In recent decades, significant efforts have been devoted to constructing energy-efficient buildings, providing comfortable indoor environments. However, measures such as enhanced airtightness, while reducing infiltration through the building envelope, might consequently reduce natural ventilation. This reduction is a critical concern because natural ventilation is an essential factor in controlling indoor air quality (IAQ), and its diminution could therefore worsen IAQ. Sick building syndrome has emerged as a term used to describe health hazards linked to the time spent indoors but with no particular cause. Since people spend most of their time indoors, the demand for continuous and real-time IAQ management to reduce human exposure to pollutants has increased considerably. In this context, low-cost sensors (LCS) for IAQ monitoring have become popular, driven by recent technological advancements and increased awareness regarding indoor air pollution and its negative health impacts. Although LCS do not meet the performance requirements of reference and regulatory equipment, they provide informative measurements, offering high-resolution monitoring, emission source identification, exposure mitigation, real-time IAQ assessment, and energy efficiency management. This perspective article proposes a general model for LCS systems (and subsystems) implementation and presents a prospective analysis of their strengths and limitations for IAQ management, reviews the literature regarding sensor system technologies, and offers design recommendations. It provides valuable insights for researchers and practitioners in the field of IAQ and discusses future trends.

Keywords: Vulnerability, Exposure, Earth Observation, Land Cover / Land Use, Urban Heat Island, Air Pollution, City Models Risk situation can be mitigated by prevention measures, early warning tools and adequate monitoring of past experiences where Earth Observation and geospatial analysis have an adding value. This paper discusses the potential use of Earth Observation data and especially Land Cover / Land Use map in addressing within the three aspects of the risk assessment: danger, exposure and vulnerability. Evidences of the harmful effects of air pollution or heat waves are widely admitted and should increase in the context of global warming. Moreover, urban areas are generally warmer than rural surroundings, the so-called urban heat island. Combined with in-situ measurements, this paper presents models of city or local climate (air pollution and urban heat island), with a resolution of less than one kilometer, developed by integrating several sources of information including Earth Observation data and in particular Land Cover / Land Use. This assessment of the danger is then be related to a map of exposure and vulnerable people. Using dasymetric method to disaggregate statistical information on Land Cover / Land Use data, the SmartPop project analyzes in parallel the map of danger with the maps of people exposure A special focus on some categories at risk such as the elderly has been proposed by Aubrecht and Ozceylan (2013). Perspectives of the project includes the integration of a new Land Cover / Land Use map in the danger, exposure and vulnerability models and proposition of several aspects of risk assessment with the stakeholders of Wallonia.

The increasing availability of low-cost sensors and open source projects make it easier than ever for a maker to build his own air quality node. Nonetheless, depending on one’s goal and its related data quality objective, to customize an existing project or to build a specific printed circuit board may still be very useful. In the framework of the Outdoor and Indoor Exposure project, a portable mini-station has been developed, tested and then used in two experiments: exposure assessment and complementary network measurement. The present paper focuses on the description of the equipment that was designed and prototyped, as well as on the tests that were made in the lab and in the field to evaluate its overall performance and that of its different sensors. Finally, we present what we consider to be its main drawbacks and our perspectives for further development and tests.