Sebastian Weingärtner

Dr. Sebastian Weingärtner

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2014 in Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SRSébastien Roujol
Sébastien Roujol
SWSebastian Weingärtner
Sebastian Weingärtner
MFMurilo Foppa
Murilo Foppa
KCKelvin Chow
Kelvin Chow
KKKeigo Kawaji
Keigo Kawaji
RNReza Nezafat
Reza Nezafat
Saturation recovery single-shot acquisition and saturation pulse prepared heart rate independent inversion recovery have superior accuracy, inferior precision, and similar reproducibility compared ... PurposeTo compare accuracy, precision, and reproducibility of four commonly used myocardial T1 mapping sequences: modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI), shortened MOLLI (ShMOLLI), saturat...

6 May 2013 in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SWSebastian Weingärtner
Sebastian Weingärtner
MAMehmet Akcakaya
Mehmet Akcakaya
TBTamer Basha
Tamer Basha
KKKraig V. Kissinger
Kraig V. Kissinger
BGBeth Goddu
Beth Goddu
RNReza Nezafat
Reza Nezafat
Purpose: To develop arrhythmia‐insensitive inversion recovery sequences for improved visualization of myocardial scar and quantification of diffuse fibrosis.Methods: A novel preparation pre‐pulse, called saturation pulse prepared heart‐rate‐independent inversion recovery, is introduced, which consists of a combination of saturation and inversion pulses to remove the magnetization history in each heartbeat in late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging and eliminate the need for rest periods in T1 mapping. The proposed LGE and T1 mapping sequences were evaluated against conventional LGE and modified Look‐Locker inversion sequences using numerical simulations, phantom and imaging in healthy subjects and patients with suspected or known cardiovascular disease.Results: Simulations and phantom experiments show that the saturation pulse prepared heart‐rate‐independent inversion recovery pre‐pulse in LGE reduces ghosting artifacts and results in perfect nulling of the healthy myocardium in the presence of arrhythmia. In T1 mapping, saturation pulse prepared heart‐rate‐independent inversion recovery results in (a) reduced scan time (17 vs. 9 heartbeats), (b) insensitivity to heart rate for long T1, and (c) increased signal homogeneity for short T1. LGE images in a patient in atrial fibrillation during the scan show improved myocardial nulling. In vivo T1 maps demonstrate increased signal homogeneity in blood pools and myocardium.Conclusion: The proposed sequences are insensitive to heart rate variability, yield improved LGE images in the presence of arrhythmias, as well as T1 mapping with shorter scan times. Magn Reson Med 71:1024–1034, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

16 June 2017 in Heart Failure Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DRDina Radenkovic
Dina Radenkovic
SWSebastian Weingärtner
Sebastian Weingärtner
LRLewis Ricketts
Lewis Ricketts
JMJames C. Moon
James C. Moon
GCGabriella Captur
Gabriella Captur
Quantitative myocardial and blood T1 have recently achieved clinical utility in numerous pathologies, as they provide non-invasive tissue characterization with the potential to replace invasive biopsy. Native T1 time (no contrast agent), changes with myocardial extracellular water (edema, focal or diffuse fibrosis), fat, iron, and amyloid protein content. After contrast, the extracellular volume fraction (ECV) estimates the size of the extracellular space and identifies interstitial disease. Spatially resolved quantification of these biomarkers (so-called T1 mapping and ECV mapping) are steadily becoming diagnostic and prognostically useful tests for several heart muscle diseases, influencing clinical decision-making with a pending second consensus statement due mid-2017. This review outlines the physics involved in estimating T1 times and summarizes the disease-specific clinical and research impacts of T1 and ECV to date. We conclude by highlighting some of the remaining challenges such as their community-wide delivery, quality control, and standardization for clinical practice.

