This work introduces a generic, machine learning (ML)-based platform for functional reverse engineering (RE) of circuits. Our proposed platform GNN-RE leverages the notion of graph neural networks (GNNs) to: 1) represent and analyze flattened/unstructured gate-level netlists; 2) automatically identify the boundaries between the modules or subcircuits implemented in such netlists; and 3) classify the subcircuits based on their functionalities. For GNNs in general, each graph node is tailored to learn about its own features and its neighboring nodes, which is a powerful approach for the detection of any kind of subgraphs of interest. For GNN-RE , in particular, each node represents a gate and is initialized with a feature vector that reflects on the functional and structural properties of its neighboring gates. GNN-RE also learns the global structure of the circuit, which facilitates identifying the boundaries between subcircuits in a flattened netlist. Initially, to provide high-quality data for training of GNN-RE , we deploy a comprehensive dataset of foundational designs/components with differing functionalities, implementation styles, bit widths, and interconnections. GNN-RE is then tested on the unseen shares of this custom dataset, as well as the EPFL benchmarks, the ISCAS-85 benchmarks, and the 74X series benchmarks. GNN-RE achieves an average accuracy of 98.82% in terms of mapping individual gates to modules, all without any manual intervention or postprocessing. We also release our code and source data.

Logic locking aims to protect the intellectual property (IP) of integrated circuit (IC) designs throughout the globalized supply chain. The SAIL attack, based on tailored machine learning (ML) models, circumvents combinational logic locking with high accuracy and is amongst the most potent attacks as it does not require a functional IC acting as an oracle. In this work, we propose UNSAIL, a logic locking technique that inserts key-gate structures with the specific aim to confuse ML models like those used in SAIL. More specifically, UNSAIL serves to prevent attacks seeking to resolve the structural transformations of synthesis-induced obfuscation, which is an essential step for logic locking. Our approach is generic; it can protect any local structure of key-gates against such ML-based attacks in an oracle-less setting. We develop a reference implementation for the SAIL attack and launch it on both traditionally locked and UNSAIL-locked designs. For SAIL, two ML models have been proposed (which we implement accordingly), namely a change-prediction model and a reconstruction model; the change-prediction model is used to determine which key-gate structures to restore using the reconstruction model. Our study on benchmarks ranging from the ISCAS-85 and ITC-99 suites to the OpenRISC Reference Platform System-on-Chip (ORPSoC) confirms that UNSAIL degrades the accuracy of the change-prediction model and the reconstruction model by an average of 20.13 and 17 percentage points (pp), respectively. When the aforementioned models are combined, which is the most powerful scenario for SAIL, UNSAIL reduces the attack accuracy of SAIL by an average of 11pp. We further demonstrate that UNSAIL thwarts other oracle-less attacks, i.e., SWEEP and the redundancy attack, indicating the generic nature and strength of our approach. Detailed layout-level evaluations illustrate that UNSAIL incurs minimal area and power overheads of 0.26% and 0.61%, respectively, on the million-gate ORPSoC design.

For the first time, we leverage the 2.5D interposer technology to establish system-level security in the face of hardware- and software-centric adversaries. More specifically, we integrate chiplets (i.e., third-party hard intellectual property of complex functionality, like microprocessors) using a security-enforcing interposer. Such hardware organization provides a robust 2.5D root of trust for trustworthy, yet powerful and flexible, computation systems. The security paradigms for our scheme, employed firmly by design and construction, are: 1) stringent physical separation of trusted from untrusted components, and 2) runtime monitoring. The system-level activities of all untrusted commodity chiplets are checked continuously against security policies via physically separated security features. Aside from the security promises, the good economics of outsourced supply chains are still maintained; the system vendor is free to procure chiplets from the open market, while only producing the interposer and assembling the 2.5D system oneself. We showcase our scheme using the Cortex-M0 core and the AHB-Lite bus by ARM, to build a secure 64-core system with shared memories. We evaluate our scheme through hardware simulation, considering different threat scenarios. Finally, we devise a physical-design flow for 2.5D systems, based on commercial-grade design tools, to demonstrate our 2.5D root of trust.

