Background: The prevalence of neurological disorders is increasing worldwide. In recent decades, the conventional rehabilitation for people with neurological disorders has been often reinforced with the use of technological devices (robots and virtual reality). The aim of this systematic review was to identify the evidence on the economic cost of rehabilitation with robotic and virtual reality devices for people with neurological disorders through a review of the scientific publications over the last 15 years. Methods: A systematic review was conducted on partial economic evaluations (cost description, cost analysis, description of costs and results) and complete (cost minimization, cost-effectiveness, cost utility and cost benefit) studies. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. The main data sources used were PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science (WOS). Studies published in English over the last 15 years were considered for inclusion in this review, regardless of the type of neurological disorder. The critical appraisal instrument from the Joanna Briggs Institute for economic evaluation and the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) were used to analyse the methodological quality of all the included papers. Results: A total of 15 studies were included in this review. Ten papers were focused on robotics and five on virtual reality. Most of the studies were focused on people who experienced a stroke. The robotic device most frequently used in the papers included was InMotion^® (Bionik Co., Watertown, MA, USA), and for those focused on virtual reality, all papers included used semi-immersive virtual reality systems, with commercial video game consoles (Nintendo Wii^® (Nintendo Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan) and Kinect^® (Microsoft Inc., Redmond, WA, USA)) being used the most. The included studies mainly presented cost minimization outcomes and a general description of costs per intervention, and there were disparities in terms of population, setting, device, protocol and the economic cost outcomes evaluated. Overall, the methodological quality of the included studies was of a moderate level. Conclusions: There is controversy about using robotics in people with neurological disorders in a rehabilitation context in terms of cost minimization, cost-effectiveness, cost utility and cost benefits. Semi-immersive virtual reality devices could involve savings (mainly derived from the low prices of the systems analysed and transportation services if they are applied through telerehabilitation programmes) compared to in-clinic interventions.

Background: Muscle strength and dexterity impairments are common among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) producing limitations in activities of daily living related to the upper limb (UL). This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of serious games specifically developed for the MYO Armband® capture sensor in improving forearm and wrist mobility, UL muscle strength, dexterity, fatigue, functionality, quality of life, satisfaction, adverse effects and compliance. Methods: A double-blinded (allocation concealment was performed by a blinded investigator and by blinding for assessors) randomised controlled trial was conducted. The sample was randomised into two groups: an experimental group that received treatment based on UL serious games designed by the research team and controlled by the MYO Armband® gesture capture sensor, along with conventional rehabilitation and a control group that received the same conventional rehabilitation for the UL. Both groups received two 60-min sessions per week over an eight-week period. Wrist range of motion (goniometry), grip muscle strength (Jamar® dynamometer), coordination and gross UL dexterity (Box and Block Test), fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale), functionality (ABILHAND), quality of life (Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29), adverse effects (Simulator Sickness Questionnaire, SSQ), perceived workload (NASA-Task load index), satisfaction (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 (CSQ-8), Satisfaction with Technology Scale, System Usability Scale (SUS) and QUEST 2.0) and compliance (attendance) were assessed in both groups pre-treatment, post-treatment and during a follow-up period of 2 weeks without receiving any treatment. Results: Significant differences were observed in the experimental group compared to the control group in the assessment of forearm supination (p = .004) and grip strength (p = .004). Adverse effects were minimal (SSQ: 7/100 points) and perceived workload was low (NASA-Task Load Index: 25/100 points) in the experimental group. The MYO Armband® technology proved to be useful for the participants (SUS: 80.66/100) and the satisfaction scales received high scores (QUEST 2.0: 59.4/70 points; Satisfaction with Technology: 84.36/100 points). There were significant differences between the groups in terms of attendance percentage (p = .029). Conclusions: An experimental protocol using MYO Armband®-based serious games designed for UL rehabilitation showed improvements in active wrist range of motion and handgrip strength in patients with MS, with high satisfaction, minimal adverse effects and workload and excellent compliance. Trial registration number: This randomised controlled trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04171908.

