Drones are becoming increasingly valuable tools in wildlife studies due to their ability to access remote areas and offer high-resolution information with minimal human interference. Their application is, however, causing concern regarding wildlife disturbance. This review synthesizes the existing literature on how animals within terrestrial, aerial, and aquatic environments are impacted by drone disturbance in relation to operational variables, sensory stimulation, species-specific sensitivity, and physiological and behavioral responses. We found that drone altitude, speed, approach distance, and noise levels significantly influence wildlife responses, with some species exhibiting increased vigilance, flight responses, or physiological stress. Environmental context and visual cues are also involved in species detection of drones and disturbance thresholds. Although the short-term response to behavior change has been well documented, long-term consequences of repeated drone exposure remain poorly known. This paper identifies the necessity for continued research into drone–wildlife interactions, with an emphasis on the requirement to minimize disturbance by means of improved flight parameters and technology.

Drones are increasingly popular for collecting behaviour data of group‐living animals, offering inexpensive and minimally disruptive observation methods. Imagery collected by drones can be rapidly analysed using computer vision techniques to extract information, including behaviour classification, habitat analysis and identification of individual animals. While computer vision techniques can rapidly analyse drone‐collected data, the success of these analyses often depends on careful mission planning that considers downstream computational requirements—a critical factor frequently overlooked in current studies. We present a comprehensive summary of research in the growing AI‐driven animal ecology (ADAE) field, which integrates data collection with automated computational analysis focused on aerial imagery for collective animal behaviour studies. We systematically analyse current methodologies, technical challenges and emerging solutions in this field, from drone mission planning to behavioural inference. We illustrate computer vision pipelines that infer behaviour from drone imagery and present the computer vision tasks used for each step. We map specific computational tasks to their ecological applications, providing a framework for future research design. Our analysis reveals AI‐driven animal ecology studies for collective animal behaviour using drone imagery focus on detection and classification computer vision tasks. While convolutional neural networks (CNNs) remain dominant for detection and classification tasks, newer architectures like transformer‐based models and specialized video analysis networks (e.g. X3D, I3D, SlowFast) designed for temporal pattern recognition are gaining traction for pose estimation and behaviour inference. However, reported model accuracy varies widely by computer vision task, species, habitats and evaluation metrics, complicating meaningful comparisons between studies. Based on current trends, we conclude semi‐autonomous drone missions will be increasingly used to study collective animal behaviour. While manual drone operation remains prevalent, autonomous drone manoeuvrers, powered by edge AI, can scale and standardise collective animal behavioural studies while reducing the risk of disturbance and improving data quality. We propose guidelines for AI‐driven animal ecology drone studies adaptable to various computer vision tasks, species and habitats. This approach aims to collect high‐quality behaviour data while minimising disruption to the ecosystem.

Drones are becoming increasingly valuable tools in wildlife studies due to their ability to 1 access remote areas and offer high-resolution information with minimal human interference. Their 2 application is, however, causing concern regarding wildlife disturbance. This review synthesizes the 3 existing literature on how animals within terrestrial, aerial, and aquatic environments are impacted by 4 drone disturbance in relation to operational variables, sensory stimulation, species-specific sensitivity, 5 and physiological and behavioral responses. We found that drone altitude, speed, approach distance, 6 and noise levels significantly influence wildlife responses, with some species exhibiting increased 7 vigilance, flight responses, or physiological stress. Environmental context and visual cues are also 8 involved in species detection of drones and disturbance thresholds. Although the short-term response 9 to behaviour change has been well documented, long-term consequences of repeated drone exposure 10 remain poorly known. This paper identifies the necessity for continued research into drone-wildlife 11 interactions, with an emphasis on the requirement to minimize disturbance by means of improved 12 flight parameters and technology.

The demand for multi-rotors is increasing rapidly, with multi-rotors used for inspection, photography, search and rescue, data-gathering, law enforcement, and much more. This paper aims to demystify the challenges in drone design for the growing community of drone users. It details the process of designing a multi-rotor and proposes a convenient tool made publicly available ¹ to efficiently find the optimal multi-rotor configuration given specific design criteria.

Safe Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS) operations are increasingly required for wildlife monitoring and conservation, yet existing regulatory frameworks are rarely tailored to protected areas characterised by low population density and limited infrastructure. This paper presents a field-based use case illustrating how the Specific Operations Risk Assessment (SORA) methodology can be applied to conservation-oriented BVLOS missions under Kenyan airspace conditions, including coordination within military-controlled airspace. We evaluate three population-density estimation approaches (qualitative, bottom-up, and top-down) against available ground truth, and compare tabulated and analytical SORA methods for deriving the Ground Risk Class. The work illustrates how SORA 2.5 structures ground and air risk reasoning in a conservation context, while retrospective review identifies limitations in containment, Operational Safety Objectives, and tactical mitigation performance requirements. Field trials involved five concurrent teams and 30 personnel conducting over 260 flights and more than 60 h of UAS activity across the Ol Pejeta Conservancy, providing insights into multi-team coordination under field conditions. Field implementation revealed areas of misalignment between prescribed safety requirements and operational realities, prompting iterative adaptation of workflows and procedures. Observed outcomes included reductions in team size (25–50%) and procedural steps (18%), derived from retrospective comparison of field procedures. A lightweight Uncrewed Traffic Management prototype was also trialled, revealing practical limitations in conservancy environments. Finally, we present a ten-step framework for developing field-ready safety procedures to support risk-informed decision-making in non-standard operational contexts. The findings provide empirically grounded guidance on applying SORA principles to conservation UAS missions, without proposing a new risk framework or generalised operational model.