and outcomes of LLV in Greece, where next‐generation sequencing, therapeutic drug monitoring and electronic adherence monitoring are unavailable. Methods: This retrospective multicentre study included people living with HIV from four Greek clinics who had achieved virological suppression for at least 6 months. LLV was defined as two consecutive HIV‐1 RNA measurements between 51 and 200 copies/mL. Patients were followed for 18 months, during which three subsequent viral load measurements were evaluated. Adherence was assessed using patient self‐report and documentation in the medical record. Results: Among 3800 patients, 35 (0.9%) experienced LLV. Median age was 49 years, and 69% were male. Patients were treatment‐experienced (median 3.5 ART lines; median duration of viral suppression, 7 years), with 57% receiving high genetic‐barrier regimens. Baseline genotypic resistance data were available for 30 of 35 patients (85.7%), and clinically relevant resistance‐associated mutations were identified in 6 (20.0%). LLV resolved in 27 of 35 patients (77.1%), persisted in 7 (20.0%) and recurred in 1 (2.9%). No patient developed virologic failure. Presumed causes of LLV were unknown in 18 (51.4%), low adherence in 14 (40.0%) and drug–drug interactions in 3 (8.6%). ART was modified in 17 patients, of whom 13 (76.5%) achieved viral resuppression, most commonly after switching from lower‐ to higher‐genetic‐barrier regimens. One patient with persistent LLV developed lymphoma during follow‐up. Conclusions: LLV was uncommon but clinically relevant in this multicentre Greek cohort and frequently resolved following targeted management. Adherence optimization and ART modification, particularly to higher genetic‐barrier regimens, were associated with viral resuppression in this cohort. Ongoing monitoring remains essential, especially in settings with limited access to advanced diagnostic tools.

5 August 2026 in Biomedicines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
APAntonios Papadopoulos
Antonios Papadopoulos
MAMYRTO ASTRITI
MYRTO ASTRITI
VPVasileios Papastamopoulos
Vasileios Papastamopoulos
VPVassilios A. Paparizos
Vassilios A. Paparizos
HSHelen G Sambatakou
Helen G Sambatakou
LPLazaros Poughias
Lazaros Poughias
Background: Doravirine (DOR) is a new-generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, which has emerged as an option for people living with HIV (PLWH) owing to its favorable efficacy and safety profile, unique resistance pathway and limited potential for drug-drug interactions. Methods: This retrospective chart review study aimed to better understand DOR-based treatment use in Greece, PLWH characteristics, and drivers of treatment switch. Eligible individuals were adult PLWH who were switched to a DOR-based regimen based on the physician’s decision. Individuals exposed to DOR at any time prior to switching to the DOR-based regimen were excluded. Results: From 12 July 2023 to 31 October 2023, 110 PLWH were consecutively enrolled across 6 public hospital clinics. At baseline (closest prior to or on the date of first DOR prescription), the mean age of PLWH was 49.3 years, 90.9% were males, 88.2% were asymptomatic, 86.5% were virologically suppressed, 33.6% were suffering from multimorbidity (excluding infections/infestations), 45.5% were receiving comedications for their comorbidities, and 5.5% were co-infected with Hepatitis C virus. Most PLWH (98.2%) were prescribed DOR plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors; 87.3% were prescribed DOR/Lamivudine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate fixed-dose combination. PLWH started DOR a median of 11.7 years after first-ever antiretroviral therapy initiation, corresponding to 2nd/3rd/≥4th antiretroviral line in 33.6%/33.6%/32.7% of participants, respectively; 60.9% of them were proactively switched to a DOR-based regimen. The most common reasons for switching were ‘regimen simplification’ (42.7%), ‘tolerability’ (26.4%) and ‘prevention of toxicities’ (18.2%). Conclusions: This study highlights the patterns of DOR use in real-life clinical practice in Greece among treatment-experienced PLWH. Physicians switch HIV-1-infected individuals from prior ART to DOR-based regimens to offer a simplified regimen or to avoid or prevent toxicity.