Process variations and device aging impose profound challenges for circuit designers. Without a precise understanding of the impact of variations on the delay of circuit paths, guardbands, which keep timing violations at bay, cannot be correctly estimated. This problem is exacerbated for advanced technology nodes, where transistor dimensions reach atomic levels and established margins are severely constrained. Hence, traditional worst-case analysis becomes impractical, resulting in intolerable performance overheads. Contrarily, process-variation/aging-aware static timing analysis (STA) equips designers with accurate statistical delay distributions. Timing guardbands that are small, yet sufficient, can then be effectively estimated. However, such analysis is costly as it requires intensive Monte-Carlo simulations. Further, it necessitates access to confidential physics-based aging models to generate the standard-cell libraries required for STA. In this work, we employ graph neural networks (GNNs) to accurately estimate the impact of process variations and device aging on the delay of any path within a circuit. Our proposed GNN4REL framework empowers designers to perform rapid and accurate reliability estimations without accessing transistor models, standard-cell libraries, or even STA; these components are all incorporated into the GNN model via training by the foundry. Specifically, GNN4REL is trained on a FinFET technology model that is calibrated against industrial 14nm measurement data. Through our extensive experiments on EPFL and ITC-99 benchmarks, as well as RISC-V processors, we successfully estimate delay degradations of all paths -notably within seconds -with a mean absolute error down to 0.01 percentage points.

Emerging nanotechnologies based reconfigurable field-effect transistors (RFETs) allow switching between p-type and n-type behavior at runtime upon application of different bias potentials. While prior works have mainly focused on security schemes using RFETs, here we revisit the underlying security promises, and furthermore, showcase certain circuit vulnerabilities which can lead to adversarial scenarios. More specifically, first, we explore how transistor-level reconfigurability can be leveraged for logic locking and split manufacturing in the pretext of RFET-based modeling of the ITC-99 circuits. We find that with only 30% reconfigurable logic gates, we can induce 100% output error rate (OER) and 31% Hamming distance(HD) on split-manufacturing schemes. Second, which is arguably more disruptive, we explore how the very reconfigurability can be exploited to induce either short-circuit or open-circuit configurations, essentially destroying the reliability, electrical, or functional characteristics of the chip. By means of fault modeling for such exploitation, 100% OER (across all benchmarks) as well as 36.5%, 40.02%, and 6.34% HD, respectively, can be expected for the MCNC, EPFL, and ITC-99 benchmarks. The novelty and severity of such disruptive scenario lies in the fact that they can be readily realized in an actual on-field RFET-based chip, either as an adversarial or a fail-safe measure.

Layout camouflaging can protect the intellectual property of modern circuits. Most prior art, however, incurs excessive layout overheads and necessitates customization of active-device manufacturing processes, i.e., the front-end-of-line (FEOL). As a result, camouflaging has typically been applied selectively, which can ultimately undermine its resilience. Here, we propose a low-cost and generic scheme—full-chip camouflaging can be finally realized without reservations. Our scheme is based on obfuscating the interconnects, i.e., the back-end-of-line (BEOL), through design-time handling for real and dummy wires and vias. To that end, we implement custom, BEOL-centric obfuscation cells, and develop a CAD flow using industrial tools. Our scheme can be applied to any design and technology node without FEOL-level modifications. Considering its BEOL-centric nature, we advocate applying our scheme in conjunction with split manufacturing, to furthermore protect against untrusted fabs. We evaluate our scheme for various designs at the physical, DRC-clean layout level. Our scheme incurs a significantly lower cost than most of the prior art. Notably, for fully camouflaged layouts, we observe average power, performance, and area overheads of 24.96%, 19.06%, and 32.55%, respectively. We conduct a thorough security study addressing the threats (attacks) related to untrustworthy FEOL fabs (proximity attacks) and malicious end-users (SAT-based attacks). An empirical key finding is that only large-scale camouflaging schemes like ours are practically secure against powerful SAT-based attacks. Another key finding is that our scheme hinders both placement-and routing-centric proximity attacks; correct connections are reduced by 7.47X, and complexity is increased by 24.15X, respectively, for such attacks.