Luciano Baracioli

Luciano Baracioli

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 May 2023 in Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KRKalil-Filho Roberto
Kalil-Filho Roberto
RSRoberta Saretta
Roberta Saretta
AFAndré Franci
André Franci
LBLuciano Baracioli
Luciano Baracioli
FGFilomena R. B. G. Galas
Filomena R. B. G. Galas
LDLuciano F. Drager
Luciano F. Drager
Resumo Fundamento A maioria da evidência sobre o impacto da síndrome COVID pós-aguda (PACS, do inglês, post-acute COVID-19 syndrome) descreve sintomas individuais sem correlacioná-los com exames de imagens. Objetivos Avaliar sintomas cardiopulmonares, seus preditores e imagens relacionadas em pacientes com COVID-19 após alta hospitalar. Métodos Pacientes consecutivos, que sobreviveram à COVID-19, foram contatados 90 dias após a alta hospitalar. A equipe de desfechos clínicos (cega quanto aos dados durante a internação) elaborou um questionário estruturado avaliando sintomas e estado clínico. [...] Resumo Fundamento A maioria da evidência sobre o impacto da síndrome COVID pós-aguda (PACS, do inglês, post-acute COVID-19 syndrome) descreve sintomas individuais sem correlacioná-los com exames de imagens. Objetivos Avaliar sintomas cardiopulmonares, seus preditores e imagens relacionadas em pacientes com COVID-19 após alta hospitalar. Métodos Pacientes consecutivos, que sobreviveram à COVID-19, foram contatados 90 dias após a alta hospitalar. A equipe de desfechos clínicos (cega quanto aos dados durante a internação) elaborou um questionário estruturado avaliando sintomas e estado clínico.

1 June 2009 in Clinics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JNJosé Nicolau
José Nicolau
PLPedro A. Lemos
Pedro A. Lemos
MWMaurício Wajngarten
Maurício Wajngarten
RGRoberto R. Giraldez
Roberto R. Giraldez
CJCarlos Vicente Serrano Junior
Carlos Vicente Serrano Junior
NSNoedir A. Stolf
Noedir A. Stolf
In elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction, very little is known about the role of surgical myocardial revascularization and percutaneous coronary intervention (invasive therapies--IT), especially in the context of long-term outcomes after hospital discharge. We analyzed 1588 patients with MI who had been included prospectively in a databank and followed for up to 7.5 years. In this population, 548 patients were >70 years old (elderly group--EG), and 1040 were <70 years of age (younger group--YG); 1088 underwent IT during hospitalization, and the remaining 500 were treated medically (conservative therapy--CT). Patients were monitored either by visit or by phone at least once a year. A standard questionnaire was administered to all patients. The impact of IT was analyzed with both non-adjusted and adjusted models. By the end of the follow-up period, the survival rates for the IT and CT groups were, respectively, 71.9% versus 47.2% in the global population (hazard ratio=0.55, P<0.001), 81.5% versus 66.6% in the YG (hazard ratio=0.68, P=0.018) and 48.8% versus 20.3% in the EG (hazard ratio=0.58, P<0.001). In the adjusted models, the hazard ratios were 0.62 (P<0.001) in the global population, 0.74 in the YG (P=0.073) and 0.64 (P=0.001) in the EG. Long-term follow-up of patients with myocardial infarction revealed that IT during the in-hospital phase was at least as effective in elderly patients as in younger patients.

29 September 2022 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PGPAULO Rizzo GENESTRETI
PAULO Rizzo GENESTRETI
Remo H. M. FurtadoRemo H. M. Furtado
Remo H. M. Furtado
RSRocío Salsoso
Rocío Salsoso
TDTalia F. Dalçóquio
Talia F. Dalçóquio
AFAndre Franci
Andre Franci
JNJosé Nicolau
José Nicolau
Background: The management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) presents several challenges in patients with diabetes, among them the higher rate of recurrent thrombotic events, hyperglycemia and risk of subsequent heart failure (HF). The objective of our study was to evaluate effects of DPP-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) on platelet reactivity (main objective) and cardiac risk markers. Methods: We performed a single-center double-blind randomized trial. A total of 70 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) with AMI Killip ≤2 on dual-antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel) were randomized to receive sitagliptin 100 mg or saxagliptin 5 mg daily or matching placebo. Platelet reactivity was assessed at baseline, 4 days (primary endpoint) and 30 days (secondary endpoint) after randomization, using VerifyNow Aspirin™ assay, expressed as aspirin reaction units (ARUs); B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) in pg/mL was assessed at baseline and 30 days after (secondary endpoint). Results: Mean age was 62.6 ± 8.8 years, 45 (64.3%) male, and 52 (74.3%) of patients presented with ST-segment elevation MI. For primary endpoint, there were no differences in mean platelet reactivity (p = 0.51) between the DPP-4i (8.00 {−65.00; 63.00}) and placebo (−14.00 {−77.00; 52.00}) groups, as well in mean BNP levels (p = 0.14) between DPP-4i (−36.00 {−110.00; 15.00}) and placebo (−13.00 {−50.00; 27.00}). There was no difference between groups in cardiac adverse events. Conclusions: DPP4 inhibitor did not reduce platelet aggregation among patients with type 2 diabetes hospitalized with AMI. Moreover, the use of DPP-4i did not show an increase in BNP levels or in the incidence of cardiac adverse events. These findings suggests that DPP-4i could be an option for management of T2DM patients with acute MI.