The finger tapping test (FTT) is a tool to evaluate the motor performance of the hand and fingers and eye-hand coordination with applicability in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the intra- and inter-rater reliability of the TappingPro^® mobile app and the construct validity between this app and validated clinical scales for motor performance in healthy subjects and pwMS. 42 healthy subjects (mean age 25.05) and 13 pwMS (mean age 51.69, EDSS between 3 and 7.5E) participated. FTT was performed with the TappingPro^® mobile app. All participants were examined twice, with a one-week interval between the two appointments. For the analysis of construct validity, the Jamar^® hydraulic hand dynamometer, Box and Blocks Test (BBT), and Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT) were used. The intra-rater reliability showed a good correlation (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, ICC > 0.787) for both upper limbs and both times of FTT for healthy subjects, and an excellent correlation (ICC > 0.956) for upper limbs and both times of FTT for pwMS. The ICC for the inter-rater reliability was good (ICC = 0.869) for the non-dominant upper limb in the FTT 10 s of the healthy subjects, and excellent (ICC > 0.904) for all the other measurements of the healthy subjects and pwMS. However, the Bland–Altman plots showed disagreement between observers and measurements that should be considered in the interpretation of clinical evaluations. The correlation analysis for healthy subjects showed poor associations between all variables, except for the association between hand grip strength and the FTT 60 s in the non-dominant upper limb, which had a moderate coefficient. For pwMS, there were moderate to excellent associations between BBT and the NHPT and FTT for both upper limbs. The correlations between hand grip strength and FFT were poor. This mobile app could be a useful and low-cost assessment tool in pwMS, allowing a simple evaluation and follow-up that has excellent correlation with clinical scales validated in this pathology.

Background: The prognosis of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) has improved substantially in recent decades due to advances in diagnosis and treatment. Due to the unpredictable course and heterogenous treatment response in MS, there is a clear need for biomarkers that reflect disease activity in the clinical follow-up of these patients. We conducted a systematic review with Bayesian network meta-analysis with the aim of analyzing the effects of physical exercise on neurofilaments (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) levels in patients with MS. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, starting with a PICO (patient/population, intervention, comparison, and outcome) question: what are the clinical effects of physical exercise (with independence of the type) on NfL and/or GFAP levels in patients with MS compared with other interventions or no intervention whatsoever? A systematically comprehensive literature search was conducted from January to March 2024 to identify original studies that answered the PICO question, using the main data sources. The quality of the studies included was assessed using the Quality Index of Downs & Black. For studies included in the systematic review that followed a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design, the methodological quality of each paper was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) Scale. Risk of bias was also explored by two independent reviewers. Finally, all articles were classified according to the levels of evidence and grades of recommendation for diagnosis studies established by the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine. For continuous outcome measures with enough comparisons and a methodological quality greater than or equal to good according to the PEDro scale, a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was applied. The statistical analyses were performed in R (version 4.1.3, R Core Team 2023) using the “BUGSnet” and “gemtc” packages. Bayesian NMA can be used to obtain a posterior probability distribution of all the relative treatment effects, which allows us to quantify the uncertainty of parameter estimates and to rank all the treatments in the network. Results: Eight studies were included in this systematic review and six articles in the NMA, and they were appraised for quality. The characteristics of the included studies, types of training and described protocols, methodological quality, risk of bias, and clinical effects on the studied biomarkers were outlined. Qualitative synthesis, effects of different exercise modalities in NfL with the Bayesian NMA, selection of the final model and model assessment, and ranking of interventions are also shown. Conclusions: Our findings indicated that moderate-intensity exercise is more likely to reduce NfL concentration compared to high-intensity exercise, and, in turn, high-intensity exercise is more likely to reduce NfL concentration than low-intensity exercise. However, the effects of high-intensity exercise on GFAP levels were inconclusive.

