Definições das Recomendações e Evidências […] Diretrizes da Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia sobre Angina Instável e Infarto Agudo do Miocárdio sem Supradesnível do Segmento ST – 2021 Definições das Recomendações e Evidências […] Diretrizes da Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia sobre Angina Instável e Infarto Agudo do Miocárdio sem Supradesnível do Segmento ST – 2021

Exercise training (ET) can lower platelet reactivity in patients with cardiovascular risk factors. However, the effects of ET on platelet reactivity in higher-risk patients is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of ET on platelet reactivity in patients with recent myocardial infarction (MI). Ninety patients were randomly assigned 1 month post-MI to the intervention (patients submitted to a supervised ET program) or control group. All patients were on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Platelet reactivity by VerifyNow-P2Y₁₂ (measured by P2Y₁₂ reaction units – PRUs) test was determined at baseline and at the end of 14 ± 2 weeks of follow-up at rest (primary endpoint), and multiplate electrode aggregometry (MEA) adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and aspirin (ASPI) tests were performed immediately before and after the maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) at the same time points (secondary endpoints). Sixty-five patients (mean age 58.9 ± 10 years; 73.8% men; 60% ST elevation MI) completed follow-up (control group, n = 31; intervention group, n = 34). At the end of the follow-up, the mean platelet reactivity was 172.8 ± 68.9 PRUs and 166.9 ± 65.1 PRUs for the control and intervention groups, respectively (p = .72). Platelet reactivity was significantly increased after the CPET compared to rest at the beginning and at the end of the 14-week follow-up (among the intervention groups) by the MEA-ADP and MEA-ASPI tests (p < .01 for all analyses). In post-MI patients on DAPT, 14 weeks of supervised ET did not reduce platelet reactivity. Moreover, platelet reactivity was increased after high-intensity exercise (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02958657; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02958657). What is the context? What’s new? What’s the impact?

Endothelial function plays an important role not only in atherogenesis but also in the instability of atherosclerotic plaques. Alemayehu et al. designed a prospective, randomized, crossover, open-label study in patients with stable coronary disease in order to test the role of clopidogrel and ticagrelor on vascular reactivity. Relative to the baseline, both compounds improved the vascular reactivity significantly. On the other hand, the comparison between ticagrelor and clopidogrel was significantly favorable to ticagrelor. These results raise the hypothesis that the beneficial effects of ticagrelor in comparison with clopidogrel, previously demonstrated in PLATO and PEGASUS, large clinical trials focused on hard endpoints, could be explained, at least in part, by its effect on endothelial function.

Resumo Fundamento O maior risco de se desenvolver diabetes com o uso de estatinas é um desafio para a segurança do uso dessa classe de medicamentos em longo prazo. No entanto, poucos estudos analisaram essa questão durante síndromes coronarianas agudas (SCA). Objetivos Investigar a associação entre início precoce da terapia com estatina e níveis de glicemia em pacientes admitidos com SCA. Métodos Este foi um estudo retrospectivo de pacientes hospitalizados por SCA. Pacientes que nunca haviam usado estatinas foram incluídos [...] Resumo Fundamento O maior risco de se desenvolver diabetes com o uso de estatinas é um desafio para a segurança do uso dessa classe de medicamentos em longo prazo. No entanto, poucos estudos analisaram essa questão durante síndromes coronarianas agudas (SCA). Objetivos Investigar a associação entre início precoce da terapia com estatina e níveis de glicemia em pacientes admitidos com SCA. Métodos Este foi um estudo retrospectivo de pacientes hospitalizados por SCA. Pacientes que nunca haviam usado estatinas foram incluídos

High platelet reactivity (HPR) in patients with coronary artery disease receiving P2Y12 inhibitors increases ischemic risk. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an established contributor to HPR during clopidogrel therapy. The objective of the study was to assess whether CKD influences platelet reactivity (PR) in patients treated with clopidogrel or ticagrelor. This double-blind, double-dummy study enrolled 106 stable patients more than one year after an acute coronary syndrome, with or without CKD. Participants were matched by age and sex and randomized to clopidogrel or ticagrelor. PR was measured using the VerifyNow™ P2Y12 assay, and HPR was defined as P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) ≥ 208. Median glomerular filtration rates were 80 mL/min/1.73 m² in non-CKD patients and 41 mL/min/1.73 m² in CKD patients (p < 0.01). Ticagrelor produced similarly low PR in both groups (36 vs. 35 PRU; p = 0.61). Clopidogrel resulted in a numerically higher PR in CKD patients (209 vs. 180 PRU; p = 0.07). The magnitude of PR reduction with ticagrelor relative to clopidogrel was greater in CKD patients (p-interaction = 0.09). HPR was markedly more common with clopidogrel, particularly in CKD (difference 37%; adjusted OR 4.42; p = 0.01). In conclusion, CKD significantly impairs clopidogrel responsiveness but does not affect ticagrelor, resulting in a greater relative advantage of ticagrelor in patients with CKD.