1 August 2014 in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SWSebastian Weingärtner
Sebastian Weingärtner
SRSébastien Roujol
Sébastien Roujol
MAMehmet Akcakaya
Mehmet Akcakaya
TBTamer A. Basha
Tamer A. Basha
RNReza Nezafat
Reza Nezafat
Purpose: To develop a novel pulse sequence for free‐breathing, multislice, native myocardial T1 mapping.Methods: The slice‐interleaved T1 (STONE) sequence consists of multiple sets of single‐shot images of different slices, acquired after a single nonselective inversion pulse. Each slice is only selectively excited once after each inversion pulse to allow sampling of the unperturbed longitudinal magnetization in the adjacent slices. For respiratory motion, a prospective slice‐tracking respiratory navigator is used to decrease through‐plane motion followed by a retrospective image registration to reduce in‐plane motion. STONE T1 maps were calculated using both a two‐parameter and three‐parameter fit model. The accuracy and precision of the STONE sequence for different T1, T2, and inversion pulse efficiency were studied using numerical simulations and phantom experiments. T1 maps from 14 subjects were acquired with the STONE sequence and T1s were compared to the MOdified Look‐Locker Inversion recovery sequence (MOLLI).Results: In numerical simulations and phantom experiments, the STONE sequence using a two‐parameter fit model yields more accurate T1 times compared to MOLLI, with similar high precision. The three‐parameter fit model further improves the accuracy, but with a reduced precision. The native myocardial T1 times were higher in the STONE sequence using two‐ or three‐parameter fit compared to MOLLI. The standard deviation of the T1 times was lower in the STONE T1 maps with a two‐parameter fit compared with MOLLI or a three‐parameter fit.Conclusion: The STONE sequence allows accurate and precise quantification of native myocardial T1 times with the additional benefit of covering the entire ventricle. Magn Reson Med 74:115–124, 2015.

28 September 2017 in NMR in Biomedicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBMarco Bertleff
Marco Bertleff
SDSebastian Domsch
Sebastian Domsch
SWSebastian Weingärtner
Sebastian Weingärtner
JZJascha Zapp
Jascha Zapp
KOKieran O'BRien
Kieran O'BRien
LSLothar R. Schad
Lothar R. Schad

7 August 2014 in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMehmet Akcakaya
Mehmet Akcakaya
TBTamer A. Basha
Tamer A. Basha
SWSebastian Weingärtner
Sebastian Weingärtner
SRSébastien Roujol
Sébastien Roujol
SBSophie Berg
Sophie Berg
RNReza Nezafat
Reza Nezafat
Purpose: To develop an improved T2 prepared (T2prep) balanced steady‐state free‐precession (bSSFP) sequence and signal relaxation curve fitting method for myocardial T2 mapping.Methods: Myocardial T2 mapping is commonly performed by acquisition of multiple T2prep bSSFP images and estimating the voxel‐wise T2 values using a two‐parameter fit for relaxation. However, a two‐parameter fit model does not take into account the effect of imaging pulses in a bSSFP sequence or other imperfections in T2prep RF pulses, which may decrease the robustness of T2 mapping. Therefore, we propose a novel T2 mapping sequence that incorporates an additional image acquired with saturation preparation, simulating a very long T2prep echo time. This enables the robust estimation of T2 maps using a 3‐parameter fit model, which captures the effect of imaging pulses and other imperfections. Phantom imaging is performed to compare the T2 maps generated using the proposed 3‐parameter model with the conventional two‐parameter model, as well as a spin echo reference. In vivo imaging is performed on eight healthy subjects to compare the different fitting models.Results: Phantom and in vivo data show that the T2 values generated by the proposed 3‐parameter model fitting do not change with different choices of the T2prep echo times, and are not statistically different than the reference values for the phantom (P = 0.10 with three T2prep echoes). The two‐parameter model exhibits dependence on the choice of T2prep echo times and are significantly different than the reference values (P = 0.01 with three T2prep echoes).Conclusion: The proposed imaging sequence in combination with a three‐parameter model allows accurate measurement of myocardial T2 values, which is independent of number and duration of T2prep echo times. Magn Reson Med 74:93–105, 2015.