1 October 2021 in IJC Heart & Vasculature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PGPatrícia O. Guimarães
Patrícia O. Guimarães
FSFrancis R. de Souza
Francis R. de Souza
RLRenato D. Lopes
Renato D. Lopes
CBCristina Bittar
Cristina Bittar
FCFrancisco A. Cardozo
Francisco A. Cardozo
RFRoberto Kalil Filho
Roberto Kalil Filho
Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) may present high risk features during hospitalization, including cardiovascular manifestations. However, less is known about the factors that may further increase the risk of death in these patients. We included patients with COVID-19 and high risk features according to clinical and/or laboratory criteria at 21 sites in Brazil from June 10th to October 23rd of 2020. All variables were collected until hospital discharge or in-hospital death. A total of 2546 participants were included (mean age 65 years; 60.3% male). Overall, 70.8% were admitted to intensive care units and 54.2% had elevated troponin levels. In-hospital mortality was 41.7%. An interaction among sex, age and mortality was found (p = 0.007). Younger women presented higher rates of death than men (30.0% vs 22.9%), while older men presented higher rates of death than women (57.6% vs 49.2%). The strongest factors associated with in-hospital mortality were need for mechanical ventilation (odds ratio [OR] 8.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.4–12.7), elevated C-reactive protein (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.7–2.9), cancer (OR 1.8, 95 %CI 1.2–2.9), and elevated troponin levels (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4–2.3). A risk score was developed for risk assessment of in-hospital mortality. This cohort showed that patients with COVID-19 and high risk features have an elevated rate of in-hospital mortality with differences according to age and sex. These results highlight unique aspects of this population and might help identifying patients who may benefit from more careful initial surveillance and potential subsequent interventional therapies.

15 February 2022 in Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DCDaniela Calderaro
Daniela Calderaro
LBLuciana Dornfeld Bichuette
Luciana Dornfeld Bichuette
PMPamela Camara Maciel
Pamela Camara Maciel
FCFrancisco Akira Malta Cardozo
Francisco Akira Malta Cardozo
HRHenrique Ribeiro
Henrique Ribeiro
BCBruno Caramelli
Bruno Caramelli
1. Introdução O cuidado de pacientes submetidos à intervenção coronária percutânea (ICP) e à eventual necessidade de cirurgia não cardíaca precoce é um dos tópicos que gera mais debate em medicina perioperatória, pois envolve questões importantes sobre o manejo da terapia antitrombótica, além das questões habituais de manejo do risco cardíaco em coronariopatia. Se, por um lado, é necessário lidar com o risco hemorrágico, inerente à cirurgia e potencializado pelos antiagregantes plaquetários, por outro, é fundamental considerar o aumento do [...] 1. Introdução O cuidado de pacientes submetidos à intervenção coronária percutânea (ICP) e à eventual necessidade de cirurgia não cardíaca precoce é um dos tópicos que gera mais debate em medicina perioperatória, pois envolve questões importantes sobre o manejo da terapia antitrombótica, além das questões habituais de manejo do risco cardíaco em coronariopatia. Se, por um lado, é necessário lidar com o risco hemorrágico, inerente à cirurgia e potencializado pelos antiagregantes plaquetários, por outro, é fundamental considerar o aumento do

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JNJosé Nicolau
José Nicolau
TDTalia F. Dalcoquio
Talia F. Dalcoquio
RGRoberto R. Giraldez
Roberto R. Giraldez
FFFatima Rodrigues Freitas
Fatima Rodrigues Freitas
ANAndre Moreira Nicolau
Andre Moreira Nicolau
RMRaul Cavalcante Maranhao
Raul Cavalcante Maranhao
High-density lipoprotein (HDL) is associated with decreased incidence of cardiovascular events, and its functionality also influences prognosis. Exercise is an important tool to improve prognosis in the post-infarction (MI) population, but the role of exercise on HDL functionality is poorly understood. Sixty-two patients with acute MI were randomized in a supervised exercise program for 12–14 weeks (exercise group—EG) or a control group (CG). The main objective of the study was to analyze the role of exercise on esterified cholesterol (EC) and unesterified cholesterol (UC) transfer to HDL. For the total population, the baseline mean rate of EC transfer to HDL was 2.53 ± 0.83 and at the end of follow-up, it was 2.74 ± 0.64 (p = 0.03). The figures for UC were, respectively, 4.08 ± 1.2 and 4.4 ± 1.06 (p = 0.02). The difference (follow-up minus baseline) for EC was 0.15 ± 0.84 for the control group and 0.27 ± 0.69 for the exercise group (p = 0.53); for UC, the figures were 0.28 ± 1.14 and 0.35 ± 0.96 (p = 0.80), respectively, for the control and exercise groups. In post-MI patients, 12–14 weeks of supervised exercise did not improve HDL functionality.