Introduction. The proliferation of immersive virtual reality (VR) technologies has transformed the way individuals interact with digital environments, offering unprecedented opportunities in fields ranging from entertainment and education to healthcare and mental health interventions. Immersive VR is increasingly being implemented in motor and cognitive programs in neurorehabilitation, where patient safety and treatment adherence are critical. Despite its relevance, the conceptualization and measurement of cybersickness (CS) remain fragmented across disciplines, with various assessment tools developed in isolation, targeting different symptom domains, populations, and use contexts. Aim. The aim of this systematic review is to identify, categorize, and critically appraise all existing instruments and scales developed to measure CS associated with immersive VR use. The secondary objectives involve examining the psychometric properties of the identified instruments to provide robust evidence for clinicians in assessing CS associated with VR, thereby supporting future scale development and standardization. Additionally, a further objective is to evaluate the specific applicability of these instruments and scales for measuring CS within neurorehabilitation settings, given the growing use of immersive VR in clinical practice with neurological populations. Methods. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (PRISMACOSMIN). The review protocol was prospectively registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). Data extraction was performed independently by the two reviewers, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus or consultation with a third reviewer. To assess the psychometric robustness of existing CS assessment instruments used in virtual reality settings, we applied the methodology proposed by the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) initiative for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The evaluation was structured across three steps: Assessment of risk of bias; Quality of measurement properties and Summary of evidence; and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines. Results. Nine assessment instruments were included in this review. Following our analysis, the CSQ-VR and VRNQ received a Grade A recommendation, as they met sufficient criteria for both internal consistency and structural validity with high methodological quality. Few instruments have reported validations in specific clinical populations related to neurorehabilitation, including individuals with neurological conditions such as brain injury, multiple sclerosis (MS), migraine-associated vestibulopathy, vestibular disorders or cognitive impairment, indicating a critical gap in scale generalizability across clinical contexts. Conclusions. Despite the increasing use of immersive VR, few CS assessment tools have been designed and validated, reaching the CSQ-VR and VRNQ a Grade A recommendation. Among the nine identified assessment instruments, only the SSQ, MSAQ, CSQ-VR, VRNQ MSSQ and SEQ have been employed in samples with neurological disorders. There is a critical need for standardized CS VR-specific tools with robust psychometric properties to ensure safe and effective implementation in neurorehabilitation settings.

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated inflammatory disease that primarily targets the myelin of axons. Extremities are frequently affected, resulting in a negative impact on both activities of daily living (ADL) and quality of life. In recent years, there has been increasing interest in the potential benefits of exercise and blood flow restriction training (BFRT) programs as a therapeutic tool in people with neurological disorders. The aim of the present systematic review was to know the clinical effects of BFRT programs in people with MS. Methods: A systematically comprehensive literature search was conducted and registered in PROSPERO prior to its execution under the reference number CRD42024588963. The following data sources were used: Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science (WOS) and the Cochrane Library. The following data were extracted from the papers: study design, sample, interventions, dosage, outcome measures and results. To assess the methodological quality of the papers included, the Quality Index of Downs and Black was used. Additionally, the articles were classified according to the levels of evidence and grades of recommendation for diagnosis studies established by the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine. Also, the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions was used by two independent reviewers to assess risk of bias, assessing the six different domains. Results: Seven articles with a total of 71 participants were included in the review. Of the seven articles, five papers studied the effectiveness of BFRT combined with strengthening exercises and two papers studied the effect of BFRT combined with aerobic exercise. Of the five articles that analyzed BFRT combined with strengthening exercises, only two presented a control group. Both performed a low-load resistance training in combination with BFRT with four series, 30/15/15/15 repetitions and a rest of 1 min between the series and 3 min between the exercises. The control groups to which they were compared performed a high intensity strengthening exercise protocol which had the same exercises, sets, rests and duration of the protocol as the experimental groups. For those two papers which investigated the effects of BFRT combined with aerobic training, exercise was performed in two sessions per week for a period of 8 and 6 weeks, respectively. In both studies, the experimental protocol began with a warm-up phase and ended with a cool-down phase, and there were differences in cuff management. All these investigations found positive effects in the interventions that combined exercise with BFRT. The characteristics, outcome measures, effects of the interventions and the assessment of the methodological quality of the included studies and risk of bias are shown in the tables. Conclusions: BFRT in people with MS appears to be effective and safe for people with MS. BFRT might show positive clinical effects on strength, hypertrophy and balance outcomes. Nevertheless, future research should be conducted with better methodological quality to ensure the potential benefits of BFRT in people with MS since the studies analyzed present a high risk of bias and methodological limitations.