The EU–Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA), whose ratification process started following the European Commission’s decision on 3 September 2025, is one of the EU’s most comprehensive trade agreements. From the outset, it raised serious concerns among environmental organizations about the risk of accelerating deforestation in the Amazon, potentially exacerbated by the liberalization of trade in agricultural products. This article analyzes the problem of enforcing the environmental provisions of the agreement in the context of deforestation. We argue that the effectiveness of these clauses is fundamentally undermined by two interrelated challenges: the limitations of the legal mechanisms enshrined in the agreement and the increasing ambiguity of data used to monitor deforestation. Using statistical analysis of time series (2002–2024)—including Student’s t-test for dependent samples, Spearman rank correlation, and trend regression models—the nature and trend of increasing divergence between two major indicators of deforestation, namely the official Brazilian PRODES and the Global Forest Watch (GFW), were quantified. The results show a systematic and statistically significant discrepancy between indicators, which has structurally widened since 2015. This fundamental ambiguity of data creates a serious “enforcement gap”, allowing us to challenge the scale of the violations and may, in practice, prevent the effective application of the environmental clauses of the agreement, undermining the EU’s policy objectives related to the EUDR and the Green Deal. The article also outlines institutional options to address this enforcement gap by strengthening the transparency, consistency, and evidentiary use of deforestation data in the implementation of the agreement.

This study investigates the spatial exposure of Brazil’s Legal Amazon (BLA) as the deforestation frontier, operationalized as Brazil’s legally defined Amazon Legal administrative region, in Brazil’s commodity exports to its two largest partners: the European Union (EU) and China. Focusing on agricultural, forestry and mining commodity groups, a destination-specific Relative Concentration Ratio (RCR) and Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) on physical trade data (2002–2024) were used to examine whether contrasting trade governance logics—the regulatory “Brussels Effect” and the scale-driven “Beijing Effect”—are associated with different sourcing geographies from the BLA frontier. We test three competing expectations: EU spatial avoidance, higher Chinese frontier dependence, and compliance-driven consolidation. The results reveal a counterintuitive paradox: despite stricter sustainability governance, the EU displays persistently higher frontier dependence than China in key commodity groups, with RCR trajectories indicating stabilization rather than spatial avoidance. In contrast, China’s frontier dependence declines over time in selected sectors even as import volumes expand substantially, highlighting that changes in frontier exposure cannot be inferred from trade scale alone. CAGR patterns further show strong growth in China-related trade at the national level across commodity groups, alongside sector-specific frontier dynamics within BLA. Overall, the findings provide the strongest support for the consolidation hypothesis: compliance and traceability requirements—public and private—may concentrate EU-linked sourcing among highly auditable, capitalized producers embedded in established frontier zones. These results imply that without explicit spatial targeting, demand-side regulations such as the EUDR may improve product-level assurances yet fail to induce a geographic shift away from deforestation frontiers, potentially reinforcing trade links with established producers in high-risk regions.

The aim of the article is to present the practice of using the image for commercial purposes, with particular emphasis on using the image in advertisements and promotional campaigns for insurance products, discussing the most important regulations governing this issue and also formulating de lege ferenda postulates concerning the use of the image for commercial purposes. The research methodology within the article included an analysis of the regulations on the use of the image of well-known persons in Polish legal acts, court rulings, with particular emphasis on the protection of the image and its use in advertising, and a review of available information on the cooperation of insurance market entities with well-known persons with regard to the use of their image for commercial purposes.